
Patrick Kennedy decides to give his money back.
Tennessee Democratic Party and Harold Ford Jr. won't give it back.
NORMAN HSU SKIPS BAIL HEARING!
Hsu forfeits $2 million!

Norman Hsu, center, leaves a San Mateo County jail with Jason Booth, left, and attorney Somnath Raj Chatterjee, right, in Redwood City, Calif., Friday, Aug. 31, 2007. Hsu, a top Democratic fundraiser wanted as a fugitive in California, turned himself in Friday to face a grand theft charge. After reports surfaced this week of Hsu's fugitive status in California, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, (D-NY) joined other candidates in returning thousands of dollars Hsu raised. (AP Photo/Paul Sakuma)
A new warrant has been issued for his arrest!
This was just reported at the Fresno Bee:
Democratic fundraiser Norman Hsu (SHOO) has failed to appear for a bail hearing in Redwood City.Do you suppose the Chinese gang members have kidnapped him again?
Hsu forfeits the $2 million bail he posted last week. A judge has issued a new warrant for his arrest.
Hsu's lawyer says he doesn't know where he is.
Hsu has been a fugitive in California for 15 years during which time he became a top donor to Democratic candidates, including presidential contenders Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama.
Hsu pleaded no contest in 1991 to a felony count of grand theft, admitting he'd defrauded investors of $1 million in a bogus investment scam.
Prosecutors say he was facing up to three years in prison when he skipped town before being sentenced.
(Do the Clintons belong to a Chinese gang?)
Dan Riehl thinks he may be heading back to Hong Kong.
The NYT says he was supposed to turn in his passport on Monday:
On Monday, Mr. Hsu was required to turn his passport over to the court, but he told court officials that he had not been able to find it then. Mr. Brosnahan said they were hoping Mr. Hsu would bring it to court with him today.Guess not.
Today's Examiner editorial wonders how on earth a guy flees the country after pleading no contest to felony grand theft charges for running a $1 million Ponzi scheme in California, then shows up 15 years later in New York as one of the brightest fund raising stars of the Democratic Party.
Good question.
"The curious largesse of Norman Hsu"
It also makes you wonder if there are any connections to the Chinagate scandal.
But, with Hsu missing- We may never know!
Ken Garcia also has an article on Hsu in today's Examiner:
There aren’t a lot of people who can afford to put up the cash for a $2 million bail, but clearly there aren’t a lot of people like Hsu.Michelle Malkin is following the democratic fugitive story.
He was facing three years in jail before vanishing after his grand theft plea in what prosecutors said was a Ponzi scheme to hoodwink investors. Indeed, the attorney who handled the original case said Hsu essentially stole $1 million — which must seem like peanuts to all the people he’s managed to convince in the ensuing years to give generously to their (and his) favorite candidates.
Prosecutors have said they believed Hsu fled to Hong Kong after entering his grand theft plea, which involved a business in which he raised money from investors to import latex gloves from Asia. He was listed as a managing director of a Hong Kong-based exporter, but just about everything involving him in the last decade remains a mystery.
He has told people who knew him in New York that he was working in the fashion industry, but many key groups involved in the apparel business say they’ve never heard of him. Still, it hasn’t stopped many prominent supporters from going to bat for him. Bob Kerrey, the former Nebraska senator now serving as the head of New School University in New York, insisted that Hsu is a clothing designer, which may explain why he placed him on the university’s board of trustees. But Hsu resigned that post last week after the fundraising allegations surfaced.
For a guy who was apparently running from the law, Hsu may be a record-holder as the nation’s highest-profile fugitive. He’s raised money for candidates on both coasts, including San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom, and contributed to District Attorney Kamala Harris’ campaign; he’s also been very active in New York State politics, giving more than $50,000 to the state Democratic Party.
It’s too early to tell what kind of impact his role will have on national Democratic politics, but clearly the ripples are widening. Several of the candidates who enjoyed Hsu’s financial support are now backing away from him, saying they will give his contributions to charity. Yet there’s little doubt that investigators are anxious to dig deep into Hsu’s fundraising operation, especially in light of his shady past.
Clarice Feldman has more on Hsu today at the American Thinker.
Previously:
Surprise!... Lawsuit Ties Clintons to Shady Marketing Firm
Hillary Implicated In "Largest Election Law Fraud in History"
WANTED: Major Hillary Campaign Contributor & Swindler
WANTED: Another Hillary Donor- This One Is Sought By FBI!!
More Bum News For Hillary... Hsu Named in 1996 Communist China Donations Scandal
Democrats Hit By Hsu-nami... Hillary Donor Case Goes to Court!
Hsu-nami News: Norman Hsu Linked to China Missile Trader
Woops! Another Illegal Donor For Hillary Clinton- From Japan
MORE: SFGate- His attorney team talked with Hsu this morning:
Brosnahan said someone from his team had been in contact with Hsu a few hours before the 9 a.m. hearing, but he declined to comment on whether that contact was by phone or other means.Midwest Engineer writes in to say this on Hsu- "Shark bait."
FOX News has video from the court house this morning.
Update 2: The American Spectator has more on the mysterious Norman Hsu:
In campaign finance reports, Hsu's companies are listed as: Next Components Ltd., Cool Planets Ltd., Because Men's Clothes, and Dilini Management. But none of the companies have online footprints or appear in fashion industry directories that I have searched. The only official recognition of any of these companies that I have found is Next Components, in the form of a filing for a certificate of corporation with the New York Department of State, Division of Corporations -- but even that doesn't hold up to closer scrutiny. The filing was from May 6, 2005, and when I called the Division of Corporations, a representative there told me that the filing needed to be renewed every two years for a fee of $9, but Next Components never responded to the renewal notice.
The filing lists 561 Seventh Ave., Suite 1301 as the address for Next Components, but I called Handro Properties, the management company that runs the building, and was told that not only have they never heard of Next Components, but "Suite 1301" doesn't even exist.
As I reported yesterday, it turns out that an address Hsu listed in his campaign finance filings—455 Fifth Ave.—is the site of the Mid-Manhattan Library. I had a friend of mine who is a real estate broker in New York look into yet another address he listed—160 Wooster St., Apt 3C. That apartment does exist and it's a luxury 2 bedroom that sold for $1.85 million in June of 2004. However, it was sold again for an undisclosed price on November 15, 2005, and FEC records show that Hsu made political donations from that address both before and after that date. So unless he sold the apartment to himself, it's another unusual piece to the rather bizarre puzzle that is Norman Hsu.
http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/09/fund_raising_corruption_in_the_1.html
ReplyDeleteI suppose Matt Yglesias, of "Republicans are waaaaaaaaay more corrupt than Democrats" fame, is all over this.
ReplyDeleteQuestions & Observations:
ReplyDelete1) A guy who is obviously a multimillionaire is asked to post bond for $2 million. You get your money back if you show up for court. So why, unless he was planning to run, did he asked to have it reduced?
2) A guy who is posting bail, who is supposed to hand in his passport, claims he can't find it. If he didn't satisfy the requirements why did they let him out on bail?
3) The guy's already run once before. Why would they trust him a second time?
Aren't these 3 things dead giveaways that once he's out on bail he's planning to run, and wants to keep as much cash on hand as possible?
And who, I wonder, is Judge H. James Ellis and why would he allow an obvious scofflaw - who's JUMPED BAIL BEFORE - out on bail with his passport so that he can flee again?
What are Judge Ellis's political inclinations? Is he just plain stupid; is he sticking stubbornly to the letter of the law; or did he want Hsu gone so that his court case wouldn't be in the news embarrassing the Democrats for the next year or so?
I suspect the latter, though it's only speculation.
But it could backfire. Say Hsu flees to Hong Kong. Say we find him. What if the Chinese government then refuses to extradite him? That could really turn embarrassing for both the Dems and the Chinese. It could raise the messy issue of foreign intereference in US politics for the 2008 elections.
That would be a valuable discussion to have, one that would benefit Republicans and, for obvious reaons, not be helpful to Hillary.
The Justice Department is staffed by retards or Clintonites.
ReplyDeleteI'll bet the latter.
So does this mean Patrick Kennedy is still going to keep his Hsu "donations"?
ReplyDeleteAnd if I may continue to snark, maybe he is hoping for the Marc Rich treatment in the future...?
Repeat after me: Bernard L. Schwartz.
ReplyDeleteBernard L. Schwartz.
Bernard L. Schwartz.
Bernard L. Schwartz put Norman Hsu on the Board of Trustees of The New School:
http://www.newschool.edu/administration.html
Bernard L. Schwartz parties down at fundraisers with Norman Hsu:
http://www.creators.com/opinion/robert-novak/will-newt-run.html
A further 144,000 pages at Google listing both their names [up from 109,000 when the scandal broke]:
http://www.google.com/search?safe=off&q=%2BBernard+%2BSchwartz++%2BNorman+%2BHsu
And, of course, Bernard L. Schartz taught the Chicoms how to build missiles that could make their way out of the lower atmosphere, giving rise to Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles which could reach the continental United States and anti-satellite missiles which could take out our command and control infrastructure:
http://www.google.com/search?safe=off&q=loral+china+missile
Bernard L. Schartz needs to be hung for treason.
KEYWORDS: Bernard L. Schartz Norman Hsu Loral Missile ICBM anti-satellite ASAT ASM New School Board of Trustees Bernard L. Schartz Norman Hsu Loral Missile ICBM anti-satellite ASAT ASM New School Board of Trustees Bernard L. Schartz Norman Hsu Loral Missile ICBM anti-satellite ASAT ASM New School Board of Trustees Bernard L. Schartz Norman Hsu Loral Missile ICBM anti-satellite ASAT ASM New School Board of Trustees Bernard L. Schartz Norman Hsu Loral Missile ICBM anti-satellite ASAT ASM New School Board of Trustees Bernard L. Schartz Norman Hsu Loral Missile ICBM anti-satellite ASAT ASM New School Board of Trustees Bernard L. Schartz Norman Hsu Loral Missile ICBM anti-satellite ASAT ASM New School Board of Trustees Bernard L. Schartz Norman Hsu Loral Missile ICBM anti-satellite ASAT ASM New School Board of Trustees Bernard L. Schartz Norman Hsu Loral Missile ICBM anti-satellite ASAT ASM New School Board of Trustees Bernard L. Schartz Norman Hsu Loral Missile ICBM anti-satellite ASAT ASM New School Board of Trustees.
**************************************************
PS: WorldNetDaily has [finally!] picked up on the story:
Is the other Hsu about to drop?
Hillary's donor linked to China missile trader
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/printer-friendly.asp?ARTICLE_ID=57450
The minute I heard this story I knew that he would either disappear or have an "accident". You just don't live to testify against the Clinton Crime Cartel. If Hillary thought this guy was going to sing, how could she allow it? Wasn't Vince Foster about to be subpoenaed when he shot himself in the head?
ReplyDelete++
ReplyDeletesomehow i highly doubt China would either embarrass the Clinton's or be embarrassed by the Clinton's (Chinese condoms named after Bill & Monica)..
Clinton's Super Computer Push
http://www.wisconsinproject.org/pubs/editorials/2000/supers-awsj.htm
http://tinyurl.com/385kdl
Asian Wall Street Journal
September 19, 2000, p. 6
A Look At. . . Exporting Trouble
http://www.wisconsinproject.org/pubs/articles/2000/export-troub.html
http://tinyurl.com/2yccay
The Washington Post
Outlook
March 12, 2000, p. B3
CLINTON'S CHINA CONNECTION CONTROVERSY EXPANDS
http://www.fas.org/news/china/1998/980521-prc2.htm
http://tinyurl.com/2qzlgr
May 21, 1998
NEW ALLEGATIONS ABOUT A CLINTON "CHINA CONNECTION"
http://www.fas.org/news/china/1998/980518-prc2.htm
http://tinyurl.com/33gttu
May 18, 1998
WISCONSIN PROJECT ON NUCLEAR ARMS CONTROL
http://www.fas.org/spp/starwars/congress/1997_h/s970410m.htm
http://tinyurl.com/2xkoss
APRIL 10, 1997
ps: also wouldn't doubt the Clinton's have some sort of connection to Google et al, not to mention the Hienz-Kerry clan..
==
Of course, the next chapter in this story has Hsu floating face-down in the Gowanus Canal.
ReplyDeleteThe autopsy will show death by natural causes....
He is just hiding until the Clintons can put the fix in for him and their other shady donors. Personally I wouldn't be a bit surprised if this guy turns up dead-as an apparent "suicide".
ReplyDeleteThey apparently have killed off release of "The Path to 9/11." Not surprising considering how many former Clinton White House officials and other Democrats are employed by ABC.
These are dangerous times, friends. The Clinton campaign is reeking to high heaven and it is beginning to look like the 2008 election is being rigged. They are making the caucus/primary system for the Democratic party into a rubber stamp for them thus disenfranchising the party rank and file. Now things like the above. We ain't seen nothing yet.
++
ReplyDeleteChina Connection
==
Perhaps his lawyers spoke to him through Tara Knight or James Van Praagh. His new legal representative is Vincent Foster.
ReplyDelete++
ReplyDeleteNahanni @ 2:01 PM
excerpt:
[Nowrasteh, also one of the miniseries' many producers, said he was told by a top executive at ABC Studios that "if Hillary weren't running for president, this wouldn't be a problem."]
and of course all of this (China; 9/11; etc) has garnered endless front page headlines via the MSM, as well as the scandal de jour via tragedy tv's hosts & talking heads for at least a week now, right?? gah!!
OT.. did you hear what Schumer said about the troops?? damn, where's my AK47!!
==
++
ReplyDeletere: Schumer (seriously if you have high
blood pressure (i do) read with caution)
==
bg,
ReplyDeleteWhat I find disturbing is that the Democrats seem to not give a damn what they do or say. They have the polling numbers and should know that the shite they are spewing and doing is very unpopular in all except the bluest of blue areas. Now, one would think that if they want to win a very important election like the 2008 one they would behave differently. That is unless they are reasonably sure that it won't make a tinkers damn how the election goes because they have it rigged. Which to me it is beginning to appear so. Like I said above-we ain't seen nothing yet.
++
ReplyDeletei know Nahanni..
the Dem leadership is truly deplorable.. :(
i don't know what to say except for when is enough going to be enough before Americans start fighting back?? heck, it only took the Iraqis 4 years of indescribable hell before they wised up, and they lived under a maniacal dictatorship for approx 3 decades before that.. whereas we have more or less lived utopian lives by comparison.. hence, i must ask, how stupid are we.. or better yet, are we as stupid as they think we are?? *sigh*
==
They are all corrupt dave, some more than others. and as a democrat these are a few reasons why Im concerned.
ReplyDeleteIm very worried about Hillary becoming the nominee. One of the biggest reasons being, the republicans. They are salvating at the thought of going up against her. They have been gearing up for this, for years. And I know so many Hillary supporters are saying shes been there before, she knows how to fight them and win. But to me thats the the whole piont. Yes, maybe she will win. But why on earth would we as democrats nominate someone that has to fight off years of controversy and questionable practices that she and her husband have been involved in. And if she were to win, how many more enemys will she have created in the process. And in the end will that give us the kind of bipartisan Leadership that this country desperately needs right now. I know any democrat that we nominate is going to be given a hard time by the republicans. But Im absolutely convinced that Obama has much firmer ground to stand on.
In point, This is the message voters need to be getting.