Saturday, May 31, 2008

It's Official: May Saw Lowest Number Of US Fatalities In Iraq

May was the least deadly month for US troops since the start of the war.

Click to Enlarge
Numbers via ICasualties

May was the least deadly month for US troops since the beginning of the War 5 years ago.
The Iraqi news organization Aswat Aliraq reported:

The CIA has declared that al-Qaeda is virtually defeated in Iraq and that the country is seeing its lowest level of violence for four years, according to the British newspaper The Times.

Nineteen US military personnel have died in Iraq this month, according to the Pentagon, making May the least deadly month for US troops since the beginning of the war, writes journalist Tim Reid in an article.

The deadliest month for US troops was May 2007, when 126 died as the insurgency in Baghdad raged.

The main reason for the drop in violence, which has also seen a big decline in Iraqi civilian deaths, is a ceasefire by the Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr, whose forces have been directly confronted by US and Iraqi troops for over a month.

Rear Admiral Patrick Driscoll, a US spokesman, said violent incidents in Iraq were down 70 per cent since President Bush ordered a “surge” of 35,000 extra troops into the country last year. In April, 75 Iraqi civilians, soldiers and police were killed, the lowest level since November 2004.

The relative calm produced by the Shiite ceasefire has coincided with what the CIA is now calling the “near strategic defeat” of al-Qaeda in Iraq, and a growing rejection of the group's murderous ideology across the Middle East.

Michael Hayden, the CIA director, speaking to the Washington Post, said the terrorist group was essentially defeated in Iraq and Saudi Arabia, and had suffered “significant setbacks globally as a lot of the Islamic world pushes back on their form of Islam”.

In a May 22, 2008, file photo Iraqis shop at a market in central Baghdad, Iraq. The U.S. military says violence across Iraq has reached its lowest level in more than four years, after successes this year in breaking al-Qaida and other Sunni insurgents' hold in western Iraq and — more recently — government crackdowns in the southern city of Basra and northern city of Mosul. (AP Photo/Hadi Mizban/file)

Also today... France expressed a renewed commitment to Iraq as French Foreign Minister flew into Baghdad for a surprise visit.

This news is truly discomforting for Barack Obama and the Democrats who have expected America to lose this war in Iraq.

8 comments:

  1. This is wonderful news; of course Obama, Pelosi, and Reed will find this to "another revoltin' development. Didn't anyone pay attention when they declared that the war was over-AND THAT WE LOST!!!!

    I'll bet more Americans suffered violent deaths during May in Chicago, L.A. , and Philly than in the war. But, why isn't the lefties worried about that? Perhaps it's part of the "cultural heritage" in the folks killin' and being killed in these cities......

    I guess I don't understand the nuance............

    I hear that Wright, Phleger, and Farakhan know whose reponsible-Whitey and the Jooooooooooossss!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous11:24 AM

    Actually one of those guys did die in Chicago. He was home on leave from Iraq and was killed by a hit and run driver in Chicago. This site at global security gives you a month by month run down of casualties together with names and cause of death. It is amazing how many of the deaths are not combat related.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous11:34 AM

    Let's say the count rises to 28 next month, which will still be a horrible loss, but (I think) the second lowest monthly total. The headlines will read "American casulties in Iraq jump 47% since last month."

    ReplyDelete
  4. The troop surge seems to have worked! The Dems won't let reality get in the way of their script. We lost no matter what the facts tell us! Padre Steve

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous3:15 PM

    Based on the linked story about the French visit, here's my proposed "Question of the Day" that McCain can ask Obama:

    "Senator Obama, if things are supposedly so bad in Iraq why is France--let me repeat that--FRANCE opening up two new consular posts in Arbil and, especially, Basra?"

    Obama has now waltzed himself into a trap:

    1. If he doesn't go to Iraq, then McCain will relentlessly pound him day after day: "Whatsa matter, buddy? You CHICKEN? BAWK, BAWK, BAWK!!!"

    2. If he does go to Iraq, then he'll be in the glare of TV lights as our troops, their commanders, and Iraqis ask him uncomfortable questions and confront him with undeniable truths...and show him to be the empty-suited, reality-denying, history-challenged, loony-leftoid dumb s*** we always knew he was.

    Somewhere, deep within her underground lair, Hillary must be cackling extra loudly right now.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I know that Gateway Pundit likes to put things into perspective...so...

    44 people were murdered in Los Angeles for the month of May http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/homicidereport/
    as of May 30.

    I am just a simple Canadian living in Montreal, but this makes me wonder if L.A. is more dangerous for an American than Iraq?

    ReplyDelete
  7. One of those men, Sgt. John K. Daggett, died in Halifax, Canada. What's with that? It says he was injured May 1st and died May 15th. Was he en route to a hospital in the US, or something?

    ReplyDelete
  8. ++

    OT (well, sort of)..

    When—if ever—will Sen. Obama convene the Subcommittee on Europe?

    excerpts:

    ["Someone who is seeking the presidency should have some facility for the most important anchor in global affairs, which is the transatlantic relationship," he said. "The major threats in the 21st century are changing but what is not changing is the vital necessity of Europe and the US collaborating in meeting those challenges with Europe, for instance, in the lead on dealing with Iran. This is a very disconcerting void in Obama's profile."]

    [“I also have heard Senator Obama refer continually to Afghanistan, and he references being on the Foreign Relations Committee,” Clinton said. “He chairs the Subcommittee on Europe. It has jurisdiction over NATO. NATO is critical to our mission in Afghanistan. He’s held not one substantive hearing to do oversight, to figure out what we can do to actually have a stronger presence with NATO in Afghanistan."

    Obama responded: “Well, first of all, I became chairman of this committee at the beginning of this campaign, at the beginning of 2007. So it is true that we haven’t had oversight hearings on Afghanistan.”]

    Obama the non-excuse-excuse master..

    RTWT..

    ==

    ReplyDelete