Tuesday, May 29, 2007

Bush Proposes Action On Darfur Genocide- Blasts UN Approach

Enough is Enough.
Hundreds of thousands have died.
The genocide in Darfur continues.
And, the UN approach has not stopped the bloodshed.

Sheikas, or traditional women leaders, are seen at the south Darfur refugee camp of Kalma April 10, 2007. Now in its fourth year, the Darfur conflict has become the world's worst humanitarian crisis, and rape is its regular byproduct, U.N. and other human rights activists say. Sudan's government denies arming and unleashing the janjaweed, and bristles at the charges of rape, saying its conservative Islamic society would never tolerate it. (AP Photo/Alfred de Montesquiou)

Today President Bush told the world community and UN that it was time to act on Darfur.
The White House reported:

Good morning. For too long, the people of Darfur have suffered at the hands of a government that is complicit in the bombing, murder, and rape of innocent civilians. My administration has called these actions by their rightful name: genocide. The world has a responsibility to help put an end to it.

Last month I announced that the United States was prepared to take new steps if the government of Sudan did not allow the full deployment of a U.N. peacekeeping force; if the government did not begin living up to its many commitments, that the United States would act. I made clear that the time for promises was over, and that President Bashir had to do something to end the suffering.

I held off implementing these steps because the United Nations believed that President Bashir could meet his obligations to stop the killing, and would meet his obligations to stop the killing. Unfortunately, he hasn't met those obligations. President Bashir's actions over the past few weeks follow a long pattern of promising cooperation while finding new methods for obstruction.

One day after I spoke, the military bombed a meeting of rebel commanders designed to discuss a possible peace deal with the government. In following weeks, he used his army and government-sponsored militias to attack rebels and civilians in South Darfur. He's taken no steps to disarm these militias in the year since the Darfur peace agreement was signed. Senior officials continue to oppose the deployment of the U.N. peacekeeping force.

The result is that the dire security situation on the ground in Darfur has not changed. And so today, at my instruction, the United States has taken the steps I announced in April. First, the Department of Treasury is tightening U.S. economic sanctions on Sudan. With this new effort, the United States will more aggressively enforce existing sanctions against Sudan's government...
Good for President Bush.
May this be the start of the end of genocide in Darfur.

In response... China said they would take up the slack and support the Bashir Regime.
Hat Tip Chris Whitener

6 Comments:

Blogger Rob said...

Oh no, not sanctions! Anything but that!

7:08 AM  
Blogger Room 237 said...

I must admit that I just do not care any more. Iraq has made me decide that we should stay out of foriegn adventures. God help me, but even if it is a genocide, I cannot see sending Americans to possibly die there.

7:22 AM  
Blogger juandos said...

Well as long as George W personally leads the parade into Darfur with other like minded individuals I say, "good! go for it you compassionate conservative!"...

George Bush's Iraqi R.O.E. should've had Iraq looking like this ...

7:37 AM  
Blogger TM Lutas said...

Every civilized country has two honorable responses, engagement and isolation but they are only honorable if done properly. Setting up sanctions that just hurt the people but leave the regime as strong or stronger are no solution and engagement that does not promote changes in behavior, strengthening the oppressed, are no better.

I think that financial sanctions, barring certain companies from doing business with the US are one of the less malignant forms of sanctions and I would not be surprised if those 30 companies were owned by highly connected members of the regime in Khartoum. The PRC's engagement policy seems vague to me, so far. Are they promoting any sort of "code of conduct" in Sudan as the US did in South Africa when it was engaging the apartheid government? I doubt it but I would genuinely be happy if it turns out they are.

7:41 AM  
Blogger patrick neid said...

i said a few years back that the problem in darfur would be solved when everybody was dead. we are almost there. the UN has just a little more work to do.

10:32 AM  
Blogger Daniel said...

Was I the only one whose first thought was "man, those approval ratings must have slipped another notch"?

Time to distract people from Iraq again.

12:34 PM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home