If Gay Activists & Democrats Knew of Foley, Why Were They Silent?
Radical gay activists made it their mission to out closeted members of the gay community - Today, it's their turn to be outed.
Radical Gay Rights Activists at Blogactive held on to information about Representative Foley for months and years. These "Rights Activists" knew that representative Foley had relationships with "young men less than half his age." They did their own investigation on Foley. They even flew in their sources in to be interviewed about the Representative. At least one activist shared this information with the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee. He held on to the information for over a year. He wrote about how he would break the story at midterm elections!
But, the radical gay activists and democrats never thought about the safety of the teens who were at risk!

John Aravosis, ("He deserves to be publicly excoriated."- 7-2004 Picture from the Blade) along with fellow radical gay activist Mike Rogers, worked in tandem but not together, to out members of Congress.
Mike Rogers wrote about Foley's get togethers with young men less than half his age but held on to the information until recently like he said he would do back in March of 2005.
Aravosis at his blog AmericaBlog said on June 4, 2004:
Pope blasts pedophilesIt looks like the Pope has some competition!
by John in DC - 6/04/2004 03:23:00 PM
Just kidding. He's actually attacking gays, again. On pedophilia, he's still vying for the title as the world's greatest enabler.
It is widely known that John Aravosis had no love for Foley because he was a closet case. Although, there is no evidence right now that he also was holding on to information about Foley, he did work in tandem with Mike Rogers in their outing campaign of politicians.
And, despite what others may think, the reason Foley did not run for the Senate was because of pressure by Aravosis and the radical gay movement to make his life hell for being a closeted homosexual:
Despite Foley's FMA opposition, Aravosis purported to out Foley as well, taking him to task for supporting President Bush, who endorsed the measure late last winter. Labeling Foley as "our latest closeted gay hypocrite," Aravosis said Foley made the list for putting politics ahead of his own community by "whoring for an anti-gay president."This brings us to where we are today. The plan to bring down the Republican Party is working just as it was planned a year and a half ago.
...Foley responded to the reports by initiating a telephone press conference among non-gay Florida media and called discussion about his sexual orientation "revolting." He declined at that time to answer questions about his sexual orientation and subsequently abandoned his bid for the Senate, citing concerns over his father's health.
** Obviously, CNN's timeline is a bit off, to say the least!
World Net Daily is now carrying this story.
HRC is slow to react. Why?
Also:
MacsMind- The Setup III
AJ Strata- Foley Smear and Coverup.
Hugh Hewitt- Fight Back!
Update: This is about to Bust Open!
Previously:
The Foley Fallout
Foley Fallout: What We Know Now
Foleygate! Altered Images! What's Going On Here?
Foleygate: What Stunk Like a Rat, Was a Democ-Rat!




































17 Comments:
How is one holding "on to information about Representative Foley for months and years" when they are publishiing it, as your links make abundantly clear? And how is CREW holding onto information when it turned the information over to the FBI as soon as they had it? Isn't that the opposite of holding onto it, or has the world turned upside down in the last 24 hours?
Oh, never mind, silly me. This is a wingnut blog, where the world is always upside down. I should have known that as soon as I saw Instarube link to you approvingly.
Here is a modest proposal to those of you who are actual conservatives, and not mere sycophants to the current Republican leaders. Be mad at Foley, the actual criminal. And be mad at the House leadership, which failed to keep other pages out of harm's way. Find some Republican politicians who actually honor your values and who don't simply ignore them or mock them.
what the hell is this post about? what does foley being gay have anything to do with anything? Isn't the issue about underage solicitation? how does it matter who knew and when that foley was gay? what an incoherent nonsensical rant this is.
Wow! We're really deep into tinfoil territory here, aren't we?
I think the point is they knew of his inappropriate and possibly illegal behavior over a year ago and waited for a politically expedient time to release it. If Foley had commited another crime during that time I would think these fellows would have some serious questions to answer. As it is I think they will find that they setback gays more than Republicans by the time the dust settles.
RJ,
They did not wait. They posted it. CREW gave the information to the FBI. Try again, unless you are referring to the GOP leadership.
Charles
I agree with RJ on that last. The dirty little secret here is that there is a portion of the gay community that is absolutely in favor of lowering the age-of-consent laws...and the "mainstream" gay advocacy groups have never really come out too harshly, if at all, against organizations like the North American Man-Boy Love Association. That is a problem, similar in several ways to the "peaceful" Islamists who appear to be giving their murderous brothers a pass when it comes to public criticism. You wanna talk about the unhinged, Mr. G? Don't EVEN get me started about ACT-UP,,,
War is Peace. Ignorance is Slavery. Publishing is Hiding. Speaking is Silence.
This is the strangest excuse for a gotcha I've ever seen.
They did not wait. They posted it. CREW gave the information to the FBI. Try again, unless you are referring to the GOP leadership.
Are you trolls really THAT stupid, or are you just liars?
They posted that Foley is GAY. Is THAT a crime or something for which he should have been censured?
If you were the least bit honest (or could read), you'd see the implications in Rogers' post about near- (or possibly) underaged young men. IMPLICATIONS. Not any kind of facts. If he were looking for something to use against Foley at the midterm elections, don't you think that would be it? He even said simply being gay wasn't enough because apparently "everyone knew it." (The idiot Rogers seems to think being gay is only not a crime if you're on his side. He's the biggest hypocrite of all!)
And closely following Mike Rogers in unabashed hypocrisy are these gasbag trolls here.
You idiots couldn't care less about the kid. All you care about is political points-scoring, as is evidenced by your sleazebag ActBlue campaign that uses a victim of a sexual predator as a fundraising tool, and your INSISTENCE that Dennis Hastert "knew," regardless of what EVERYONE in DC is saying. You just keep repeating the same pathetic, sleazy lie. But keep it up! I'm sure you do think American voters are as stupid as you are! LOL!
They posted he was gay..
They posted he was hitting on men less than half his age (currently 52) so that means the men he was after was younger than 25..that does not automatically mean teenagers..
CREW is funded by Soros. ie it is a Democrat front which was oh so conveniently given this information just before the mid-terms - information on messages sent several years ago...
This was a planned hit job.
Stealth Bomber,
Wow, you really convinced me with your use of "LOL."
Really persuasive stuff.
Charles
Is it considered blackmail to threaten to out people if they don't vote the way one wants? Seems awfully close, IMO. Mike Rogers needs to be investigated.
Oh and BTW GREAT threads about this case and the various Dem operatives involved.
I would expect gay advocates to stand up for Foley, a gay man who is being characterized as sick, crazy, and evil. These young people were *over the age of consent.* And they participated!
Why aren't the gay advocates standing up for the freedom of these young men to explore their sexual identity?
I still can't see what crime Foley committed. The lynch mob needs to cool off.
Adults who like teenagers are not pedophiles, which refers to pre-pubescent children. They are ephebophiles--refers to postpubescents. Our culture is ephebophilic...we like our teenage pop tarts and Abercrombie and Fitch. We have a hypocritical society! Teens are sexual! No they aren't! Wha????
Adult men who like teen girls are called cherrypickers. Adult men who like to help teen men explore their homosexual potential are called ... gay!
So this whole lynch mob mentality is Democrats using homophobia for political purposes. I thought Democrats were more pro-gay than that. I am sorely disappointed.
Adult men who like teen girls are called cherrypickers. Adult men who like to help teen men explore their homosexual potential are called ... gay!
No, they're called Chickenhawks; they prey on the insecure and confused and are despicable.
All this Foley thing takes place in a work kind of environment, doesn't it? Not too different from a teacher going after sophomore high school students. That teacher would be thrown out on his ass. So why does Foley get "rehab"? Gay or straight, it's about abusing your power as an authoritative figure.
Foley is a "chicken hawk" and Jordan Edmund was a chicken.
It's a dirty little secret in the gay community that these kinds of "relationships" are not in the least condemned by the greater gay society which explains why John Aravosis etal didn't think twice about holding on to the information.
Personally THEY DON'T SEE ANYTHING WRONG WITH IT!
And why you won't hear much from the greater gay community because they don't care to have their dirty laundry aired.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home