Sacrebleu!... French Socialists Back Barack Obama
Mondesfrancophones sends this election news:
The kiss of death: Barack being endorsed by French socialists:
Le baiser au pendu - the Kiss of Death
There's more at Pour-Obama
(Warning- the website Pour-Obama may lock up things when you open it.)
Here's the rough translation:
"When you encounter Barack Obama, you believe him outright.Thanks to A. Leupin
Large and handsome man with the approach smiling, it is one of those rare tributes who, beyond their message, dreams. It is that kind of leader that makes you believe in the policy and makes you want to go further with him "
And again:
"The Committee french support Barack Obama hopes your support. We do not vote but we have the power to influence and powerful. Obama is important for the United States and also for France. For him, convinced internationalist, a public support French would be valuable. Get involved on his victory! "
The kick ass, I tell you!
posted by Gateway Pundit at 3/23/2008 02:00:00 PM
36 Comments:
off topic, but thanks for the compliment, gp!
i don't like unfair tactics when the right uses them, and i dont' like unfiar tactics when the left uses them!
'preciate your stopping by.
The French you say?
Get.out!
"French Socialists"
Isn't that excessively redundant?
Gee, I hope the obamster likes cheese with his appeasement.
One of the comments on extremecentre.org says: French opinion is an excellent inverse predictor of the US presidential election. In 2000, they were for Gore. In 2004 for Kerry. And now for Obamama.
"When you encounter Barack Obama, you believe him outright."...
Gosh! Isn't this taking stupidity to a new low even for socialist libtards from France?
French isolate stupid gene
Discovery will lead to golden age of genetically-improved French teenagers
by Lester Haines
French boffins claim to have isolated the "stupid" gene in what is being heralded as as major breakthrough in genetic engineering.
The tiny slither of DNA, which has been found in 94 per cent of French teenagers, is claimed to control stupid, tiresome and petulant behaviour.
The team behind the discovery have spent five years and FF90 million locating the gene from among four million suspected mutations.(there is more)
Almost as bad as McCain actively seeking and winning the endorsement of anti-Catholic, anti-American bigots!
"Almost as bad as McCain actively seeking and winning the endorsement of anti-Catholic, anti-American bigots!"...
McCain was, "activly seeking" the endorsement?!?!
What do you have that's credible that says McCain was making an effort to seek this supposed endorsement?
Who are these alledged, "anti-American bigots" you are refering to?
Are you saying that McCain was seeking Rev. Wright's endorsement?
Tell us more, curious minds want to know...
++
Obama - Building a Religion
they need to change that title to "Obama -
Building an International Religion".. :D
==
Well maybe the French socialist enjoy being lied to...
Considering Obama's libtard grip on reality maybe this is what appeals to the French...
Senator Barack Obama calls himself a progressive and a pragmatist and says that a lot of the "old labels don't apply any more."...
Oh, Juandos, how stupid you are. Link provided below:
http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003728364
John Hagee, known anti-American bigot (see comments re: God punishing American), admits McCain actively sought his endorsement.
If Wright is anti-American for saying God damn America for America's actions, then Hagee is anti-American for saying God punishes America for its actions.
So much for McCain's patriotism. Imagine an ex-POW actively seeking the endorsement of a known anti-American preacher!
McCain ought to be ashamed of himself for such anti-American support.
Can you wrap your warped little mind around that?
++
an endorsement is NOT the same as a RELATIONSHIP.. Daniel Ortega (amongst other radical / anti-Americans) endorsed Obama.. did Obama reject any of them.. hello??
McCain / Parsley
[According to the campaign, McCain met Parsley for the first time three weeks ago, when the pastor served as an introductory speaker at a February 26 rally in Cincinnati.
McCain praised most of the leaders in attendance [including Parsley], saying of Parsley: “I am very honored today to have one of the truly great leaders in America, a moral compass, a spiritual guide…(i inserted [including Parsley] simply because it should state including Parsley, but then it couldn't be twisted by the MSM if they wrote it in context could it..]
[allegations that controversial Ohio pastor, Rev. Rod Parsley, serves as a “spiritual guide”]
what allegations?? McCain is correct.. Parsley is considered a "spiritual quide" by his flock (of which McCain is not a member of)..
bottom line:
Parsley is NOT McCain's "spiritual guide".. he had just met the man for the first time the night he graciously thanked the speakers (Parsley being one).. unless Parsley stated any of those things that night in McCain's presence, there is no way in hades they have any reflection on McCain..
now if McCain had known Parsley for over 20 years, etc.. and considered him a member of his family per se, or he said those things the first time he met him.. that would be a totally different kettle of fish, but it's not reality..
HT : Astute Bloggers
McCain / Hagee
excerpts:
[These points are extremely important and mark a completely different relationship between the hatemonger Wright and Barack Obama and McCain and Hagee. It shows that Obama had many decades of intimacy with Rev. Wright proving that Wright's hate speech could not possibly have bothered Barack very much at all, much less have come as any surprise. While John McCain had only just met John Hagee proving that his history of anti-Catholic statements is not something that McCain could have had long and intimate contact with.]
[But there is absolutely no way to equate McCain's acceptance of the anti-Catholic Hagee's support with that of Obama's acceptance of the racist Wright's. Obama has no excuse to have only suddenly distanced himself form this hate filled, ranter whom he has called his "spiritual mentor." For decades Obama has known of, and sat in a congregation listening to, the wild-eyed rants by this man. Barack has accepted him as part of his family closely associated with his wife and children. Barack Hussein Obama has been very close with Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright, Jr. for 20 some years. On the other hand, John McCain has only just met John Hagee. You just cannot equate the two.]
oh btw .. i can link to Muslims who have said much worse things than the Rev. Parsley.. at least there's an assemblance of truth to his words that can be backed up by Muslims themselves vs Rev. Wrights echoes of a man consumed by hatred of America, whites & evidently i dare say God himself noting his profound "God complex"..
McCain rejects anti-Catholic views
pertinent excerpts:
[Republican presidential candidate John McCain on Friday repudiated any views of a prominent televangelist who endorsed him last month "if they are anti-Catholic or offensive to Catholics."]
[On Friday, McCain took a stronger stance on Hagee's views in an interview with The Associated Press.
"We've had a dignified campaign, and I repudiate any comments that are made, including Pastor Hagee's, if they are anti-Catholic or offensive to Catholics," McCain said.
"I sent two of my children to Catholic school. I categorically reject and repudiate any statement that was made that was anti-Catholic, both in intent and nature. I categorically reject it, and I repudiate it," McCain said.
"And we can't have that in this campaign," McCain said. "We're trying to unite the country. We're uniting the country, not dividing it."]
the end..
==
@bg
Did I give you this link yet? I think I did, but just in case I didn't... Also, it bears repeating anyway for those who haven't got it yet.
++
re: bg @ 7:57 PM..
McCain rejects anti-Catholic views
sorry about that, hope the link works now.. but just in case it doesn't, you can copy & paste it..
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5iE2JCSH5p9r2GBkQWS9TWAMzmuvQD8V8QK2O1
==
++
ytba @ 8:09 PM..
just found it earlier today..
posted it somewhere in here??
thanks.. :)
==
Really, John McCain only met Hagee 3 weeks ago? Are you sure about that?
B/c an email sent from Hagee to Christians United For Israel says otherwise:
http://www.talk2action.org/story/2007/2/23/9556/02805/
Notice the date of the story: February 2007... geez, that's a little more than 3 weeks ago. How about a year ago?
Effing liars! Every last one of you!
How un-American that you accept a Presidential candidate who is supposedly the most patriotic (whatever the hell that means!), who has LIED about meeting with an anti-American preacher and has actively sought the endorsement of the anti-American preacher!
How truly un-American of you!
Make all the excuses you want: John McCain is a liar! If he truly loves America, like he claims, there is no way in hell he would have actively sought the endorsement of Hagee and Parsley.
He can attempt to unring the bell but it has rung, and far too loudly. He is a liar who keeps company with men who hate America.
I would venture to say, as well, that McCain seeking the endorsement of Hagee and Parsley is far worse than Obama's relationship with his pastor.
See, Obama went to his pastor for spiritual guidance, Bible stuff, etc.
McCain went to Hagee and Parsley for political guidance and support.
McCain is far more dangerous in his pursuit b/c these two fanatics are truly crazy. The image of them, with their insane hate of America, standing by McCain is terrifying. McCain speaks of Armageddon just like those two wack jobs.
McCain is part and parcel of Hagee and Parsley. He went on Meet the Press in 2006 (see link in last post) and talked about this being Armageddon.
Truly terrifying! Do we really want an anti-American religious fanatic like John McCain, being advised by Hagee and Parsley, sitting by when the phone rings?
I certainly hope not!
++
Anonymous @ 8:34 PM..
i believe you're confusing Hagee with Parsley..
==
++
everyone seems to be confusing Hagee
with Parsley here and/or there.. duh!!
==
"http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003728364"...
Sorry anon @ 7:31 pm, I never thought to look at a libtard production for facts...
I asked for something credible you an obvious moron give me E&P and the New York Times...
BTW (rhetorical question here) does McCain have a 20+ year track record with Hagee?
You are a fool!
I can easily imagine the people who spawned you cringing everytime you make some sort of statement...
Memo to the LLL trolls:
I guess you did not get your revised copy of your talking points. the one you are using is outdated. The central committee realizes that the previous set do not work and only serves to make you and them look like complete blithering idiots. Which, of course, you are.
For our entertainment please keep using them. Your use of them is the equivalent of putting your head on a T-Ball stand for our Cluebat(TM) batting practice.
Oh, Nahanni, I absolutely adore how you make statements without any backup. But that happens when you are pulling crap out of your ass and calling it a valid idea.
I'm sorry, Juandos, am I supposed to call up John Hagee himself and ask him what he told the NYT?
Since I did not read that he disputed the NYT story, it is true.
Or am I supposed to get all my news from Faux News or the liars on here who twist information?
So other than pointing out that the story IN WHICH HAGEE WAS INTERVIEWED AND WHICH HE DOES NOT DISPUTE came from NYT, do you have anything of value to say?
My guess is not.
BG: I understand you probably did not finish grade school so I will explain this in idiot terms.
H-a-g-e-e spells Hagee. The article about the meeting with Christians United for Israel was with someone name H-a-g-e-e.
The talk2action link that has the information does not mention Parsley, which is spelled
P-a-r-s-l-e-y.
I know that reading can be difficult. Maybe a purchase of Hooked-on-Phonics would help you. Sometimes, elementary school teachers do tutoring on the side. Either of those would help.
Learn to read, please.
++
Anon..
read this (in context if you can)..
even if Hagee or Parsley (et al) literally stated "God is damning America"..
it does not literally equate to Wright's (et al) emphatic repetition of God Damn America!!
hope you get it, because i have to run.. i'm already late for my 3rd grade lit lesson & don't have the time to explain what intent means..
==
Gosh! Incredibly idiotic nonsense here: "am I supposed to call up John Hagee himself and ask him what he told the NYT?"...
Well you brought it up, I didn't...
While you are at it, ask Hagee if McCain as been sitting in the pews for twenty years...
"Or am I supposed to get all my news from Faux News or the liars on here who twist information?"...
Oh dear! Another libtard has had his/her/its bubble cushioning him/her/it from reality has been punctured by Fox News Channel...LOL!
"liars on here"...
Talk about unsubstantiated statements... I can see why you are a Hussein the socialist supporter...
"So other than pointing out that the story IN WHICH HAGEE WAS INTERVIEWED AND WHICH HE DOES NOT DISPUTE came from NYT"...
Again another unsubstantiated comment...
Keep trying fool...ROFLMAO!
Is Obama Just A Failure With A Good Rap?
BG: now you're just nitpicking. First, it was the 20 years thing. Then it was the meaning of "damn" v. "punish." Now it's intent.
My, my, my, you sound like Bill Clinton talking about sex.
So Hagee hates homosexuals and homosexuality. His saying that God is damning America is okay with you?
Would it have been no problem had Wright said that God is damning America for killing innocent people and acting like God?
See, your argument holds no water b/c there is no argument there. You can't even make up your mind about how to justify the anti-American hateful rants of the white preachers.
You are merely trying to excuse the unexcusable.
Do you think the many children and parents who died in Hurricane Katrina really care about Hagee's "intent" when he said their deaths were God's damnation for a gay pride parade?
McCain should be ashamed of himself for actively seeking and accepting the endorsement of such an anti-American bigot.
What a show of poor judgment on McCain's part!
Juandos: do you have the ability to follow a single thread or is that too taxing for you?
I told you about the NYT magazine article in which Hagee said McCain sought his endorsement. A statement, mind you, that Hagee has not refuted.
If you can find somewhere where Hagee said the NYT misquoted him, do let me know.
Anyway, you were trying to discredit the NYT interview so I merely asked how I should go about proving what Hagee really said.
NYT quoted Hagee, Hagee did not dispute it anywhere, and yet you live in your moronic bubble and refuse to accept it.
The funniest part is that you have the gall to call me the fool....hahahaha!
Poor Juandos. I truly pity you. I'm being serious here. I really pity you.
++
Earth to Anonymous @ 5:07 PM..
saying "God is damning America" is an opinionated reflection (after the fact)..
saying "God Damn America!!" is a projected pronouncement of HATRED (summoning evil upon)..
and since i'm sure you're not about to stop with your nonsensical, incoherent ramblings.. i shall consider you a troll from this point on..
==
++
ps: re: [Would it have been no problem had Wright said that God is damning America for killing innocent people and acting like God?]
Wright doesn't know his arse from
his elbow, and neither do you..
Muslim Black slavery - Islam slave history of Black Africa
SLAVERY IN ISLAM
excerpt:
[The West is familiar with the history of slavery in the new world. It was sinful and terrible, and it lasted for several hundred years. And it was abolished mainly through the efforts of Christians in England (Wilberforce, Clarkson) and America (the Abolitionists, primarily Protestant).
However, few people in the west know about Islam and slavery. Most would be surprised that Islam authorizes the taking of slaves as spoils of war. From the days that Muhammad drew his sword to rob and conquer non-Muslims to this very day, Muslims have been taking non-Muslims, and even other black Muslims, as slaves.
Muslims were enslaving black Africans long before any slave ships sailed for the New World. Muslims were taking and making slaves all over the lands they had conquered. Later, when slave ships were loaded with black slaves, often, a Muslim slave broker had the human cargo all ready to go. American slavers rarely had to go into inland to capture slaves, they were already waiting there, courtesy of some Muslim ruler, and/or slave broker! In many cases, if the black slaves were not sent to the New World, they were sent to the Mideast to be enslaved by Arabs, or kept by other black Muslims as slaves.]
WHEN EUROPEANS WERE SLAVES
excerpt:
[The result is that between 1530 and 1780 there were almost certainly 1 million and quite possibly as many as 1.25 million white, European Christians enslaved by the Muslims of the Barbary Coast.
Davis said his research into the treatment of these slaves suggests that, for most of them, their lives were every bit as difficult as that of slaves in America.
"As far as daily living conditions, the Mediterranean slaves certainly didn't have it better," he said.
While African slaves did grueling labor on sugar and cotton plantations in the Americas, European Christian slaves were often worked just as hard and as lethally – in quarries, in heavy construction, and above all rowing the corsair galleys themselves.
Davis said his findings suggest that this invisible slavery of European Christians deserves more attention from scholars.
"We have lost the sense of how large enslavement could loom for those who lived around the Mediterranean and the threat they were under," he said. "Slaves were still slaves, whether they are black or white, and whether they suffered in America or North Africa."]
Fear of the Horizon.. Barbary brutality.
excerpt:
[The Mediterranean slavery of the 16th and 17th centuries fell somewhere between those two. It was not race slavery, but nor was it indiscriminate. It was religious slavery. The human beings kidnapped and sold by the Barbary pirates were fair game because they were Christian. A Christian slave on the Barbary Coast could attain his freedom by converting to Islam, and many did so.]
The Racist History of the Democratic Party (2/04)
excerpts:
[Some called it the Civil War, others called it the War Between the States, but to the African Americans at that time, it was the War Between the Democrats and the Republicans over slavery. The Democrats gave their lives to expand it, Republican gave their lives to ban it.]
[Congressional records show it was Democrats that strongly opposed the passage of the 13th, 14th and 15th Amendments. These three Amendments were introduced by Republicans to abolish slavery, give citizenship to all African Americans born in the United States and, give Blacks the right to vote.]
[History reveals that it was three white persons that opposed the Democrat's racist practices who started the NAACP.]
[Today both parties must remember their past. The Democrats must remember the terrible things they did to Blacks and apologize and the Republicans must remember the terrific things they did for Blacks and re-commit to complete the work that their predecessors started and died for.]
Wayne Perryman
DIXIE'S CENSORED SUBJECT.. BLACK SLAVEOWNERS
excerpt:
[According to federal census reports, on June 1, 1860 there were nearly 4.5 million Negroes in the United States, with fewer than four million of them living in the southern slaveholding states. Of the blacks residing in the South, 261,988 were not slaves. Of this number, 10,689 lived in New Orleans. The country's leading African American historian, Duke University professor John Hope Franklin, records that in New Orleans over 3,000 free Negroes owned slaves, or 28 percent of the free Negroes in that city.
To return to the census figures quoted above, this 28 percent is certainly impressive when compared to less than 1.4 percent of all American whites and less than 4.8 percent of southern whites. The statistics show that, when free, blacks disproportionately became slave masters.]
"one can lead the clueless to education, but one cannot make them think"..
==
++
alternate quote re: bg @ 5:38 PM..
"one can lead the ignorant to knowledge, but one cannot make them think"..
now that's saying the "samo samo"..
==
++
flashback/forward:
Islam in France: The French Way of Life Is in Danger
Why the EU Needs to be Destroyed, and Soon
Fjordman: Why the European Union Must Go
Fjordman: The European Union and the Islamization of Europe
Fascism's Legacy: Liberalism
Fascism and liberalism
Islamization of France and beyond
there's more, but i'm sure you get the idea..
==
"Juandos: do you have the ability to follow a single thread or is that too taxing for you?"...
Coming from you that's rich! Funny too!
"I told you about the NYT magazine article in which Hagee said McCain sought his endorsement. A statement, mind you, that Hagee has not refuted."...
Still the fool thinking that quoting the New York Times is somehow credible... How do you know Hagee hasn't refuted what were supposedly his words in the New York Times?
Considering the New York Times track record since at least WWII (can you say Walter Duranty) anything and everything in the New York Times is at best questionable...
Is the following your moronic attempt to save face: "Poor Juandos. I truly pity you. I'm being serious here. I really pity you"?
You proved yourself a fool and a liar as soon as YOU quoted the New York Times and Editor & Publisher...
Begone you parsitic troll... You've been hammered again...
"How do you know Hagee hasn't refuted what were supposedly his words in the New York Times?"
Um, you're the one who said the article isn't credible (not because of what the article said but b/c it was published in the NYT).
Since you're the one casting aspersions, it is up to you to prove the article stated something less than fact.
You don't prove a negative.
Just another "Juandos" idiot moment. Typical.
Me: Put forth statements from interview.
Juandos: That's a lie. It's from the NYT.
Me: Can you prove it?
Juandos: Well, how do you know he didn't refute it?
Me: Um, because I can't find a refutation anywhere.
Juandos: Just b/c you can't find a refutation doesn't mean it doesn't exists. Remember, anon, we're conservatives. Facts don't matter to us.
Me: Show me the refutation since you claimed the article isn't credible.
Juandos: Troll! Troll!
So ends the debate. Gotta love conservatives... they make me laugh (and feel sad at the same time).
++
Anon..
["do you have the ability to follow a single
thread or is that too taxing for you?"...]
TITLE OF THREAD:
"Sacrebleu!... French Socialists Back Barack Obama"
goes w/o saying folks..
==
There are also many french politicians from the right in this committee...so before telling wrong stories, try to be well informed !
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home