With Al Qaeda Down... Baghdad Makes Plea To US Not to Surrender
Mohammed Fadhil from Iraq the Model writes a moving piece to America at the New York Daily News today:
A Baghdad plea: U.S. should stay and fight
I wasn't surprised when I saw Al Qaeda's second-in-command, Ayman al-Zawahiri, appear on Al Jazeera to announce America's defeat last week, not long after U.S. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid did. Zawahiri claims Al Qaeda has won, and Reid claims America has lost.Mohammed is not the only one begging America to stay in Iraq...
But from here in Baghdad, I see only a war that's still raging - with no victory in sight for Al Qaeda or any other entity. In fact, I see Al Qaeda on the ropes, losing support among my fellow Iraqis.
In the midst of such a fierce war, sending more wrong messages could only further complicate an already complicated situation. It would only create more of a mess inside Iraq - a mess that would then be exploited by Iran, Syria and Saudi Arabia for their own purposes: more iron-fisted control of the peoples and treasures of the region, more pushing the Middle East to crises and confrontations, and more spreading of their dark, backward ideologies.
And so, as an Iraqi, I say without hesitation: the American forces should stay here, and further reinforcements should be sent if the situation requires them. Not only that, these forces should be prepared to expand their operations whenever and wherever necessary to strike hard at the nests of evil that not only threaten Iraq and the Middle East, but seek to blackmail the whole world in the ugliest way through pursuing nuclear weapons.
It is up to us to show tyrants and murderers like Iran's Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Hezbollah's Hassan Nasrallah, Syria's Bashar Assad, and their would-be imitators who seek to control Iraq's people and wealth that we, the people, are not their possessions. They can't take out our humanity and they can't force us to back down.
The cost of liberating Europe in the last century was enormous in blood and treasure. In fact, it took half a century of American military presence thereafter to protect those nations from subsequent threats. If that made sense during a Cold War, and it did, then I don't understand why anyone would demand a pullout from Iraq (and maybe later, the entire Middle East) when the enemies are using every evil technique, from booby trapped dead animals to hijacked civilian aircrafts, to kill innocents.
Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari pleaded with America to not abandon his country this week.
MNF-I reported:
Last weekend a traffic jam several miles long snaked out of the Mansour district in western Baghdad. The delay stemmed not from a car bomb closing the road but from a queue to enter the city's central amusement park. The line became so long some families left their cars and walked to enjoy picnics, fairground rides and soccer, the Iraqi national obsession.Hat Tip Andy Stewart
Across the city, restaurants are slowly filling and shops are reopening. The streets are busy. Iraqis are not cowering indoors. The appalling death tolls from suicide attacks are often high because of crowding at markets. These days you are as likely to hear complaints about traffic congestion as about the security situation. Across Baghdad there is a cacophony of sirens from ambulances, firefighters and police providing public services. You cannot even escape the curse of traffic wardens ticketing illegally parked cars.
These small but significant snippets of normality are overshadowed by acts of gross violence, which fuel the opinion of some that Iraq is in a downward spiral. The Iraqi people are indeed suffering tremendous hardships and making grave sacrifices -- but daily life goes on for 7 million Baghdadis struggling to take back their capital and country.
So why should the world remain engaged in Iraq?
There is no denying the difficulties Iraq faces, and no amount of good news can obscure the demons of terrorism and sectarianism that have risen in my country. But there is too much at stake to risk failure, and everything to gain by helping us protect our hard-won democratic achievements and emerge as a stable, self-sustaining country.
We remain determined in spite of our losses. Spectacular attacks may dominate foreign headlines, but they cannot change the reality that Iraq has made steady political, economic and social progress over the past four years. We continue to strengthen our nascent democratic institutions, pursue national reconciliation and expand Iraqi security forces. The Baghdad security plan was conceived to give us breathing space to expedite political and economic development by "securing and holding" neighborhoods across the capital. There is no quick fix, but there have been real results: Winning public confidence has led to a spike in intelligence, a disruption of terrorist networks and the capture of key leaders, as well as the discovery of weapons caches. In Anbar province, Sunni sheikhs and insurgents have turned against al-Qaeda and to the side of Iraqi security forces. This would have been unthinkable even six months ago.




































6 Comments:
Omar needs to back away from the computer, and pick up a rifle. It's time for the Iraqis to pick up the pace.
That's Mohammed, not Omar.
I believe they are doing their part.
He is also a professional, if I remember correctly and they are far more valuable to Iraq's wellbeing doing their job and participating in the exchange of political ideas. There is not a shortage of police and army recruits given the time it takes to train and equip them. Building a nation or recovering from disasters takes time and progress unreported is not absence of progress. (I am not picking on rufus' comment - just expressing fatigue at the whole "where is the finish line?" meme. Finish lines are not visible at most steps on a marathon.)
But since the opinions of those Iraqis who do not explode and the opinions of their elected and accountable leaders are of no interest to anyone in the press/on the left, I would not expect writing like Mohammed's to change anyone's mind - but it might make congressmen think about whether it is better to do the right thing by Iraqis or the popular thing among people who get their news from moonbat land.
It reminds me of an article by Iraq Pundit about an Arab "pundit" living in the States who finds the desire of Iraqis for security and freedom to be amusing. The condescension rivals that of the anti-war crowd.
144 Iraqi Legislators just signed a letter/bill? asking the U.S. to leave.
Like I said, "Mohammed and Omar had better get their guns. That might be the only thing that keeps them from being "Dead Professionals."
I'm sure most of you boys have never been to a "rooster fight;" but, it takes a rooster about six or seven seconds to die. Well, Iraq is a dead rooster.
Cheney is over there trying to talk the parliament into not going on a two month vacation with nothing done and the U.S. losing two or three soldiers/marines every day. Anybody want to buy some Dinars?
What we are seeing is two things: 1) The Sadr Block realizing that when their Ministers stepped down they did, indeed, step down. The Kurds aren't going along with it and their voice, even as a minority, makes things like this very difficult to pass the Parliament. Sadr is doing his best to strongarm Parliament and he has gotten some help from,
2) The lovely political wisdom of the US trying to tell the Iraqi Parliament they shouldn't take the summer off. That coming from a Nation in which its Congress takes 3-day work weeks, limits its hours on work days, and takes lavish vacations in the spring, summer, fall and winter. Perhaps a bit less 'gravitas' from those jetting around all the time would be of some help. If we *mean* that Iraq has an independent Parliament then pushing for them to do things because we want it done a certain way is of no help at all, no matter if you have a D or R next to your name. We may not like how they run their Parliament. Tough. That is for Iraqis to decide for good or ill, not for the US.
That is part of helping others to stand up on their own: they make decisions to good and ill and we must learn to advise, not dictate to them. That is if we *mean* what we say about democracy and freedom.
Driving the final wedges into this insurgency is finally making it run out of places to go to. Iraqis on the tribal scale are organizing with the government and that is a direct threat to the current political parties that are National, not Provincial. The Provincial elections in a few of them will harm the National parties: mostly SCIRI and the Sadrists, plus the Badrists to a certain extent. al Anbar was declared 'lost' by many last year, and yet now the tribes are cleaning out al Qaeda which has to run *from* Anbar. The Sadrists are trying to make a stand mostly in Basra and a few parts of Diyala with al Qaeda. And the terrorists kill wantonly, without respect to clan, tribe, sect, ethnicity. Anything to kill and disrupt,no longer targeted well or at all.
The US can keep its high minded political insights and just quietly talk, not grandstand in that realm. We really have very little to talk about seeing we are heading into yet *another* do-nothing Congress. Democracy is hard to get going, which we seem to have forgotten. It is also hard to sustain, which we are now learning to our displeasure in the US.
Help when asked and offer advice quietly.
That befits a friend as that is how a friend acts when one they care for is in trouble. And we have, apparently, forgotten that, too.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home