HOT!... More Goods on the Latest Clinton Scandal! (Video)
This is HOT....
If you have 10 minutes, watch this riveting film clip put together by Peter Paul back in 2006.
The clip explains the details behind this latest and ongoing Clinton Scandal- "The Largest Election Law Fraud in History":
(Notice what is discussed at the 6:20 mark.)
In this video, David Schippers, Chief Council Clinton Impeachment, explains what Hillary's lawyers said (6:20 mark):
"No evidence, no evidence that Hillary was involved in any way whatsoever (with the fundraiser)."But, that just wasn't true.
And, yesterday's video release of Hillary on the phone with Peter Paul planning the event in July 2000 proves that what Hillary and her lawyer said about not being involved in the event was not true. The truth is that Hillary directly helped solicit and coordinate the mega-fundraiser.
Now... If you really want to get into the details of this latest Clinton scandal, you can wade through the muck at:
Hillcap.orgThese websites are all dedicated to the "Largest Election Law Fraud in History."
The Peter Paul vs Hillary and Bill Clinton Album
Equal Justice Foundation
Peter Paul
This week the Equal Justice Foundation released a tape of Hillary Clinton on speaker phone in July 17, 2000, on a call with Peter Paul. The videotape proves that Hillary Clinton was fully involved in the $1.2 million mega-fund-raiser paid for by Peter Paul on August 12, 2000. Hillary helped solicit and coordinate the Gala.
The tape was made by Peter F. Paul in his office on July 17, 2000, three days after Bill Clinton agreed to work for Paul as a rainmaker after he left the White House, if Paul would underwrite and produce the largest fundraising event for Hillary's Senate campaign.
Hillary later denied involvement with the event.
She even dissed Peter Paul in the Washington Post after the fundraiser on August 17, 2000 and then three days later sent him a sweet thank you letter!

August 18, 2000: Three days after telling the Washington Post ("Hillary Returns Bucks to Ex-Felon") that Peter Paul made no contribution to the August 12, 2000 Gala and that her campaign would not accept contributions from him, Hillary sent this letter to ensure Paul would not contradict her false story to the Post
Bill Clinton even hand wrote a message to Peter Paul thanking him:

On August 18, 2000: the same day that Hillary sends a special thank you to Paul, Bill sends a handwritten letter thanking Paul for the "boost" the "wonderful event gave Hillary's campaign". This note was intended to induce Paul not to dispute the false statements made by Hillary's campaign to the Washington Post on August 14 and August 16 regarding Paul's role with Hillary's Senate campaign.

(Click to Enlarge)
August 24, 2000: Seven days after the Washington Post publishes story that Clinton's spokesman announced the refund of Paul's $2,000 check to Hillary's campaign, and that no contributions would be accepted from Paul, Hillary's Finance Director Rosen asks Paul for $100,000 in stock to be transferred by his controller, Gordon, to Hillary's NY Working Family Party for Hillary.
Hillary Clinton has denied that she worked on this fundraiser with Paul. She has acted like she barely knows Peter Paul. The video released yesterday clearly shows the truth.
It does not look good for Hillary.
Previously:
Hillary Implicated In "Largest Election Law Fraud in History"




































8 Comments:
chirp chirp.....chirp chirp.
Great post Jim! Where's all the Liberal haters now?
Nothing to say now bbbb..boys???!!! :)
Oh evidence smevidence! Evidence is useless. Evidence is just like facts - they can be used to prove anything that is even remotely true. Let's not focus on the Democrats here.
"With great power comes great responsibility."
WTG!
Now Stan Lee can know *just* how Peter Parker felt...
Ya gotta love the PIAPS!
if you're MAD
punish your country
- VOTE for Hillary
.
Now you understand why there is such a great push to silence any media outlet that does not tow the Democratic party line. They need to control the gatekeepers of information. They already control the MSM and they thought they could ignore talk radio by calling them all sorts of names and having the MSM ignore what they bring up. Unfortunately for them there are too many who listen to talk radio and the pressure from them makes it hard to ignore. Once they get done with talk radio they will be coming after the bloggers on the internet I can assure you.
Just remember that the Democrats read Orwell's "1984" not as a warning but as an instruction manual.
We have been fighting for a long time to get the press to report this. Our documentary film will hopefully be out soon, and finally Hillary and a whole cast of characters are going to under oath this year in Paul v Clinton. This YouTube treatment will explain so that even lazy journalists can understand - http://youtube.com/watch?v=qcbg72tK_ks Thanks for the help in advancing this story.
...Doug from Upland
On February 11, 1998 Mrs.Clinton appeared in the White House Map Room to present a global cybercast with a live video feed, a first. During the presentation and a question about the instantaneousness of the Internet, Hillary replied:
"As exciting as these new developments are-and I think Greg's enthusiasm is shared broadly by Americans and people around the world-there are a number of serious issues. Without any kind of editing function or gatekeeping function, what does it mean to have the right to defend your reputation, or to respond to what someone says?
There used to be this old saying that the lie can be halfway around the world before the truth gets out of bed to find its boots. I mean, it's just beyond imagination what can be disseminated. So I think we're going to have to really worry about this...
(W)e always have to keep competing interests in balance...Anytime and individual or an institution or an invention leaps so far out ahead of that balance and throws a system, whatever it might be-political, economic, technological-out of balance, you've got a problem...So we're going to have to deal with that."
Here is the latest.
...dfu
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1873379/posts?page=40
WHEN I CUT AND PASTED FROM MY ORIGINAL, I DIDN'T CLOSE A LINK. HERE ARE THE CORRECTIONS.
May 2005 - Rosen acquitted in criminal trial in Los Angeles ...the perjury in
this trial was astounding...the judge and prosecutor went out of their way to condemn Paul and claim that Hillary had nothing to do with it is also astounding...
http://www.hillcap.org/images/fbi_affidavit_may_12_2002.pdf FBI
affidavit during the trial documenting $1.2 mil from Paul that was not declared. The prosecution does not call Paul, Aaron Tonken, or key witness
Kelly Craighead (Craighead was also never called by the FEC - she will be a key witness in Paul v Clinton).... The prosecution does not use damaging evidence against Rosen obtained while Ray Reggie (brother in law of Ted Kennedy) was wearing a wire. In Tonken's book, KING OF CONS, he details
how he sat in a van with Hillary
detailing all of the money that was being spent on her.http://tinypic.com/4h06utj.png
Dec 2005 - FEC determines that the campaign deliberately underreported
$721,000, fines the campaign a mere $35,000, and orders a new
filing...treasurer Andrew Grossman signs conciliation
agreement with the FEC, the equivalent of a nolo contendre plea. href="http://www.hillcap.org/default.php?page_id=53
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home