Click to Enlarge (image condensed)
Newsbusters noticed that the speech posted on his website is not the same disgusting speech that Schumer gave to the US Senate. It has been changed.
Shame-Shame!
YouTube has the speech HERE.
This is what Schumer said:
And let me be clear. The violence in Anbar has gone down in spite of the Surge, not because of the Surge.And, this is the remake of the same speech on his website:
The inability of American soldiers to protect these tribes from Al Qaeda said to these tribes, "We have to fight Al Qaeda ourselves."
And let me be clear: the violence in Anbar has gone down despite the surge, not because of the surge.Senator Schumer, you are not only pathetic in your attacks against the troops during wartime-
The lack of protection for these tribes from al Qaeda made it clear to these tribes, "We have to fight al Qaeda ourselves."
You are a coward, Senator!
Sweetness and Light was first to catch the deletion.
HotAir has more.
As if I didn't already think he was beyond despicable. I asked how he could sleep at night: http://chatterboxchronicles.blogspot.com/2007/09/how-does-chuck-schumer-sleep-at-night.html
ReplyDeleteAnd now he knows how disgusting the speech was so he modifies it, unbelievable!! Great catch Jim!!
Well now you got to give the libtard ambulance chaser a break here...
ReplyDeleteAlledgedly there is a medical reason for liberals being a scatter brained and liars...
According to David Amodio of New York University and Frank J. Sulloway, a researcher at UC Berkeley's Institute of Personality and Social Research there is this: Research suggests that liberals and conservatives have different personality traits and "cognitive styles": while liberals are more intellectually curious and tolerant of ambiguity, conservatives have a greater desire to reach decisions quickly and are more consistent in the way they make those decisions
The story runs in the Los Angeles Times so it must be true, right?...
BTW the sample size was 43 people...
ROFLMAO!
It is what amoral weasels do. What's the surprise?
ReplyDeleteHe can disparage our troops on the floor of the Senate only because the Senate has slightly over 50% capacity of dirtbags. He isn't worthy of emptying any soldier's bedpan, never mind not having the moral strength to stand by his own words.
ReplyDeleteWere he to say the same thing at WRAMC, he'd likely not escape with his life. But then again, he doesn't have the cojones to do so.
He's a dirtbag. He's a moral coward. And he's a hero to the MoveOn.org crowd.
Diggs Cleveland
Major, US Army
Retired
What Schumer and his staff don't understand is that you can revise and extend (or redact) your remarks all you want nowadays, but in a world of YouTube, your actual comments on the Senate floor are out there for anyone to listen to by just Googling the right words and clicking on the proper link. And odds are more people are going to view the video then are ever going to read his bogus transcript.
ReplyDeleteDemocrats started the last civil war too.
ReplyDeleteSchumer = Treason
It was just his turn, or maybe Dirtbag Durbin was busy that day.
ReplyDelete++
ReplyDeleteDiggs @ 5:14 AM
He's a moral coward. And he's a
hero to the MoveOn.org crowd.
so true, reminded me of this..
THE LEFT THINKS LEGALLY, THE RIGHT THINKS MORALLY
albeit they've done little to nothing in legislation, they have started well over 300 investigations since they took over in 06..
come to think on it.. they like to start things
(Iraq War), but seem to fear finishing (cut &
run) them, go figure..
==
Add 50,000 more troops to Iraqi Theater
ReplyDeleteTry this logic out for size. If, when we added 20,000 troops and the strategy of "clear and hold" accomplished stability in those regions, then another 50,000 for a six month all out "super-surge" just might do the trick. Of course, the only way to add these numbers to the theater would mean deploying troops stationed in other parts of the world that would weaken the strategic positions for a short period of time. It would be like moving all your houses and hotels onto Boardwalk and banking on your opponent to land there. Once is all it would take and blammo, game over.
But this is not a game, I know. The real game is going on in congress with the democrats attempting to find some footing as to what's the next best thing to their cut-n-run policy that has failed as miserably as the Move-ON ad in the New York Times. Questioning the integrity of a 4-Star General with impeccable credentials may not have been the most brilliant move the Soro's/Anti-war crowd has made, but it sure puts their feet (stance) firmly in the cement. We know exactly where these cowards stand. And there's a bunch of democrats standing on the edge just waiting to see how deep the hole is before they decide to step in........
Linked and track-backed the old fasioned way here