Tennessee Democratic Party Leaders are still questioning whether or not Barack Obama is a terrorist.
Tennessee Democratic Party Executive Committee member Fred Hobbs and Democratic superdelegate Lincoln Davis hash it out.
FOX News reported:
(56 seconds)
Don't worry-- It's just a distraction.
The Political Grapevine reported this earlier today:
The Barack Obama campaign may have to update its new Web site set up to combat vicious rumors thanks to a fellow Democrat.Follow-up Question: If their investigation concludes that BO is indeed a terrorist will they still be able to support him as the democratic nominee?
Tennessee Democratic Party Executive Committee member Fred Hobbs tells The City newspaper in Nashville, "I don't exactly approve of a lot of the things he stands for — and I'm not sure we know enough about him. He's got some bad connections, and he may be terrorist connected for all I can tell. It sounds kind of like he may be."
Hobbs was giving an interview to the paper about fellow Tennessee Congressman and Democratic superdelegate Lincoln Davis, who has not yet declared his support for Obama.
Reacting to Hobbs, Davis' Chief of Staff Beecher Frasier says he does not know for sure if Obama is terrorist connected, but he assumes he is not.
Ten of the Tennessee state’s 17 superdelegates still haven’t endorsed Obama.
The Tennessee Democratic Party later released a statement claiming the state's Democratic Party was united behind Obama.
...Except, of course, for those 10 of 17 superdelegates who won't endorse him.
Hat Tip Larwyn
Previously:
Dem Rep. Dan Boren Will Not Endorse "Liberal" Obama
Jewish Democratic Donor Bails on Obama
DEMS JUMP SHIP--- 2 More Moderates Stray From Obama ...Update: 3
Great post Jim,
ReplyDeleteAs it shines the light on this situation for all to see.
Obama hired, or had volunteers "performing" for him to use his lawyer-ease terrorist supporters and he attended private dinners with terrorist support of Hamas.
The man attended a church for 20 yeras that lauded Nation of Islam and wrote glowing articles about Hamas.
Yet Jim, you are not allowed to speculate on his Muslim background!
yeah, right....
Keep boxing Jim, throw good lefty upper cut, then a right hand jab to the face with a direct hit to bloody the nose.
That Democrats are wondering about all of Obama's bad connections from his past that he did not give up until finally the last few months shows that there is hope even for some democrats.
I hope these two men will come to their senses and look deeply into his background, including his connections to Marxist Oding that made a deal with radical Sharia Law Muslims. And including his brothers radical views as well. Obama went their, dressed the dress and supported Odinga and his brother in 2006.
They then allowed innocent Kenyans to die! While thugs for their side rioted and murdered people.
This is who Obama supports.
Good job!
++
ReplyDeleteright Joshua.. but lest not forget his connections to Rezko, Auchi, Alsammarae, Khalidi, Ayers, etc.. & their numerous connections (ie: Saddam/ Iraq OFF, Assad, Chavez/ FARC)..
besides, you know what they say about ass-u-me..
==
++
ReplyDeleteOT.. HT : RW
Cannonfire: Confirmed! Fitz is going after Obama
excerpt:
[Mr. Rezko then cites two names, “Governor Blagojevich and Senator Obama.” These names are his secret weapons. This is the pay-off of the con game. He wants the judge to know that he knows secrets about Blagojevich and Obama, and that this makes him a special case, exempt, protected, even magical. ...]
well, i don't trust Fitz, but this would sure make up for his farce of a "leak" trial.. hence i have to say..
GO GET EM FITZ!!
==
""I don't exactly approve of a lot of the things he stands for — and I'm not sure we know enough about him. He's got some bad connections, and he may be terrorist connected for all I can tell. It sounds kind of like he may be.""....
ReplyDeleteWell maybe Fred Hobbs is onto something here...
I don't know about you all but this bit fecal filled philosophy makes me wonder...
That sound you are hearing is the sound of the Democratic party splitting.
ReplyDeleteI smell the divine aroma of freshly popped corn......anyone want a bowl?
ReplyDeleteI don't trust the "fitz" any farther than I can throw my house.
You know Nahanni, about freaking time.
ReplyDeleteWe need choices. No party should have a monopoly. The democrats have given us little choices in the presidential races in the past years. First we had a traitor John Kerry running for president during a time of war.
And I don't care what anyone says. When he came back from Vietnam and lied before Congress, he became a traitor and by the way, we didn't need swift boaters to tell us that.
Now, we have a basically untested, unknown, racist running for president.
Again, are you kidding me or what?
The only thing that helps the democratic party is the totally hapless republican party. Instead of fighting back, they are all ducking and running for cover.
So the democrats are surrendering to our enemies and the republicans are surrendering to the democrats and both of them are talking about being the party of change.
You couldn't make this shit up.
Clowns to the left, jokers to the right, here I am.
BG,
ReplyDeleteYou go girl :) I think there needs to be a large list for everyone to see of all Obama's connections to the radical Islamist that are known for
1) supporting terrorist,
2) supporting CAIR,
3) supporting former PLO Yasser Arafat,
4) the so-called laughable moderate: Fatah Leader, Communist Moscow trained and PhD Thesis Writing Holocaust Denier Abbas,
5) supporting current Hamas leader
6) supporting Syria
7) supporting Iran
8) supporting Odinga
9) supporting his Sharia Law brother
10) supporting 20 years Hamas-lovin America-KKKin, former and obviously radical Muslim, Jeremiah Wright
This little light shined is brought to you by Bloggers and commenters like Jim at Gateway, BG, Nahanni, Michelle Malkin, Ed Morrisey, Accuracy In Media, DiscoverTheNetworks, Atlas Shrugs, Seraphic Secret, etc., etc., plus RadioPundits Hugh Hewitt, Michael Medved, Dennis Prager, Laura Ingrahm, and to many others to list, plus many other fine upstanding conservative commenters, TV personalities, etc., around this nation that believe we should know the truth about Obama's past and present connections to radical Islam. As it shines a light on his foreign policy in the future. It explains his stances toward Iran.
We should never cowtow to leftist worldviews and hypocrisy touting fake tolerance when they give none at all to the conservative right religious Jews or Christians. This is what gets America in trouble in the first place. Listening to them shout tolerance again while they indoctrinate children in to false idols and lost liberal causes of perversity.
While they simultaneously are intolerant of any other views to be heard in our schools, or in the public domain. They're trying to bring back the Fairness Doctrine as well, which would destroy the Conservative Movement revitalized by Ronald Reagan. They plot every single day to undo the gains made so far since his true audacity to speack truth to the evil in this world both at home and abroad.
The blatant hypocrisy of the left that no hands may be laid upon their false messiah is not a message we should cowtow to either. A media that for decades have brutally attacked all Christians of all denominations on the right, mocking, scoffing, jesting, making obscene movies, videos, music, cartoons, that degrade Priest, Christians and ministers of all denominations as "stupid, evil and wicked," creating obscene art, and pandering to radical anti-Christian leftist false preachers whenever it fits their worldview to attack the normative orthodoxy of Judeo-Christian worldview.
Yet the media largely has given a pass to Obama because suddenly they all got religion of the Marxist variety. The Marxist variety that supports Terrorist around the world. The only reason the biased left media states anything at all about Obama's radical ties is due to the efforts of the Right to expose it. And often times it is only to defend Obama and radical Islam around the world.
While they simultaneously throw traditional Israeli Jews and Judeo-Christians under the bus as being to radical..., huh?
From CNN's Middle East reporters like Christiane Amanpour(Muslim Father) to Fox's Geraldo, leftist will throw traditional Judeo-Christian values under the bus on TV daily in favor of their own false idols. And then yell tolerance, tolerance for all others. The left is intolerant of any traditional Judeo-Christian views, but will bend over to Muslim radicals. And like the above Journalist, their reports largely leave out the whole truth in favor a reporting a more benign Islam to an unsuspecting American public. I've watched both be apologist either for radical Islamics in Amanpours case, or for Obama in Geraldo's case. They fail to be skeptical journalist in favor of peer group, leftist mantras that endangers our natio.
It is the weird constant need for feelings of approval. The leftist need to be liked and stroked. And they'll go to almost any lengths including electing a dangerous candidate to the whitehouse.
What we do not need today is a bunch of calls for more careful nuanced approaches based in fear of the lefts demonizing the right.
This is exactly what the left wants and desires. That in fear Conservatives will not talk openly of these issues. Bloggers and jounralist cannot base their actions on living in fear of reprisals and demonization. They must report all aspects of the candidates. Both the right and the left have this responsibility. But the Conservatives must never cave into the fear of being called intolerant any longer. It is this false attack that is elminating any true open discussions in our nation. The left demonizes the Right for pointing out truth. The truth of Obama's radical connections, both past and present.
Do not be afraid. And keep shining light on his dark connections to radical Islam so that like any other candidate he must answer to the American public, including the "typical white person" because like every other peson in this country they have a say and a vote. He must answer for his seeming lack of good discernment. He must answer for his bad associations in his life like any candidate. He must answer for his indeciveness to leave that church of hatred, or his political hypocrisy of staying there. He is either incompetent or a liar.
He must answer for radical Islamic and Marxist connections. The voters have a Constitutional right to know so they may cast a well informed vote in November for the well-being and the future of our nation.
Gee, some of those democrats are finally waking up.
ReplyDelete