Saturday, November 03, 2007

Another Grim Milestone... Iraqis Return to Baghdad

US fatalities are down in Iraq:

(LA Times)

Violent Deaths are down in Iraq:

(Aswat Aliraq)

Now, another grim milestone...
Iraqi civilians are returning to Baghdad.
The AP reported:

BAGHDAD (AP) - In a dramatic turnaround, more than 3,000 Iraqi families driven out of their Baghdad neighborhoods have returned to their homes in the past three months as sectarian violence has dropped, the government said Saturday.
Saad al-Azawi, his wife and four children are among them. They fled to Syria six months ago, leaving behind what had become one of the capital's more dangerous districts—west Baghdad's largely Sunni Khadra region.

The family had been living inside a vicious and bloody turf battle between al-Qaida in Iraq and Mahdi Army militiamen. But Azawi said things began changing, becoming more peaceful, in August when radical anti-American Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr ordered his Mahdi Army fighters to stand down nationwide...

...U.S. officials say, al-Qaida overplayed its hand with Iraq's Sunnis, who practice a moderate version of Islam. American forces were quick to capitalize on the upheaval, welcoming former Sunni enemies as colleagues in securing what was once the most dangerous region of the country.

And as 30,000 additional U.S. forces arrived for the crackdown in Baghdad and central Iraq, the American commander, Gen. David Petraeus, began stationing many of them in neighborhood outposts. The mission was not only to take back control but to foster neighborhood groups like the one in Khadra to shake off al-Qaida's grip.
What's next?... Safe streets?
It looks like democrats are going to have to make some changes to that 2006 platform on defeat.

UPDATE: Malcommxpark notes that there were more murders in Philly last month than soldiers lost in Iraq.

UPDATE 2: Anbar Sunni leaders stress on partnership with the US.
Hat Tip BG

UPDATE 3: Matt Sanchez writes on Iraq:

But while sectarian violence has plummeted, too many media outlets have stopped reporting on what is, by far, the most defining event of this century.

A free people need a free press, but through omission, exaggeration, bias and just flat-out deceit, the American public has been taken for a ride – and we will all be paying a price.
And, Michelle Malkin reports on the growing number of days when no one was killed in Iraq.

12 comments:

  1. ++

    Baghdad streets now safer, say taxi drivers

    excerpts:

    [Mohammed and his fellow taxi drivers like Abu Saif are ready barometers to assess these military claims. As they drive through the city they, probably more than anybody else, have witnessed the security plan being implemented.

    Saif says that he too now feels safer as he drives the city streets.

    "I feel more secure when I move from one neighbourhood to another," the 38-year-old says.]

    [But Saif says that these days he can operate in all neighbourhoods.

    Mohammed echoes his views: "For two months now security has improved," he says.

    "There was a time when nobody could drive into some dangerous neighbourhoods such as Dora, Saidiyah or Amel and even Ghazaliyah. But now I can go anywhere."

    He cites central Baghdad's Shorja market as another indication of improved security. The most popular market in the whole country has shops which now stay open until late in the evening.]

    ["I have driven women many times now, even in the evening. Earlier it was impossible for a woman to be alone on the streets of Baghdad."

    Mohammed, who has lived through three coups and three wars in Iraq, says his clients do not talk about sectarian differences.

    "They think it is a conspiracy against Iraq," he says as he negotiates a main road with adjacent walls plastered with posters of religious leaders.]

    great news!! (thumbsup)

    ==

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hey bg, did you note the FACTBOX-Security developments in Iraq, Nov 4 link?

    Good, ole Reuters just wants to make sure its readers don't overdose on to much good news or its a sop to poor Harry 'the fairy Reid and the dashing of his dreams...

    ReplyDelete
  3. It's interesting to see how the NY Times recently editorialized about how President Bush ignored the exodus of Iraqis, yet they seem to be silent on the reverse exodus. I reprinted the editorial in question at my site.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous10:00 AM

    If it keeps up for another month or two the war is essentially won.

    How are the Dems going to handle this when they did everything possible to sabotage the effort?

    ReplyDelete
  5. ++

    Iraqis

    Iraqi diaspora

    excerpts:

    [Estimates vary on the size of the Iraqi diaspora. According to one estimate, 4-5 million (compared to pre-war 2000 population estimate of 22,675,617) were in exile before the American invasion. They fled from the regime of Saddam Hussein, though some may have left earlier.

    However, in the Iraqi legislative election, December 2005, only 1.2 million Iraqi exiles were estimated to be living in the 14 countries with the highest exile populations. Less than 300,000 voted.]

    [About 2,000 Iraqis are entering
    the country each day as of 2006.]

    ==

    ReplyDelete
  6. ++

    re: bg @ 10:11 AM Iraqi dispora link..

    One in six Iraqis are in exile, and they want this war

    excerpt:

    [But what the majority think, in the words of one careful student of Iraqi opinion, is that "military action is the price that has to be paid for the removal of the regime, and this is also the view of most Iraqis in the country". Iraqis at home, leaving aside those so complicit with the regime that they fear change will bring disaster and death to their families, are "worried about bombs raining down on them but things are so bad that they will take that prospect on... People in Iraq are waiting for the strike to happen".

    There are few followers among Iraqis, according to the same source, for the "wait until he dies" school, and much fear of the chaos that might come as as Saddam's sons and followers strive to survive. By contrast, most Iraqis regard western predictions about civil war in the aftermath of an American attack as almost racist.]

    imho that explains a lot of the rhetoric.. well
    to be perfectly clear, the MSM spun rhetoric..

    ==

    ReplyDelete
  7. ++

    CORRECTION re: bg @ 11:08 AM..

    imho that not only explains but also debunksa lot of the rhetoric.. well to be perfectly clear, the MSM spun rhetoric..

    ==

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous11:36 AM

    Some very interesting articles. When I bring up the lowering death toll among my (widely read) peers, they always bring up the millions of Iraqis that have fled the violence due to ethnic cleansing and the like. Sounds like that, too, is overblown, However, you missed the exodus post-election; according to that Wikipedia link, the numbers currently stand at about 2,400,000, up from the 1,200,000 that were gone at the time of the election. So one could argue that the removal of Saddam hasn't been an entirely good thing, but that net-net it has improved lives based on the Iraqi diaspora count...assuming I'm reading things right. Then there's the article posted that says the Iraqi Diaspora wants this war. Which kinda puts a damper on the people who use that group to argue against war. Of course, it also says that 1 in 6 Iraqis is a refugee...which (based on Wikipedia's count of Iraq's population at 22 million and change) puts the refugee population at about 3.8 million. Bleh for conflicting numbers...

    ReplyDelete
  9. Here's the bad news, the percentage of American soldiers killed is rising. In November 2006, 2% of the killed were Americans. The percentage of American deaths peaked in September 2007 at 8%, but still was at 4.7% in October. More Americans are being killed on a percentage basis.

    I'm surprised the media hasn't covered this.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Anonymous1:12 PM

    Yeah, jabba, and hillary's a capitalist. Your numbers are not credible, except to koolaid drinkers and other moonbats.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Thanks for the link to www.malcolmxpark.org, but I wanted to make sure your readers were aware that, if icasualties.org's numbers are correct, there were 42 coalition casualties in Iraq in October. There were 30 murders in Philadelphia during the same period. According to the same source, 679 Iraqi Security Forces and civilians were also killed during the same period. Though it's unfortunately become a commonplace, I don't think comparisons between Philadelphia and Iraq serve to put either place's problems into perspective.

    ReplyDelete
  12. ++

    Math_Mage @ 11:36 AM..

    there hasn't been one report that i've read (including the UN's) that lists the same numbers of refugees.. as for overblown, of that i am positive..

    note the 2,000 returning each day.. first time i've heard that one.. but there must be some truth to it being the numbers fluctuate from report to report.. either that, or it could be a way to explain the overblown numbers ie: they always remember to add, but consistently forget to subtract..

    at any rate, they will never have the correct numbers.. i look at it this way..

    take the highest number, divide by 2, half left under Saddam, the other post war..

    however, whatever the refugees number, it still doesn't come close to the number of people who were slaughtered, displaced, or lived as refugees in their own country via Saddam's regime..

    ps: that link is as of 2002 (pre-war), we've learned quote a bit more about Saddam's atrocities since then..

    ==

    ReplyDelete