Friday, June 27, 2008

Bang! Bang!... Bambi Gunned Down on YouTube

Which is it senator?
Are you for the DC gun ban?... Or, are you against the DC gun ban?
...For or against?
Video via HotAir:

He was for the DC gun ban (only 4 months ago) before he was against it.

Do you suppose the most liberal senator is trying to disguise his radical past of opposing the manufacture, sale and possession of hand guns to appear more moderate?
He wouldn't do that would he?

Here is a copy of a questionaire signed by Barack Obama that was submitted to an Illinois voter's group where he recorded his antigun agenda, via The Politico:

Click to Enlarge
From the answers on the questionaire it is clear that the most liberal senator is not the moderate he wants to portray to the American public.
...By a long shot.

More... And, Obama voted 4 times to allow criminal charges against homeowners who defended their homes and property with a gun.
He's definitely not the person he wants you to believe he is.

15 Comments:

Blogger Reliapundit said...

one of the really great things about euope is that socialists run as socialists.

i mean... that's what they call their freakin party. they're honest about it.

here in the usa, the dems try to hide it.

most, at least.

like obama.

lefies like wellstone didn't, and kucinich doesn't.

but obama and his red-diaper-doper guru axelrod know that if the electorate really knew how left obama really was he wouldn't stand a chance.

i think it might be a side effect of the two-party system and our three branches with a bicameral legislature:

the parties need to be moderate to win.

i europe - with their multi-party proportional systems, there's no reason to moderate; hence their socialists call themselves what they are.

actually, europe wo0uld be better off if they chucked their system and adopted ours.

and if the whole world got rid of and got beyond socialism.

8:27 PM  
Anonymous NeoKong said...

Can't he just eat his waffles in peace?(I stole that)
In the second clip you will notice how Obama said "illegal handguns" when the ban clearly applies to all handguns.

The thing about Obama is that he is not a very good liar.
No one actually believes that he is for the rights of gun owners.
I bet it won't be long before we see Obama wearing a checkered flannel jacket holding a shotgun and a dead duck talking about his love for hunting.

8:28 PM  
Blogger Mike's America said...

All of these flip flops amount to a staggering attempt to hornswoggle the American people into thinking Obama is something that he is not.

Unfortunately, Obama will throw so much chaff into the political winds these next 129 days that it will be next to impossible for the casual observer who votes but isn't addicted to the news to figure out who and what he is.

McCain will be massively outspent and Obama will limit debates to a minimum.

It's going to be a mess!

9:58 PM  
Anonymous Joshua said...

Jim,

Found this video link on John Galts site you linked earlier. Thought you might want to review Jackie Mason's take down of Obama.

It is the politically incorrect calling out of Obama as a fake. He is either dumb, deaf, stupid or a liar and does not deserve to be President. Link:

Calling a Schmuck a Schmuck

Glad to see someone in enterntainment calling him out.

Now, if he'd take on the Axelrod's and Soro's of the world, King Schmuck Makers and Fugitives, plus Commies like Ayers and Dorhn. I hope he continues an ongoing monologue.

Go Jackie Go!

10:55 PM  
Blogger juandos said...

"here in the usa, the dems try to hide it.

most, at least.

like obama.
"...

The reliapundit nails it again of course...

Did anyone else think it was humerous when Hussein the INANE tried to deny that he was a thorough going libtard back in February of this year?

4:30 AM  
Blogger ptg said...

Obama is such a chameleon. Perhaps by applying the correct pressure we could con him into changing into a Ronald Reagan clone.

"I was a conservative before I was against conservatism."

6:26 AM  
Anonymous quotecritter said...

Obama already distanced himself from the survey.

Well at least his staff says his earlier staff filled it out for him

Aides to Barack Obama last week disavowed a 1996 questionnaire from a liberal Chicago group in which he appeared to take positions well to the left of his current stances on hot-button issues, telling Politico a staff member had filled it out incorrectly.

Now that version is being challenged by the veteran Hyde Park political activists -- and Obama supporters -- who hosted a 1996 meeting between members of the Independent Voters of Illinois Independent Precinct Organization and Obama. One board member of the group, Lois Dobry, called his campaign's explanation "ridiculous," though another former board member, Deborah McCoy, said she had no reason to dispute the campaign's version.

8:14 AM  
Anonymous quotecritter said...

http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/1207/Chicago_activists_doubt_Obamas_answers_on_questionnaire.html

link to prior story

8:15 AM  
Blogger juandos said...

Those fine folks on the editorial staff IBD have this about Obama:

Obama: Riding Tall In The Straddle

9:08 AM  
Anonymous FedUp said...

BO doesn't have the intestinal fortitude to stand on his principles.... oh wait... he doesn't have any!!!

Too bad this empty suit won't debate McCain - that would be an eye-opener for the undecideds.

And, that wussy, kissy-faced farce in Unity... Geez!!!!

9:39 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Is his flip flop as bad as McCain going to "La Raza" to reaffirm his pro-illegal alien amnesty plan after he lies to Conservatives that he has seen the light and won't push it any more.

12:33 PM  
Blogger Nahanni said...

Reliapundit hitrthat one out of the park!

Bravo!

12:54 PM  
Blogger Tully said...

Hey, let's get it right! That's not Bambi, it's Obambi, the Rorschach candidate!

Slogan: "I'm whatever you want me to be, until you elect me!"

2:38 PM  
Anonymous Laurence said...

I would love someone to ask Obama why, given that he ALWAYS thought the DC Gun ban unconstitutional and WHOLEHEARTEDLY agrees with its being overturned, he voted against two of the five justices that made that decision possible? Further, ask him if, had he been in the Senate at the time, he would have voted for or against Justices Thomas and Scalia?

By my count, he voted, or would have voted, that at least four of the five justices he now sides with were unqualified for the SCOTUS.

2:05 AM  
Anonymous John personal trainers new Orleans said...

BHO is a waffler who needs a John "I-was-for-it-before-I was against-it" Kerry moment so he is branded as a flip-flopper that he is.

8:04 PM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home