Breaking: Senate Democrats Back Defeat!
Senate democrats today refused to strike language that would tie the hands of the Commander-in-Chief by imposing an arbitrary timetable for the withdrawal of U.S. forces from Iraq:
Defying a veto threat, the Democratic-controlled Senate narrowly signaled support Tuesday for the withdrawal of U.S. combat troops from Iraq by next March.The senate will now convene tomorrow to resume consideration of H.R. 1591, the Supplemental pork-bloated Appropriations bill.
Republican attempts to scuttle the non-binding timeline failed on a vote of 50-48 (Roll Call HERE), largely along party lines. The roll call marked the Senate's most forceful challenge to date of the administration's handling of a war that has claimed the lives of more than 3,200 U.S. troops.
John McCain, R-Ariz., a presidential hopeful, said that "we are starting to turn things around" in the Iraq war" and that a timeline for withdrawal would embolden the terrorists in Iraq and elsewhere.
The effect of the timeline would be to "snatch defeat from the jaws of progress in Iraq," agreed Lieberman, who won a new term last fall in a three-way race after losing the Democratic nomination to an anti-war insurgent.
Bush had previously said he would veto any bill containing the timeline, and the White House freshened the threat a few hours before the vote on Tuesday. "This and other provisions would place freedom and democracy in Iraq at grave risk, embolden our enemies and undercut the administration's plan to develop the Iraqi economy," it said in a statement.
Similar legislation drew only 48 votes in the Senate earlier this month, but Democratic leaders made a change that persuaded Nebraska's Democratic Sen. Ben Nelson to swing behind the measure.
Additionally, Sen. Chuck Hagel of Nebraska, a vocal critic of the war, sided with the Democrats, assuring them of the majority they needed to turn back a challenge led by Sen. Thad Cochran, R-Miss.
Strange how they were just recently opposed to timetables, via RedState:
** While stumping for votes last September, senatorial candidate Jim Webb said: “Anyone who tells you we can set a timetable for withdrawal doesn’t understand war. And anyone who says that nothing can be done to speed a secure peace doesn’t understand America.”
** On March 8, Sen. Ben Nelson said: “I’m bothered by dates. I think you still have to go on conditions for staying.”
** On March 12, Sen. Evan Bayh wrote: “I, for example, am not in support of circling a date on a calendar and saying, ‘no matter what, we’re out on that date.’ ”
** Nancy Pelosi spent $28 billion last week to round up 218 votes (the exact minimum to get a majority in the 435-member House). That worked out to $130 million or so per vote.
Tomorrow the Senate will vote on Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Bill for FY2007 along with these add-ons, via Victory Caucus:
$24 million for funding for sugar beets.More on the senator with the secret escape plan.
$3 million for funding for sugar cane (goes to one Hawaiian co-op).
$20 million for insect infestation damage reimbursements in Nevada, Idaho, and Utah.
$2.1 billion for crop production losses.
$1.5 billion for livestock production losses.
$100 million for Dairy Production Losses.
$13 million for Ewe Lamb Replacement and Retention Program.
$32 million for Livestock Indemnity Program.
$40 million for the Tree Assistance Program.
$100 million for Small Agricultural Dependent Businesses.
$6 million for North Dakota flooded crop land.
$35 million for emergency conservation program.
$50 million for the emergency watershed program.
$115 million for the conservation security program.
$18 million for drought assistance in upper Great Plains/South West.
Provision that extends the availability by a year $3.5 million in funding for guided tours of the Capitol. Also a provision allows transfer of funds from holiday ornament sales in the Senate gift shop.
$165.9 million for fisheries disaster relief, funded through NOAA (including $60.4 million for salmon fisheries in the Klamath Basin region).
$12 million for forest service money (requested by the president in the non-emergency FY2008 budget).
$425 million for education grants for rural areas – (Secure Rural Schools program).
$640 million for LIHEAP.
$25 million for asbestos abatement at the Capitol Power Plant.
$388.9 million for funding for backlog of old Department of Transportation projects.
$22.8 million for geothermal research and development.
$500 million for wildland fire management.
$13 million for mine safety technology research.
$31 million for one month extension of Milk Income Loss Contract program (MILC)
$50 million for fisheries disaster mitigation fund.
$100 million for security at the Presidential Candidate Nominating Conventions
$2 million for the University of Vermont




































9 Comments:
Sickening. Disgusting. Immoral. Cowards.
cornhusker,
Have you contacted Senator Nelson and Hagel about your disgust with their votes?
http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm?State=NE
I have voted for both Hagel and Nelson in the past. I have informed both that based on this one vote they have lost my support forever. I will be supporting their opponents in the next campaign.
I encourage everyone to contact them and let them know how you feel.
The success of the Surge has Democrats losing their minds. They will pull out all the stops to ensure defeat. As for Hagel there's no mind to lose. How on earth does this guy get elected in Nebraska?
Reality check. You adults are really foolish to think Democrats want the military to lose. Seriously?
John McCain said Iraq had a long way to go, but there have been successes and security has improved in Baghdad. He simply asked that some of the positive accomplishments be reported, also. He wanted to
Michelle Malkin walked through a Baghdad neighborhood earlier this year!
They even went up and had some tea with Iraqis. Iraqis were cordial and even friendly to her.
http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/24/khadimiyah-dismounted-patrol/
Iraq has a long way to go, but the new strategy has just begun and it's already working.
When we abandoned the Vietnamese people millions were murdered. Why do Democrats seem to want to repeat this ugly scenario?
We lost almost 60,000 Americans in Vietnam. Going into the 5th year of war we have lost over 3,100 American Hereos. Sad to lose any Heores, but my gosh that's amazing to me.
We need to keep this in perspective. No matter why we disagree with the way the Iraq War began we are THERE now.
Abandoning Iraq is a black eye on America. It is Defeat for our country and our U.S. Military.
Last year al-Qaeda's, Abu Ayyub al-Masri, stated they had lost more than 4,000 al-Qaeda fighters IN IRAQ!
http://cbs11tv.com/national/topstories_story_271102007.html
Like it or not the fronts in the war on terror are Afghanistan and Iraq. Our American Hereos are trained to kill these terrorists and they are doing just that while trying to rebuild two countries.
Last year it was reported that more than 55,000 were murdered in Brazil!
http://www.boston.com/news/world/latinamerica/articles/2006/09/25/brazil_murder_rate_similar_to_war_zone_data_shows/
That was more than 3 years of war in Iraq! Does that make what has happened in Iraq better? No.
But abandoning Iraq is not he answer. Our troops are on the ground face to face with the Iraqi people and THEY want to finish the job.
Let them finish the job and come home with their heads held high.
The new strategy is already working. General Patraeus has only been there a couple months. My God give the man what he needs to win and back off Democrats.
A pork filled bribe Bill with strings attached is not the way to support our U.S. Military in harm's way in Afghanistan and Iraq.
Michael Ware has his own blatant agenda, but Michelle Malkin has walked down a Baghdad neighborhood safely.
Actually R. James, as a Vietnam veteran who watched the defeat of the police action even while we were winning, I do believe what they say. Instead of reading crooksandliars why don't you revisit Murthas video of last month. It says it all. Slow bleed.
More reality.
If the whole mainstream media and the Democrats and those who oppose are actively pursuing a loss in Iraq, then you can choose a few sources--Michelle Malkin, Free Republic--and use those to find the reality you like. Then you never have to deal with the death and destruction wrought by all of Washington who got us there in the first place. You can pretend that you're heroes fighting the good fight. But reality is fast encroaching and making the rose colored glasses view harder to maintain. Damned if ya'll aren't still trying.
Everyone knows about the bad.
How many know Michelle Malkin has "walked down a Baghdad neighborhood"??!!
That is one example McCain is talking about. Michael Ware is being disengenuous and has been shown to be full of shit by little ol' Michelle Malkin.
John McCain is simply asking to report some of the positive accomplishments along with the negative.
Now Michael Ware says that reason the U.S. Military is having success in Iraq is because "al-Qaeda is lieing low".
Last night he said it wasn't safe to walk the streets of Baghdad ANYWHERE. Where little ol' Michell Malkin proved that to be FALSE now he says the streets are safer because al-Qaeda is hiding.
http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/29/video-ware-attacks-lieberman-for-saying-soldiers-are-more-confident-walking-the-streets-of-baghdad/
What a disengenuous biased agenda driven ass.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home