Saturday, June 07, 2008

Regime Says Iranians Want Stricter Dress Code

The regime says 79% of Iranians want a stricter dress code.
(It sounds like more BS.)

The mullahs are worried that the Iranian youth are becoming too Westernized.
Fars News reported:

Meantime, a recent poll conducted by Iranian Students Polling Association (ISPA) on the Islamic dress code (Hijab) revealed that 79% of Tehranis are in favor of better Islamic attires for women.

The results also indicated that 21% of the participants believed the current female clothing is improper, while 66% others not only viewed it as improper, but also asked for preventative measures.

Also, 24% of the participants described Chador (overall clothing), 30% manteau and wimple and 25% manteau and scarf as the proper clothing for women.

The polling results further showed that 65% of Tehrani citizens believe the best way to improve the present situation regarding women's code of dressing is education and propagation of the proper dress code culture in the society.
Related... Michael Ledeen has a great piece today at The Wall Street Journal on the Iranian Regime and Evil.

5 comments:

  1. Since the black body bags Iranian women wear are too revealing of the horrifying female form, there's only one possible solution left for the devout Muslima who doesn't want to offend her pious male co-religionists:

    http://tinyurl.com/4s9tbj

    Let's negotiate with these people. They're rational, enlightened, humane, and full of empathy.

    You can tell by the way they treat their citizens.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I have been around enough barnyards in my time to smell BS a mile away.

    ReplyDelete
  3. ++

    excellent Ledeen piece..

    excerpt:

    [Yet they are with us again, and we are acting as we did in the last century. The world is simmering in the familiar rhetoric and actions of movements and regimes – from Hezbollah and al Qaeda to the Iranian Khomeinists and the Saudi Wahhabis – who swear to destroy us and others like us. Like their 20th-century predecessors, they openly proclaim their intentions, and carry them out whenever and wherever they can. Like our own 20th-century predecessors, we rarely take them seriously or act accordingly. More often than not, we downplay the consequences of their words, as if they were some Islamic or Arab version of "politics," intended for internal consumption, and designed to accomplish domestic objectives.

    Clearly, the explanations we gave for our failure to act in the last century were wrong. The rise of messianic mass movements is not new, and there is very little we do not know about them. Nor is there any excuse for us to be surprised at the success of evil leaders, even in countries with long histories and great cultural and political accomplishments. We know all about that. So we need to ask the old questions again. Why are we failing to see the mounting power of evil enemies? Why do we treat them as if they were normal political phenomena, as Western leaders do when they embrace negotiations as the best course of action?]


    unfortunately the world is full of doubting Thomas' who'd rather live surreptitiously via fantasyland reality shows than face the realities of the evil world they live in..

    they did not listen, they're not listening still, and to humanities peril, perhaps they never will..

    there will never be a utopia as long as evil exists.. there will always be evil as long as it's allowed to exist..

    it's quite apparent the anti crowd is not cognizant as to which side they're truly supporting.. or that they're quite literally propagating the evil by means of dissent = a wonderful tool for the right reasons.. but none the less an enemies best tool when it comes to combating evil.. obviously an unlearned history lesson for them as well..

    ==

    ReplyDelete
  4. Well, someone's got to say it....I think every lefty chick and female wannabe in this country should show their solidarity with the obamster, his islamo-fascist paymasters and spiritual wackjobs, and his other anti-American pals by wearing the muslim body-bag. Several good outcomes are certain:

    1. STDs will plummet as sex becomes a non-starter for the promiscuous set.
    2. Abortions will drop for the same reason.
    3. Since the bag-wearers can no longer even talk with us infidels, there will be far fewer instances where we are forced to advise them to "just shut up, ok?"
    4. Since far fewer (non-aborted) babies will be born and subjected to liberal parents, communism will be bred out of the American gene pool.

    Gotta love those burkhas.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous8:58 PM

    Here's a website with hijabi attire:
    http://hijabtrendz.com/
    (and bg, before you say it, I'm not a dhimmi, I'm just using the local mosque and Islamic Center libraries and need some hijab; I already told them I don't want to be a Muslim.)

    ReplyDelete