Rudy Giuliani continues to attack Hillary's support of MoveOn.org:
After his discounted ad in The New York Times, the Giuliani Campaign posted this internet ad today.
Our Nation Deserves Better...
Our nation deserves better!
Yes it certainly does.
Hillary Clinton needs to apologize to the troops!
But instead Hillary defended her attacks on General Petraeus today.
Via Drudge and WCBS:
"It's hardly surprising that Mayor Giuliani is running the first negative ad of the '08 campaign, given his inability to justify his unqualified support for President Bush's failed Iraq strategy."Hillary must have been dozing during General Petraeus's testimony this week or she would know better.
She needs to apologize for her attack on Petraeus.
Or, she'll prabably face more on this...
The COERCION PHOTO shows that this soldier has been thru Survival School and learned his lessons well. He's giving the sign of "coercion" with his left hand. These hand signs are taught in survival school to be used by POW's as a method of posing messages back to our intelligence services who may view the photo or video. This guy was obviously being coerced into shaking hands with Hillary Clinton. It's ironic how little she knew that he would so inform us about the photo---perhaps because she's never understood our military to begin with.
* * * * *
Vietnam hero John McCain also attacked MoveOn.org for their disgusting attack on General Petraeus:
Sen. John McCain holds an ad concerning the war in Iraq, during a rally at a Veterans of Foreign Affairs post in East Rochester, N.H., Thursday, Sept. 13, 2007. (AP Photo/Cheryl Senter)
++
ReplyDeletethe expression on the soldiers face in the
coercion photo is absolutely priceless.. :)
i know Rudy said he would not let Hillary off
the hook till she apologized.. and/but looks
like McCain isn't about to either..
however, i'm having a problem understanding why only Hillary, why not Obama (not that having anything to do with either Soros or MoveOn should be a requirement for any of the Dems to condemn the despicable ad, which should have been a given), or any of the others??
excerpt:
[As for the U.S. 2008 presidential race, Mr. Soros, who gave $18 million to Democratic advocacy groups seeking to defeat President Bush in 2004, said he supported Barack Obama. But he also said he would support Hillary Clinton if she won the Democratic nomination. John McCain, he said, had “compromised far too much with the Bush administration” and was unlikely to win the Republican nomination. And who will win? Mr. Soros said he thinks the leading possibilities are former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney and former New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani.]
what do ya know, something Soros
& i agree on, who'd a thunk it.. :D
==
My husband was in Baghdad with the 82nd for that meeting that Hillary was at. In fact, he set it up and we have some interesting photos. Most of the guys felt the same way that soldier did. The military is not a fan of Hillary.
ReplyDeleteThis is the #1 issue, in my mind, why Hillary Clinton lacks all credibility.
ReplyDeleteShe made a committment to the Iraqi people. She stated removing Saddam Hussein was the right thing to do.
Hillary said she based this decision on over 10 years of researching intelligence and Saddam Hussein's non-compliance to inspections. Hillary never said she based her decision on George W. Bush.
She owns this decision to approve the Iraq War, but now she plays politics with American Soldier's and Iraqi's lives?
Have you watched Hillary's speech to Code Pink 2 weeks before the Iraq War began in March 2003?
http://youtube.com/watch?v=cZcY6TGfAxE
==============================
Hillary Clinton to Code Pink:
Quote:
"There's a very easy way to prevent anyone from being put into harm's way and that is for Saddam Hussein to disarm and I have absolutely no belief that he will."
"I have to say that this is something I've followed for a DECADE. If he were serious about disarming he would have been much more forthcoming. "
"... And, the very difficult question is for all of us is how does one bring about the disarmament of someone with such a proven track record of a commitment if not an obsession of weapons of mass destruction?"
Quote:
Quote from Hillary Clinton to Code Pink:
"I'm talking specifically about what HAD to be done in Bosnia and Kosovo,
where my husband
could not get a Security Council Resolution to save the Kosovar Albanians from ethnic cleansing,
and WE DID IT ALONE
AS THE UNITED STATES WE HAD TO DO IT ALONE............
I'm happy, in the face of such horrible suffering, we did act."
===============================
Hillary supported the UNILATERAL removal of Saddam Hussein 100%.
Hillary based her decision on over "10 years of intelligence" on Saddam Hussein NOT George W. Bush.
Hillary said she based her unilateral "go it alone" approval of the Iraq War also on her "husband's" unilateral "go it alone" attitude in Kosovo!
Hillary also knew the stakes and that if we did invade Iraq we would be in Iraq for at least 10 years.
She is a despicable human-being. Any Liberal that says Bush "lied" to go to war with Saddam is a hypocrite if they still support Hillary Clinton.
Hillary loved the idea of Bosnia and Kosovo and pressed hubby to do something about them while she was 'Co-President' with him. And such lovely, glowing ideas of the National Leaders in the US pulling together to help these people... apparently those high-minded ideals only apply there.
ReplyDeleteDid she ever have to have 'the willing suspension of disbelief' with any other 4-star that she met or heard while in the White House? She, by her own accounts, did get a say in things and that would require some knowledge of meetings held... In any event, what a fine thing to put forth as a Presidential candidate: that she finds the reporting of one of the best trained, most well schooled and most capable military leaders of our time to need 'a willing suspension of disbelief' while he reports on the state of things involving the Armed Forces to those in charge of the Committees that oversee the funding of this entire affair. If she can't take such reports as a Senator, I shudder to think of how she will treat the Armed Forces as President.
I have not seen much about this issue, but Hillary’s recent insult of General Petraeus (and I don’t think there is much worse of an insult than being called liar by a Clinton -Bill or Hill) only emphases this issue. Everyone seems to agree (or at least say they do - that we need to increase our military, especially our special ops. I am not connected to the military, but I have to believe that if the anti-military Clintons become the next president again, that there will be a substantial decline in those interested in enlisting and, particularly re-enlisting in the military. Any perspective on this from people in the military??
ReplyDeletemullah cimoc say Giuliani him make big ashame for all ameriki.
ReplyDeletehim take him slut to live in government house while still the marry? Am this "conservative value" ameriki?
him business partner kerrick Giuliani almost make the homeland security czar all usa but now the investigate of the whores and the rich man condos on policeman salary. Am him the clean police? Conservative values ameriki?
him to serving the homosexual and disobey him bible, but still acting the proud. him to wanting man to marry man, man to marry donkey, and woman to marry the woman. so sick and show the destroy of ameriki society.
him Giuliani to obey every command of masters in tel aviv. him like puppet on fish line. am this make the geo. washington and benjamin frankling proud?
now the republican all ameriki learn of him the gay homosexual like the kink sex act, corruption and cruel---truth now just opposite---not the family value, this the filthy corruption and amerika to be suffer maybe the earthquaking so terrible?
for him true info: stop1984now@yahoo.com for him aemriki learn.