The Mysterious Vanishing Refugees of the New York Times
Old Gray Lady Story Hour...
By Sabrina Tavernise with contributions by Mona Mahmoud, Sahar Nageeb and Qais Mizher.
From today's New York Times:
As Death Stalks Iraq, Middle-Class Exodus BeginsThis Christian Iraqi family is not likely to head east to Iran, unless they like badges.
In the latest indication of the crushing hardships weighing on the lives of Iraqis, increasing portions of the middle class seem to be doing everything they can to leave the country. In the last 10 months, the state has issued new passports to 1.85 million Iraqis, 7 percent of the population and a quarter of the country's estimated middle class.
...Iraqi officials and international organizations put the number of Iraqis in Jordan at close to a million. Syrian cities also have growing Iraqi populations.

The New York Times says that Assad Bahjat, with his wife, Eileen, and their two children, Elvis, left, and Andres are getting the hell out.
Of course, the truth is that even at the start of the war when there were expectations of tens of thousands of refugees fleeing the violence of war, there was no more than a trickle, and many of those were going in the opposite direction.
And, estimates of Iraqi refugees in Jordan before the war were around half a million. Where the four authors of this story found their figure today is anyone's guess. Last year, and since before the war, the number of Iraqis living in Jordan was estimated at 300,000-500,000:
Jordanian Interior Ministry General Secretary Mukhaimer Abu Jamous told TNS that the accepted number of Iraqis in Jordan is more like 300,000 – though he was quick to claim that these are not refugees, but rather people on personal business or vacation.Iraqi expert, Amir Taheri, has much different news today about the refugee situation in the "Real Iraq" (via Instapundit):
An official at the United Nations High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR) in Amman said that 15,000 Iraqis had received temporary protection for asylum-seekers pending official refugee status. Only 800 Iraqis have received official refugee status in Jordan, she added, almost all of whom fled during the Saddam Hussein regime. The official refused to allow TNS to report her name, claiming it is UNHCR policy for spokespeople not to be identified in news stories.
When things have been truly desperate in Iraqin 1959, 1969, 1971, 1973, 1980, 1988, and 1990long queues of Iraqis have formed at the Turkish and Iranian frontiers, hoping to escape. In 1973, for example, when Saddam Hussein decided to expel all those whose ancestors had not been Ottoman citizens before Iraqs creation as a state, some 1.2 million Iraqis left their homes in the space of just six weeks. This was not the temporary exile of a small group of middle-class professionals and intellectuals, which is a common enough phenomenon in most Arab countries. Rather, it was a departure en masse, affecting people both in small villages and in big cities, and it was a scene regularly repeated under Saddam Hussein.As Prairie Pundit had pointed out last month, the Multi-National Forces-Iraq tracks refugee numbers and has very low estimate based on their findings.
Since the toppling of Saddam in 2003, this is one highly damaging image we have not seen on our television setsand we can be sure that we would be seeing it if it were there to be shown. To the contrary, Iraqis, far from fleeing, have been returning home. By the end of 2005, in the most conservative estimate, the number of returnees topped the 1.2-million mark. Many of the camps set up for fleeing Iraqis in Turkey, Iran, and Saudi Arabia since 1959 have now closed down. The oldest such center, at Ashrafiayh in southwest Iran, was formally shut when its last Iraqi guests returned home in 2004.

This is the official map of IDP camps in Iraq.
Major General Rick Lynch, spokesman for the Multi-National Forces-Iraq had this to say about the refugee situation in Iraq just last month:
Another indicator for civil war would be forced population movements. And we are extremely sensitive to that. We see reports of tens of thousands of families displaced here in Iraq, and we chase down each and every one of those reports. And I'll show you detail in a minute. But we have seen some displacement, pockets of families moving, but not in large numbers....This is just like last month when the New York Times pretended there were 100,000 families wandering around the Iraqi desert.
...And this is very important. We have not been asked for any assistance for displaced civilians. The provincial government has not asked, the local governments have not asked, the national government has not asked. So if there are indeed 36,000-plus families that have been displaced, we're not seeing it.
We indeed move to check every report of displaced civilians. And we were told about displaced civilian camps, and of the 16 that we were told about, we can only confirm the location of four -- one in Fallujah, one in Baghdad, one in al Kut, and one down in Basra.
However, there is no mass exodus. There are no swelling IDP camps!
But, the four contributors at the New York Times would rather stick to story-telling.
Dr. Sanity tries to make sense of the Times reporting.




































7 Comments:
It's hard to report on the situation in Iraq from your suite at the Plaza Hotel in Paris. Or from your summer rental in London. Ah, the life of a NY Times reporter...
Zeyad of Healing Iraq has announced plans to leave the country.
Omar of Iraq the Model described in detail how many friends of his were planning to leave the country in a very recent post.
I think that should resolve the issue, and the NYTimes reporter reported from the field despite Da Man's lies.
You know they scrape journalists from the bottom of the barrel. The worst of those go to the New York Times.
Iraq has had a low level civil war going for nearly 90 years now. People come and go. For most Iraqis--not the Baathists--life is getting better, and the opinion polls in Iraq show that.
Baathist butchers no longer have power in Iraq and that makes some people sad.
Oh my, Zeyad is leaving! And several of Omar's friends... Call out the UN High Commission on Refugees! For Anonymous, here's a brief history lesson, and some perspective on refugees.
The three largest mass migrations (excluding the Indian partition) of the past century have occurred in Asia. They were, in chronological order:
1) Chinese-to-Taiwan/HK, 1949-50 (2 million)
2) Vietnam, 1975-1980 (2 million)
3) Afghanistan, 1979-1989 (5 million)
The first two are significant because they were sea-based migrations --not an easy undertaking for those involved. Hundreds of thousands of refugees drowned while fleeing, in both cases, communist governments. Imagine an sea-based evacuation 10 times the size of Dunkirk!
Almost all of the Vietnamese refugees settled in the US while a substantial number from Taiwan did as well.
While the Afghan migration also involved communists, it took place entirely on land AND most of the refugees have returned after the fall of the Taliban.
Do you know any Iraqi refugees, other than Zeyad and Omar's buddies? Write me when you meet one in person.
Dope.
Da Man, it must be wonderful to be so detached from reality. What on Earth do the major refugee movements of the past have to do with this situation ? What on Earth is the significance of how they took place and how they were resolved ?
[Incidentally, you are wrong. You forgot the creation of Bangladesh, which led to millions of refugees fleeing to India in 1971. You also forgot some of the mass movements in and at the end of WW-II, and the mass relocations of entire groups by Stalin]
The article claimed that Iraq's middle class, elite was leaving. We have several recent examples among that class, in Iraq's middle class elite (the ones who would blog). Of course this is not a mass migration as some of the past migrations where, but even the loss of a few talented people can hurt a country greatly.
How many Iraqi refugees I personally know is as irrelevant as how many Bangladeshi refugees I know.
And thanks for confirming that you were indeed lying in your comments about the NYTimes reporter reporting from Paris.
But dont worry -- you can stick to your fiction that Iraq is in great, hunky dory shape, no problem at all.
Anonymous, I don't find where Sabrina Tavernise is actually in Baghdad. My guess from the first forty google hits is that she is in NY. Several sources she uses seem to be in Iraq, though nothing indicates whether they ever leave the secure areas. In any event, I believe da man's original criticism was meant to be generic about NYT reporters.
Tavernise was a NYT reporter on Russia for several years, including an article on how things were better under communism for most people.
"...even the loss of a few talented people can hurt a country greatly." Yeah, exactly. Good reason to get rid of dictators who execute people maybe.
Anon,
I excluded Indian partition, you dope. This also means Bangladesh, (ex-Pakistan, ex-India).
I guess if the NYT is right, this means we'll be seeing more Iraqi restaurants in the US--not!
Again, write us when you meet a single Iraqi refugee. Most of us here know Chinese, Vietnamese, Cambodian, Ethiopian, etc. refugees because THEY EXIST AND MOVED TO THE US. Actually meeting an Iraqi refugee is relevant, because if there are as many as the Times claims, they would be highly visable (i.e. opening restaurants in the US).
Then again, you are a white liberal, so you probably live in a segregated neighborhood in a blue state, surrounded by your white liberal friends. No dark skinned people in your neighborhood!
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home