It took several minutes for the chopper to lift off.
Calev Ben-David was our guide. Calev was a journalist for over 20 years including a stint as managing editor of The Jerusalem Post. His column "Snap Judgement" had hundreds of thousands of readers around the world. Today Calev works for The Israel Project guiding visitors to Israel on Intellicopter Tours.
Calev Ben-David on the microphone in back next to Nir T. Boms, a writer for the Washington Times, and Scott Johnson from Powerline get ready for take off.
The Israel Project website says that through its Jerusalem office, TIP operates helicopter tours over Israel called "Intellicopter" tours. The two-and a-half-hour guided helicopter tours give reporters a feel for the situation on the ground in Israel, the West Bank and Gaza. The tours educate journalists about security threats and how Israel manages the security threats from the West Bank and Gaza. The tours concentrate on the security fence and barrier wall.
The Israel Project have flown hundreds of journalists from more than 140 media outlets on the "Intellicopter" tours, including top journalists from the United States, England, France,Germany, Russia, Italy, Latin, America, Australia and Asia.
Our small group of four US bloggers, an Israeli journalist working with the Washington Times, a America's Voices in Israel representative, two pilots from the IDF, and our two tour guides took off from Herziliya.
It was a surprisingly smooth ride as we head east towards the West Bank and over the Israeli city of Kfar Saba that is only separated from the Palestinian town of Qalqiliya by about half a mile. It was surprising to see the Israeli-Palestinian towns nestled so close to each other.
In this shot the Palestinian town in the West Bank is on the left and the red roof homes in the Israeli town are on the right. A separation wall was built between the two towns.
Here is a close look at the two towns as we flew over.
The photos make it look like it was a cloudy day. It wasn't. It was just the oppressive heat and the helicopter window that made it look cloudy.
One thing that surprised me a bit was that the "apartheid" wall, as Jimmy Carter might be inclined to call it, does not span the whole West Bank. The wall is built up between Israeli and Palestinian towns. Once you get outside the towns the wall becomes a fence again. In fact, 97% of the separation barrier is a fence system and not a wall.
In the above photo you can see the wall ending just outside the Palestinian town in the West Bank. The wall is built high enough so that no one can shoot down on traffic or civilians on the Israeli side.
Since September 2000 over 25,000 terror attacks took place inside Israel, most of them directed at civilians. Over 1,060 civilians including women, children and babies were killed in the attacks according to Israeli Ministry of Defense.
This spectacular shot shows the barrier wall and a lookout point for Israeli soldiers on the West Bank. The wall is 8.5 meters (28 feet tall).
Here is a long section of the wall on the outskirts of a Palestinian town. After the wall was built in 2003 there were only 3 "successful" terrorist attacks inside Israel in 2004. There was a drop by over 90% in the terror attacks compared to previous years.
What has also helped tremendously in the reduction of terrorist attacks on Israel are the checkpoints set up inside the West Bank where the movement of the Palestinian people is monitored and managed.
After we flew across Israel to the West Bank and down to Jerusalem, we flew back across the country towards Gaza.
We landed in the town of Sderot near the northern tip of Gaza and drove over to an army post not far from the fence separating Gaza from Israel. It was at this post that Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit was kidnapped by Hamas in June 2006. Hamas dug a 3 kilometer long tunnel under the separation fence and behind the post that this photo was taken from. During the morning attack, two IDF soldiers were killed and three others wounded, aside from Shalit, who himself suffered a broken left hand and a light shoulder wound after his tank was hit with an RPG. Israeli forces believe that Gilad and his captors walked back over this field and disappeared inside this Gaza town. Gilad Shalit has not been seen since that morning.
We then drove into the nearby town of Sderot. In the first six months of 2006 after Israel withdrew completely from Gaza, there were 500 Qassam rocket attacks on Sderot. The city started collecting the rockets and has them stashed out back of the police station.
In the final months of 2006 through June 2007 300 Qassams were fired on Sderot. This rocket was fired on Sderot a couple of days before we arrived.
After our drive through Sderot we headed back to the chopper for a nice sweaty picture in the sun before we flew back north near the coast to Tel Aviv. The tour took two and a half hours and we traveled over a large part of the country.
Two days after we left an elementary school was hit by a Qassam rocket. The following day a military wing of Hamas vowed that the rocket attacks would continue.
MORE... Scott Johnson wrote more about our trip to Gaza and a view from "the fence" at Powerline this week.
Just how many of those red roofed domiciles being occupied by Palestinians were built and financed soley by Palestinians?
ReplyDeleteHow many were built by external funds?
What I really wonder is how many American tax dollars were wasted on those domiciles?
"What I really wonder is how many American tax dollars were wasted on those domiciles?"
ReplyDeleteI of the opinion that the amount is staggering - kinda makes you wonder if the stick rather than the carrot might make a better approach.
Lao
An American Expat in Southeast Asia
Well I had to wonder about Lao comment regarding the stick & carrot...
ReplyDeleteSo I go to the US AID site and find out the following: Since 1993, Palestinians have received more than $1.7 billion in U.S. economic assistance via USAID projects - more than from any other donor country
Hmmm, one wonders just how much of that amount are tax dollars extorted from American citizens (I'm guessing most all of it if not all of it) and I'm also wondering just how many bridges in this country could've been repaired or rebuilt for that kind of money?
Forty years ago when U.N. Resolution 242 was drafted, its architects understood that peacemaking required balance. Israel would have to compromise, but its diplomacy should not undermine the delicate strategic balance in the Middle East with a radical pullout that would leave it excessively vulnerable. Effective diplomacy today requires striking the same careful balance -- seizing opportunities for real peace, but granting Israel its right to defensible borders.
ReplyDelete--The Dangers of 'Peace'-Making, DORE GOLD, WSJ, August 11, 2007
One of your guides (on the ground) during your Homesick American tour, Dore Gold, had this piece in the Journal yesterday. Did you guys see it? If not, that paragraph should suffice. It's packed chock full with enough sappy, pollyannish misunderstandings of the historical facts - and their consequences - to choke a horse. But what I like most is this shtarker's wish to see the world "granting Israel its right to defensible borders." That's enough to make a grown man cry.
Per capita aid to Israel has always been far higher than to the Palestinians, and by most measures, Israel is a developed country.
ReplyDelete++
ReplyDeleteUnited States Aid to the Palestinians (2005)
excerpt:
[United States economic assistance for the Palestinians has averaged about $85 million per year since Israel and the PLO signed the 1993 Declaration of Principles. Congress wants to ensure that U.S. assistance is used for legitimate humanitarian projects and that no U.S. aid is diverted for military or terrorist use against Israel. United States Aid to the Palestinians provides a description of the aid program and tables with annual amounts for the Palestinians.]
U.S. Aid to the Palestinians (2006)
excerpt:
[With the recent success of Hamas at the polls, many observers have cautioned that continued foreign assistance to the Palestinian Authority (PA) may be at risk due to Hamas’ commitment to the destruction of the state of Israel and its designation as a terrorist group by the United States. Currently, the Palestinians are the largest per capita recipients of foreign aid worldwide and, with a shattered economy, are completely dependent on external support to meet basic needs. Without Western aid, a Hamas-led government may be forced to rely completely on donations from wealthy Arab Gulf states or from Iran. On the other hand, the prospect of losing U.S. and European aid may force Hamas to tone down its radical views and accept Israel’s right to exist. In the meantime, foreign donors have been cautious, demanding that Hamas renounce the use of violence and recognize Israel while withholding a complete cessation of aid programs pending the formation of a new Palestinian government.]
USAID West Bank & Gaza
==
Hey Grumpy, what's your point with this: "Per capita aid to Israel has always been far higher than to the Palestinians, and by most measures, Israel is a developed country"...
ReplyDeleteWhat have those worthless, pathological killers that the Paleoswine done for us or anyone else?
Just how many of those red roofed domiciles (Israeli) being occupied by Palestinians were built and financed soley by Palestinians?
ReplyDeleteProbably none. Money given to Palestine doesn't reach Israel. Palestinians are less and less involved in building as a result of the first Intifada - they became too unreliable, too expensive and too dangerous.
How many were built by external funds? Probably none. Israelis tend to work, get on with their lives, borrow from family and take bank loans.
What I really wonder is how many American tax dollars were wasted on those domiciles? Personally I would be pleased if American tax dollars were used to build Palestinian housing. As it is, in the best case the $'s do into corrupt Palestinian pockets. In the worst case they finance arms purchases.
Grumpy Old Man said...
ReplyDeletePer capita aid to Israel has always been far higher than to the Palestinians, and by most measures, Israel is a developed country.
Israel could always claim that America received quid pro quo by providing reliable military presence that would otherwise require more expensive American troops; by combat testing and improving American weaponry; by providing reseach for Intel, Motorola, Microsoft and dozens of others leading to American manufacturing jobs; by research in medicine, biology and agriculture improving the lives of millions; by printing more books in Arabic than the rest of the Middle East combined; by buying American products; by remaining a liberal, Pro-American democracy at war, etc.
What was it you say that the Palestinians give in return for the money they receive?????
Heya GP, please could you upload the full quality photographs you took in Sderot?
ReplyDeleteWe need to band together for the nation of Israel israelians are not killing innocent people, they are trying to survive since 1948 in a land that other nations donot care about but want to see the destruction of a group of people please do not forget Hitler and remember the head of the PLO Yassar arafat was involved with nazi Germany also sadam Hussein who's father I believe was a Nazi during WWII. I continue to pray for peace in the middle east and hope that the USA continues to support israel if not God will take his hands of this great country which the same people who want Israel destroyed want us to do not forget 911
ReplyDeleteIsrael has a right to defend its country and we need to support their right Now I just heard that they want no prayer at the Inauguration What kind of country have we become where people can redefine marriage and take prayer and English out of this great land obviously I am not a Liberal and did not vote for a man who I know would not support israel Most of those people who were at NYC looked like middle eastern men/woman could these be the same people who hate us yet enjoy our freedom of speech why are they defending palestine and Iran remember iran wants the USA gone and of course. WWII and the killing of millions never happened why dont they go back to their homeland and have a rally this makes me SICK as an American thanks all TINA BARRETT
ReplyDelete