Yesterday, it was the news that democratic-General Petraeus-bashing MoveOn.org gets super discounts from The New York Times...
Today we are supposed believe, according to The Washington Post, that Rudy Giuliani is soft on terror.
This is, of course, America's mayor who told the Saudi Sheik to stick it after 9-11.
But, the shamefully biased media is pushing that Rudy is soft on terror... while ignoring the pitiful bunch of democrats (Example: Hillary Clinton) rushing to cut and run from the fight against Al Qaeda in Iraq.
Please- give me a freaking break.
Hi, I work for BBC World Service radio in London and today (Monday 24th September) between 1pm and 2pm East Coast Time in the States we will be discussing in our programme, World Have Your Say, whether the Iranian president should be allowed to visit Ground Zero. If you would like to take part in the radio discussion please call me at +442075570635 or email me your phone numbers at martin.vennard@bbc.co.uk
ReplyDeleteMany thanks
Martin Vennard
BBC World Service radio.
Didn't see any "tripe" myself, it was spot on, Rudy and his team do not seem to understand Islam, something that is essential to formulate policy to deal with this threat. I'd go for McCain, Tancredo, or even Huckabee before Rudy's same ole politics approach.
ReplyDelete++
ReplyDeleteAnonymous @ 8:13 AM
don't need to understand Islam.. if anything, Islam needs to understand there is a huge difference between good & evil.. i also see no need to either study nor consult the Koran in order to understand the barbarism of AQ et al.. it's US (the civilized world) or them (mufsidun), Muslims included, as Muslims are their main kill, and who more than Muslims themselves understand Islam..
==