Monday, October 08, 2007

Dobson: "If Rudy Wins the Pro-Life & Pro-Family Movement Is Gone" (Video)

I do hope that someone out there in the Republican Party is paying attention to this serious controversy. The last thing Republicans need right now is to split the party in two a year before elections!

Unless, of course, Republicans are satisfied with potty-mouthed Hillary Clinton back in the White House again...
And, a Supreme Court stacked with a gaggle of Ruth Bader Ginsburg clones.

This is discouraging:

Video from Hannity and Colmes on Monday.
Somebody HELP!
Please, HELP!

Ace has more grim news.

12 comments:

  1. re: splitting the party....with mccain, specter, smith (rino, OR), hagel, warner, snow, collins, martinez, graham, et al claiming to be Republicans, the GOP is already split into Conservatives and LOSERS. If Guiliani is chosen, my family will stay at home on election day. No more votes until they stop spending like drunken democrats, the borders are SECURED, and the illegal aliens are sent packing. Guiliani will accomplish none of this.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sigh....

    You certainly wont get what you wish for out of the Democrats. You know, those important things like secured borders and the illegals sent home.

    Oh no, you will have open borders and you will have them granted full citizenship as soon as they cross the border. Hell, even Babs Boxer wants them counted as CITIZENS on the 2010 census (to make sure California stays "democratic no doubt.). Not only that you will have the government totally controlling your life. You think they do now? Just wait until Hillarycare gets rammed through-under it you will have to qualify for government health care before you can get or keep a job. From what I have been seeing out of the UK the government will use that power to make you do exactly what it wants.

    So before you start being Mr. "I'm sitting it out so Hillary will win, WAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!" you better think LONG and HARD about it. You just mihgt find that there are some things just a teensy-weensy more important in the greater scheme of things.

    Sheesh, even my sister who is married to a Missouri synod Lutheran pastor realizes that there are some things that are just a bit more important then voting for someone based solely on whether they are pro-life or not.

    So, go ahead, sit it out and end up with Hillary as President with the Democrats controlling the congress and senate. Just don't come back crying crocodile tears over the crap that will happen. By sitting it out you will have voted them in.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous5:09 AM

    Guiliani will accomplish none of this.

    Dude, what do you think Madame Hildabeast will do?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Most of what Dobson had to say (including the topic title-quote) is utter nonsense.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous10:12 AM

    This is sad. I am a social con myself -- but goodness, you have to be wise here too. Hilary will do far worse, and far from us "fighting" her, she'll have carte blanche to do as she pleases, aided and abetted by MSM. How can you possibly bring in the worst choice over the bad one?

    Please Dr. Dobson, don't do this...this is political suicide.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous12:02 PM

    James Dobson WANTS Hillary to be the next president. That way, he gets to be more self-righteous and rake in even more money. Dobson's ego, not patriotism, is what motivates him.

    ReplyDelete
  7. ++

    geesh, no one ever said "common sense"
    was partisan, but it is apparently dead..

    ==

    ReplyDelete
  8. ++

    hmm, what's that saying.. "people who don't learn from their previous mistakes are bound to repeat them" sounds about right..

    as not only have the Reps not learned their lesson via the Dems winning Congress thanks to voters biting off their nose to spite their face, but evidentally, neither have the voters, go fig..

    ==

    ReplyDelete
  9. ++

    Nahanni @ 2:27 AM

    well stated.. (thumbsup)

    however i would add "national security".. as like it or not.. we are in a global war not of our making.. a war that if we're lucky, will only take another 40 to 50 years to win.. just think how much quciker & assured we'd be of losing it with the Dhimmis in charge of everything.. hence, *sigh* doesn't begin to cover it..

    ps: remember both the Dems et al & AQ et al want global domination.. one under a Sharia Caliphate, the other under UN Internationl Law..

    ==

    ReplyDelete
  10. Anonymous3:19 PM

    Dobson is wrong and needs to stop speaking with the votes of others that he does not have. I’m a born-again Christian, so is my wife, so are the wives and husbands that I most closely associate with. All of us plan to vote for Rudy if he gets the Republican nomination.

    Those who say that they will stay home are just making noise.

    Dobson needs to get his head screwed on straight before he damages his own ability to do good in the world.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I've heard it before, but Perot stepped in when Reagan couldn't curb spending, and Bush 41 promised, "Read my lips, no new taxes!" Regardless of the cultural war in which we find ourselves, social liberals must be rejected as the representatives of big government that they are. Conservatism works, every time its tried, and in every context. Settling for second best does not work in my life, and won't attract my vote....ever. You folks can court mediocrity all you want. Now THERE'S a worthy goal! Our Founders would be so proud of you. Especially Patrick Henry, Nathan Hale, and, in his day, Davy Crockett. My point remains.... the "gang of fourteen" rules, the "nuclear" option was NOT implemented, and the GOP is split to the point of impotence right now. This is the time to search for and choose a Conservative as our candidate. If, as you seem to imply, our country will fail as a result of a Republican electoral failure, the Jeffersonian call to arms is still relevant. (BTW, Rudy favors gun control, also.)

    ReplyDelete
  12. ++

    i actually favor Mitt over Rudy..

    but the Supreme Court is my main concern.. i still can't believe they protected "virtual child porn" via the Constitution (well, the ACLU's version of it anyways).. and that was in 2002, president being GWB at the time.. *sigh*

    ==

    ReplyDelete