And to think, all of those hours out in the freezing snow for that photo op were for naught.
Daily Tech reported on the latest scientific findings:
NASA has now silently released corrected figures, and the changes are truly astounding. The warmest year on record is now 1934. 1998 (long trumpeted by the media as record-breaking) moves to second place. 1921 takes third. In fact, 5 of the 10 warmest years on record now all occur before World War II.Oops!
Michelle Malkin has more.
** If you can stomach it... Here's global hottie Al Gore testifying for 37 long boring grandiose minutes in front of Congress on the upcoming mudslides.
** So does this mean that jihad is not caused by global warming?
** Does this mean that global warming is no longer a threat to national security?
** Will duck hunting disappear in the Midwest?
** Will chipmunks quit their migration?
** Will all bees die?
** Will the Gulf of Mexico reach up into Missouri, flooding all along the Missouri and Mississippi Rivers?
Bush critic General Anthony Zinni: "It's not hard to make the connection between climate change and instability, or climate change and terrorism."
Quick, someone call the general!
Who promoted Zinni to General? I have a feeling it was the same guy who promoted Capt. Crunch and Colonel Mustard.
ReplyDeleteSheesh, what a maroon!
2005-very active hurricane season...
ReplyDeleteso 2006 was predicted to be even worse. But it wasn't.
2007? "it is going to be really bad...well not as bad as originally predicted, and after further revision, not as bad as the revised prediction, but we are going to get hit."
Now we come to findout that natural forces, not factored into predictions have kept global warming down.
"But it is going to start back up in 2009..."
given the success at forecasting hurricanes, combined with the certainty put forth by the experts-
no one can predict the weather- not a week from now, and definitely not 2 years ahead.
Ode to Environmentalists
ReplyDeleteAll have come
And all have passed
Think thee now are mightiest?
Can you will the rain to fall?
Wind to blow?
Turn spring to fall?
Even with your greatest power
You are less than bird and flower.
In a Lotus of the Indra
We are but a tiny ember.
Soon this age will pass away
Can you will your self to stay?
Nice Beto.
ReplyDeleteThanks.
The reason 2009 will see an increase in GW is that's year one of Lady Hillary's reign of terror. The liberal left will once again fund only that science they agree with just as they did during the Clinton/Gore years.
ReplyDeleteGore so politicized NASA that the agency has become a joke in scientific circles.
So, those predicting an increase in GW after 2009 will see it rise from the same place that 99.9% of GW occurs today - from bogus data massaged by some political "scientist" prostituting themselves for government funding.
Hey Beto that little diddy of yours, very cool if you'll pardon the pun... Good stuff!
ReplyDeleteSo what are the odds of these die hard believers in the myth of human induced climate change will take up the following?
The Web site junkscience.com is offering $100,000 to the first person who can prove that humans are responsible for harmful climate change. The Ultimate Global Warming Challenge says — "If you think it's a no-brainer that humans are causing catastrophic global warming, here's your opportunity to earn an easy $100,000."
Global Warming and verse
ReplyDeleteA rose(wilting) is a rose (wilting) was a rose (Wilted)
One can predict that New Orleans will sink! Of course that has been going on since before mankind really got to do anything there... it was sinking before the city was there and has been ever since the glaciers retreated. That is something, in reality, that we really should address because it is happening anyways. The works of man haven't helped but not in the GW way, just in the normal course of events when we don't consider the delta as a system.
ReplyDeleteThat is all too common for mankind, apparently, and America is not exempt from it.
It occurs to me climate change has the potential to push agricultural and population centers around, thereby allowing sections of the planet to lie fallow and thereby renew, but at a pace slow enough for our mobile population to adapt.
ReplyDeleteValerie