Tuesday, May 13, 2008

AP Hides Good Economic Numbers In Military News

Where do you go to get your economic news?

The Bush unemployment numbers continue to best the numbers from the Clinton years.
But, you would have to search the military news to find out how the low unemployment rate is affecting society.

The Pentagon opposes Senator Jim Webb's (D-VA) legislation that would guarantee a full-ride scholarship for service members to any in-state public university after only 3 years of service. The Pentagon said it would hurt its ability to retain service members.
This seemed like an odd place for the Associated Press to hide the good economic numbers:

The Pentagon's opposition to Webb's bill underscores the difficulty the military has had in recruiting and retaining an all-volunteer force at a time when it is engaged in a war that is deeply unpopular with the American public.

Adding to the military's dilemma is the larger number of soldiers and Marines needed to fight the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Last year, the Pentagon recommended that the Army be increased by about 65,000 soldiers to a total of 547,000, and the Marines be increased by 27,000 to 202,000.

(The Associated Press omits the fact here that the Pentagon released figures this week showing that both recruitment and retention continue to meet or exceed goals for the year.)

The difficulty in finding young people also can be attributed in part to low unemployment numbers in recent years. According to the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service, unemployment dropped from 6 percent in 2003 to 4.6 percent in 2007.

In recent months, the military has had to take creative steps to reach its desired troop numbers. A year ago, when Army recruiters didn't meet their goal, the service announced new $20,000 bonuses for recruits and up to $40,000 if an enlistee signed up for at least four years.
Related... The media failed to mention the record US April Tax receipts.

18 comments:

  1. Anonymous5:58 AM

    That is one extremely dishonest graphic. It makes it look like the Bush years have half the reported unemployment of the Clinton years. How does it do so? Because the scale is so narrow. There's no reason for such a tiny range EXCEPT to distort the message of the actual numbers. The actual numbers are just about equal. The reported numbers are SLIGHTLY less during the Bush years.

    ReplyDelete
  2. bvw- Write Microsoft. It is their default chart created in Excel.

    Oh, and the numbers are not dishonest. It is the biased media that is slanting the truth.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous6:43 AM

    Aye, so I'll repeat: That is one extremely dishonest GRAPHIC.

    I make no claim about the numbers, as any aggregate number describing a society of 300 million, it is someone's honest enough confection, representing all sorts of honest presumptions and honest attempts to sample for underlying numbers that represent a whole.

    And to bring up MS-Excel -- well, you can change the scale by yourself even in the chartingly challenged modern Excel.

    ReplyDelete
  4. LOL!

    bvw can not dispute the numbers so he/she/it gets it's knickers in a twist over the chart. I guess I never really look at charts, I tend to read the articles and posts.

    Anyhoo, bvw honey, apparently it does not bother you in the least that the MSM and your Democratic party buddies have been flat out lying to the American public.

    Oh, wait, I forgot....

    That is what passes for the truth in "reality-based community". A community located on the scenic banks of the river Denial where it is always sunny with widely scattered rainbows and 1968. A place the Polar Bear lies down with the Ring Seal and where the whole world will hold hands and sing "Kumbayah" once the evil AmeriKKKa is destroyed.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous2:02 AM

    This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous7:13 PM

    This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anonymous9:05 AM

    This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous7:08 AM

    This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anonymous4:40 PM

    This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Anonymous2:01 AM

    This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Anonymous2:01 AM

    This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Anonymous1:58 AM

    This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Anonymous3:05 PM

    This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Anonymous2:00 AM

    This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Anonymous2:50 PM

    This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Anonymous4:26 AM

    This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Anonymous4:36 AM

    This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Anonymous7:06 PM

    This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete