Murtha Owes All Marines an Apology for His Hideous Slander!
Will Murtha Now Apologize For His Slander Against the US Marines?
The military announced the very sad news today that 8 marines were charged with crimes surrounding the Haditha incident in late 2005.
The BBC reported:
Lt Col Jeffrey R Chessani: Violation of a lawful order; dereliction
Sgt Sanick P Dela Cruz: Unpremeditated murder; false official statement
1st Lt Andrew A Grayson: Dereliction; false official statement; obstructing justice
Capt Lucas M McConnell: Dereliction
Lance Cpl Justin L Sharratt: Unpremeditated murder
Capt Randy W Stone: Violation of a lawful order; dereliction
Lance Cpl Stephen B Tatum: Unpremeditated murder; negligent homicide; assault
Staff Sgt Frank D Wuterich: Unpremeditated murder; soliciting another to commit an offence; false official statement
Reuters reported:
CAMP PENDLETON, California (Reuters) - The U.S. military charged four
Marines on Thursday with murder and four others on related charges in the
November 2005 deaths of 24 unarmed civilians in Haditha.
The killings of the men, women and children is one of the most serious
allegations of misconduct against civilians by U.S. troops in Iraq. Iraqi Prime
Minister Nuri al-Maliki has called the Haditha killings a "terrible
crime."
Along with the widely publicized abuses of Iraqi prisoners at the Abu Ghraib
prison, the killings have damaged U.S. prestige and led to international
condemnation.
Marine Corps squad leader Staff Sgt. Frank Wuterich (pictures below), whose lawyer said
was charged with 13 counts of murder, led a squad investigated in connection
with the November 19, 2005 shootings in the western Iraqi town.Wuterich's attorney, Mark Zaid, said the charges carry a maximum penalty of life in prison.
Others charged with murder are Sgt. Sanick Dela
Cruz, Lance Cpl. Justin Sharratt and Lance Cpl. Stephen Tatum. The remaining
four are charged with failure to properly report and/or investigate the
deaths.
"The reporting of the incident up the chain of command was inaccurate
and untimely," Col. Stewart Navarre told reporters in announcing the
charges.
The military investigation has centered on a squad of Marines led by
Wuterich, 26, who sued
Democratic Rep. John Murtha in August after he said U.S. troops
"killed innocent civilians in cold blood."
Once charged, the defendants are entitled to an Article 32 hearing, in
which a military judge would decide if there is enough evidence to convene a
court-martial. The schedule for the hearing has not been
set.
Defense lawyers dispute that version of events and say the men
from Kilo Company, 3rd Battalion, 1st Marine Regiment, 1st Marine Division were
engaged in a furious battle in Haditha after the bomb exploded and the civilians
may have died during the chaos.
Two probes were launched into Haditha, one centering on the shooting
and another into whether officers attempted to falsify details of the
incident.
It wasn’t that long ago that anti-war Rep. John Murtha accused these marines of premeditated killing- “in cold blood” . The charges today demonstrate that none of the Haditha deaths were premeditated by the US marines.
Will Rep. Murtha apologize for slandering the marines?
Don’t hold your breath!!!
Others covering this closely:
Riehl World View
Michelle Malkin
Euphoric Reality
Sweetness and Light
posted by Gateway Pundit at 12/22/2006 07:31:00 PM
4 Comments:
Quote Murtha's entire statement about the killings, idiot. Quoting only three words could mean you have something to hide. You can't possibly be hiding something, can you, Jimbo?
Also see The JAG Hunter and companion blog The JAGMIRE
Rep. John Murtha: "It's much worse than reported in Time magazine. There was no fire fight. There was no IED that killed these innocent people. Our troops overreacted because of the pressure on them and they killed innocent civilians in cold blood. And that's what the report is going to tell." - Source, Rep. Murtha's press page.
The fact is that being charged is not being convicted and for ANY elected representative to decide that this is the case BEFORE the wheels of justice have turned, is to prejudge the case and put bias into it. That is inexcusable, no matter how bad the crime. One is innocent until proven guilty and I expect that Military Justice will run its course for Due Process of Law as THAT is the standard of this Nation, not to be tried and convicted by Representatives in the Media Court.
And then there is this exchange: "QUESTION:
Have you read that report?
Congressman Murtha:
I have not read it, no."
Thus Rep. Murtha is speaking from hearsay, not from anything found by those doing the report for the official record which is what Justice is served upon.
Which is exactly what the Marine Corps was looking for:
"They actually went into the houses and killed women and children," the congressman said.
Citing an ongoing investigation, the Marine Corps said, "Any comment at this time would be inappropriate and could undermine the investigatory and possible legal process." - Source, CNN 19 MAY 2006
Working with hearsay, not having heard the report and not refraining from commenting in a prejudicial way are all things that undermine Due Process of Law, be it civil or military law. Rep. Murtha could easily have just said that 'If the allegations prove out to be true it is a sad day for the soldiers involved and the Corps, but until then I refrain from commenting'. He did not do so and thus put out hearsay as fact and has prejudiced the proceedings by his pronouncements as a Representative of the United States. THAT is neither of check nor balance in the Constitution but an endangerment OF those checks and balances.
For that Rep. Murtha should receive due criticism for that is endangering the system of justice of the US itself and its Armed Forces, something far worse than the alleged crimes he talked about.
"For that Rep. Murtha should receive due criticism for that is endangering the system of justice of the US itself and its Armed Forces, something far worse than the alleged crimes he talked about."
Amazing. Commenting on the killings in Haditha is "far worse than the alleged crimes". Saying something the wingers don't like is considered a crime far more heinous that actually killing Iraqi civilians.
I don't think there could be a better example of the twisted, inverted moral incompetence of the far right than the example that Jacksonian just provided.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home