Tuesday, June 03, 2008

Far Left Democrats: Wrong in 1972- Wrong in 1976- Wrong in 1984- Wrong in 1988- Wrong in 2008

Did Barack Obama get his "surrender lines" from the 1972 George McGovern Campaign?
Astute Bloggers dug up this dove song from 1972:


Did Barack Obama get his "change lines" from the 1976 Carter Campaign?
Via LGF:

Hat Tip Banafsheh Zand-Bonazzi

Did Barack Obama get his "taxcuts for the rich lines" from the 1984 Mondale Campaign?


Did Barack Obama get his "class warfare lines" from 1988 Michael Dukakis Campaign?


The Far Left has not changed a bit in 36 years--
And, their policies are still wrong for America.
The only thing different is this year democrats nominated a Far Left freshman Senator barely three years out of the Illinois legislature whom most of America still hardly knows, except for the church he attends.

9 comments:

  1. ++

    Obama can promise all he wanst, he can even deliver as well.. but what good will it do when America is nuked to hell??

    THIS IS NOT PEACETIME OBAMA..

    OSAMA ET AL DECLARED A HOLY WAR ON US & THE WEST IN 1996..

    but then again, i suspect you would know that better than any of us.. for all we know about you you're probably an undercover Muslim Brotherhood agent.. at least that's how you're relationship resume is shaping up..

    starting with your Mother & Father up to this point in time.. all of you're friends, associates either are or have terrorist or Islamist connections, some both.. not to mention those militant racist aspirations, go figure..

    Islam and Black Liberation Theology

    ==

    ReplyDelete
  2. ++

    re: bg @ 9:04 PM..

    clicked too soon..

    can't forget Marxist/ Communist/ whateverist, they're not looking out for Americans, and neither is Obama..

    ==

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous9:16 PM

    Like father, like son.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous9:39 PM

    As Obama would say:

    "[This] will not be a year of politics as usual. It can be a year of inspiration and hope, and it will be a year of concern, of quiet and sober reassessment of our nation's character and purpose. It has already been a year when voters have confounded the experts.

    "There is a new mood in America. We have been shaken by a tragic war abroad and by scandals and broken promises a home. Our people are searching for new voices and new ideas and new leaders.

    "We have been without leadership too long. We have had divided and deadlocked government too long.

    "It is time for America to move and to speak not with boasting and belligerence but with a quiet strength, to depend in world affairs not merely on the size of on arsenal but on the nobility of ideas.

    "It is time for us to take a new look at our own government, to strip away the secrecy, to expose the unwarranted pressure of lobbyists.

    "It is time for a nationwide comprehensive health program for all our people.

    "We can have an American government that does not oppress or spy on its own people but respects our dignity and our privacy and our right to be let alone."

    Gotcha, these are excerpts from Carter's acceptance speech, July 15, 1976, when he clinched the nomination. they keep singing the same ol' same ol' tune in the best of Leninist fashion... repeat a lie often enough and it becomes true.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Joshua9:56 PM

    Straight from the Communit Party-USA(CPUSA) we've been here before moment. These are the people that support Obama from Communist William Ayers, New Party, Frank Davis, and more.

    They demonize the right. See if you see anything similar to the Marxist, Communist trained rhetoric of Obama...

    "They exploit people as workers on the job and the same people as consumers at the checkout counter."

    Right because Communist pay eveyone the same miserly wage we can all live a miserable life in Moscow with corrupt politico-crats telling us to eat less.

    "Their foremost weapon to maintain their dominance is racism, used to divide working people and achieve extra profits."

    Wow... communist amongst us pointing the old divide and conquer propaganda. Lies and more lies told by the left.

    "They work hard to extend ultra-right control over the government and government policy."

    LOL. The right works hard to free the people from the burden of large government. Least they use to until they started following garbage clap-trap democrats who tax everything and spend just as easily.

    "The ultra-right is led by the most reactionary, militaristic, racist, anti-democratic sectors of the transnationals."

    Again, lies purported as truth twisted like their Komrades from Russia. Communist and Democracy are like oil and water. Communist who dare speak like they know what true democracy is like watching SNL comdians talk seriously about politics. Oh wait, Al Franken is running.

    "They gain support for their ultra-right agenda from other political trends and social groups, most of which are misled as to their real interests, sometimes blinded by the propaganda of fear and scapegoating."

    Yes, murdering 40 million American babies thru the false "social" groups of the left, that could grow up to be creative individuals that hate Communist is a bad thing indeed. Communist indeed want to halt all baby making Americans. Obama agrees.

    "Every movement for change and progress is challenged by the power of the corporations."

    Walmart is installing solar panels. GM is introducing the Volt hyprid electric car for under 30K in 2010. Meanwhile, Communist nations Russia and Red Chavez sell oil for high prices to foreigners while subsidizing to their own citizens. Much of their facilities falling backwards now, especially Venezuela. American corporations have fed the world, created the best technology for us to travel and talk, and are now on the forefront of the all electric car movement and green fuel from genetic high tech research.

    BUFFOONS!!!

    "Workers face corporate power in every contract negotiation. African Americans, Mexican Americans and all other Latinos, Native Americans, Asian Americans, and women all face corporate power when they seek real equality on the job and in their communities."

    Who is racist? Anyone see where they mentioned white people? They listed out minorities. So the Communist propaganda arm of the old Soviet Union seeks to divide us by color, gender and homosexuals too. Yet in Russia, white sumpremicist run rampant beating up minorities. And Putin did little to stop it, nor did his monopolized government media care as minorities were harassed and murdered.

    "Youth face corporate power when they seek free quality education for all."

    What? LOL! Corporate power? Yale, Harvard? All have billions but refuse to give free educations and still ask for more federal money!

    LOL.... Idiots. This is the type of supporters Obama sought out for nomination and who overwhelming support his run for presidency.

    It is clear who they support and why. His Wright-G_d D___ America-kkk pastor that "spiritually" inspires his Marxist messages is found thru the pages of CP USA.
    http://www.cpusa.org/article/archive/147/


    Bring it on indeed fools. One is a Marxist, hateful, angry, racist, dividing message with lies and propaganda from our worst enemies and the other one is from a true hero, a POW, that fought for our country, was correct about Iraq, will win against the terrorist, keep our country safe, will make the nutjob tyrants fear us, and can move this nation forward during a war without appeasement, darkness and defeatist, social cynicism.

    The communist way, the Marxist way has failed now for 60 years. Russia fell apart. China opened its borders to free market. Even France is removing much of its old socialist barriers for more free market enterprise. Our nation during stayed at 5% unemployment while fighting a war on two battlefronts and winning.

    And some namby pamby babies want to complain and whine because they do not get paid $100K to wait tables. Get over it! This is a meritocracy, not a lobotomy nation. We don't check our brains at the door for Nanny State Commies to tell us how and where to work in life. And if everyone gets a free education, who the hell is working? Professors spewing forth Commie rhetoric?

    Sheeshh... lol.. what a bunch of losers.

    ReplyDelete
  6. quotecritter5:51 AM

    Look at who does support Obama and it is the Black/elite-egghead/college groups and that is my friends the New Dukakis Caucus.

    Sure the young kids may make all sorts of volume noise on the web and the social networks but they are full in with their participation in the primaries with little or no chance of growth in numbers for the general.

    Obama took advantage of the way the Dems skewed their delegate distributions in congressional districts overloading them in districts with historical democrat support.

    That put most of the delegates in a state right in the urban areas where Obama's base lives.

    That won't help him in the general at all and the advantage of the skew will melt away.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Sadly I think Obama is more liberal than all of these other guys you posted!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous11:02 AM

    Can you imagine if Obama had been president the last 7 1/2 years? What a disaster it would have been... here's a speech he gave in 2002.

    ****

    http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Barack_Obama's_Iraq_Speech

    Good afternoon. Let me begin by saying that although this has been billed as an anti-war rally, I stand before you as someone who is not opposed to war in all circumstances.

    The Civil War was one of the bloodiest in history, and yet it was only through the crucible of the sword, the sacrifice of multitudes, that we could begin to perfect this union, and drive the scourge of slavery from our soil. I don’t oppose all wars.

    My grandfather signed up for a war the day after Pearl Harbor was bombed, fought in Patton’s army. He saw the dead and dying across the fields of Europe; he heard the stories of fellow troops who first entered Auschwitz and Treblinka. He fought in the name of a larger freedom, part of that arsenal of democracy that triumphed over evil, and he did not fight in vain.

    I don’t oppose all wars.

    After September 11th, after witnessing the carnage and destruction, the dust and the tears, I supported this Administration’s pledge to hunt down and root out those who would slaughter innocents in the name of intolerance, and I would willingly take up arms myself to prevent such a tragedy from happening again.

    I don’t oppose all wars. And I know that in this crowd today, there is no shortage of patriots, or of patriotism. What I am opposed to is a dumb war. What I am opposed to is a rash war. What I am opposed to is the cynical attempt by Richard Perle and Paul Wolfowitz and other arm-chair, weekend warriors in this Administration to shove their own ideological agendas down our throats, irrespective of the costs in lives lost and in hardships borne.

    What I am opposed to is the attempt by political hacks like Karl Rove to distract us from a rise in the uninsured, a rise in the poverty rate, a drop in the median income – to distract us from corporate scandals and a stock market that has just gone through the worst month since the Great Depression.

    That’s what I’m opposed to. A dumb war. A rash war. A war based not on reason but on passion, not on principle but on politics.

    Now let me be clear – I suffer no illusions about Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal man. A ruthless man. A man who butchers his own people to secure his own power. He has repeatedly defied UN resolutions, thwarted UN inspection teams, developed chemical and biological weapons, and coveted nuclear capacity.

    He’s a bad guy. The world, and the Iraqi people, would be better off without him.

    But I also know that Saddam poses no imminent and direct threat to the United States, or to his neighbors, that the Iraqi economy is in shambles, that the Iraqi military a fraction of its former strength, and that in concert with the international community he can be contained until, in the way of all petty dictators, he falls away into the dustbin of history.

    I know that even a successful war against Iraq will require a US occupation of undetermined length, at undetermined cost, with undetermined consequences. I know that an invasion of Iraq without a clear rationale and without strong international support will only fan the flames of the Middle East, and encourage the worst, rather than best, impulses of the Arab world, and strengthen the recruitment arm of al-Qaeda.

    I am not opposed to all wars. I’m opposed to dumb wars.

    So for those of us who seek a more just and secure world for our children, let us send a clear message to the president today. You want a fight, President Bush? Let’s finish the fight with Bin Laden and al-Qaeda, through effective, coordinated intelligence, and a shutting down of the financial networks that support terrorism, and a homeland security program that involves more than color-coded warnings.

    You want a fight, President Bush? Let’s fight to make sure that the UN inspectors can do their work, and that we vigorously enforce a non-proliferation treaty, and that former enemies and current allies like Russia safeguard and ultimately eliminate their stores of nuclear material, and that nations like Pakistan and India never use the terrible weapons already in their possession, and that the arms merchants in our own country stop feeding the countless wars that rage across the globe.

    You want a fight, President Bush? Let’s fight to make sure our so-called allies in the Middle East, the Saudis and the Egyptians, stop oppressing their own people, and suppressing dissent, and tolerating corruption and inequality, and mismanaging their economies so that their youth grow up without education, without prospects, without hope, the ready recruits of terrorist cells.

    You want a fight, President Bush? Let’s fight to wean ourselves off Middle East oil, through an energy policy that doesn’t simply serve the interests of Exxon and Mobil.

    Those are the battles that we need to fight. Those are the battles that we willingly join. The battles against ignorance and intolerance. Corruption and greed. Poverty and despair.

    The consequences of war are dire, the sacrifices immeasurable. We may have occasion in our lifetime to once again rise up in defense of our freedom, and pay the wages of war. But we ought not – we will not – travel down that hellish path blindly. Nor should we allow those who would march off and pay the ultimate sacrifice, who would prove the full measure of devotion with their blood, to make such an awful sacrifice in vain.

    ReplyDelete
  9. ++

    Earth to Obama..

    HT : The Belmont Club

    And the winner is ...

    excerpt:

    [Andrew Sullivan:

    Petraeus deserves the lion's share of the credit; luck and time and the self-defeating nihilism of the Jihadists have helped. But Bush and McCain equally merit points for pursuing the surge, even though the metrics pointed to failure. Obama needs to capitalize on these gains, not dismiss them.]

    gasp!!

    [Now what about Obama? Boy, is the Good Judgement Man™ ever in trouble. He has been talking defeat in Iraq since forever. Whoops. McCain on the other hand has the distinction that, despite the unpopularity of his position, he was right. I predict a pivot - "I never knew how really vile those jihadis were. And I repudiate them for their obvious misjudgment. I have always been in favor of good relations with the Government of Iraq and no Republican is going to stand in the way of my achieving that goal. There are a number of companies in Chicago that would be excellent help in the effort to rebuild Iraq and they will have all my support." Aside to staff: "&#(*^@!~& Axelrod, where are my G-d Damn Tickets to Iraq?"]

    Obama is a big talker, not a walker.. and of course i could be wrong, but i still don't see him going to Iraq..

    ==

    ReplyDelete