Sunday, May 18, 2008

Bush Slams "Isolationist-Protectionist" Democratic Candidates

"There are voices in my country that urge America to adopt measures that would isolate us from the global economy. I firmly reject these calls for protectionism."

President George W. Bush
World Economic Forum
Sharm el Sheikh International Congress Center
Sharm el Sheikh, Egypt
May 18, 2008
President George W. Bush touted the Democracies of Iraq and Afghanistan during his speech at the World Economic Forum in Sharm el Sheikh, Egypt today.

President George W. Bush stands with Iraqi leaders after their meeting Sunday, May 18, 2008, in Sharm El Sheikh, Egypt. With him from left are: Hoshyar Zeban, Foreign Minister, Vice President Abd al-Mahdi, and Deputy Prime Minister Barham Salih. (White House photo by Chris Greenberg)

President Bush also slammed Democrats for their isolationist-protectionist agenda.

Both Democratic candidates are pushing isolationist platforms this year. Canada has already threatened to disrupt the US gas flow if NAFTA is cancelled.
The White House reported:

America is a much younger nation, but we've made our mark by advancing ideals as old as the pyramids. Those ideals of liberty and justice have sparked a revolution across much of the world. This hopeful movement made its way to places where dictators once reigned and peaceful democracies seemed unimaginable: places like Chile and Indonesia and Poland and the Philippines and South Korea. These nations have different histories and different traditions. Yet each made the same democratic transition, and they did it on their own terms. In these countries, millions every year are rising from poverty. Women are realizing overdue opportunities. And people of faith are finding the blessing of worshiping God in peace.

All these changes took place in the second half of the 20th century. I strongly believe that if leaders like those of you in this room act with vision and resolve, the first half of 21st century can be the time when similar advances reach the Middle East. This region is home to energetic people, a powerful spirit of enterprise, and tremendous resources. It is capable of a very bright future -- a future in which the Middle East is a place of innovation and discovery, driven by free men and women.

In recent years, we've seen hopeful beginnings toward this vision. Turkey, a nation with a majority Muslim population, is a prosperous modern democracy. Afghanistan under the leadership of President Karzai is overcoming the Taliban and building a free society. Iraq under the leadership of Prime Minister Maliki is establishing a multi-ethnic democracy. We have seen the stirrings of reform from Morocco and Algeria to Jordan and the Gulf States. And isolation from the outside world is being overcome by the most democratic of innovations: the cell phone and the Internet. America appreciates the challenges facing the Middle East. Yet the light of liberty is beginning to shine...

One of the most powerful drivers of economic growth is free trade. So nations in this region would benefit greatly from breaking down barriers to trade with each other. And America will continue working to open up trade at every level. In recent years, the United States has completed free trade agreements with Jordan, Oman, Morocco, and Bahrain. America will continue to negotiate bilateral free trade agreements in the region. We strongly supported Saudi Arabia's accession to the World Trade Organization, and we will continue to support nations making the reforms necessary to join the institutions of a global economy. To break down trade barriers and ignite economic growth around the world, we will work tirelessly for a successful outcome to the Doha Round this year.

As we seek to open new markets abroad, America will keep our markets open at home. There are voices in my country that urge America to adopt measures that would isolate us from the global economy.

I firmly reject these calls for protectionism. We will continue to welcome foreign investment and trade. And the United States of America will stay open for business.
In an unprecedented move this year, Congressional Democrats led by Nancy Pelosi decided to kill the Colombia free trade agreement. Her efforts will damage the economic and security interests of the U.S. while trashing our best ally in Latin America.

Meanwhile, Barack Obama has denounced the Free Trade Agreement with ally Colombia but has pushed for trade with anti-American Communist Cuba.

More... Dick Morris suggests that Bush could help Republicans if he were to get out of the White House and promote his record-- including that we are winning in Iraq and that the economic numbers are not as bad as most people think.

16 comments:

  1. Squealing begins in 5..4..3..2..

    ReplyDelete
  2. ++

    i don't view it as Bush slamming anyone.. he just "tells it like it is".. (thumbsup)

    ==

    ReplyDelete
  3. Barack Obama has denounced the Free Trade Agreement with ally Colombia but has pushed for trade with anti-American Communist Cuba.

    Of course he wants trade with all of his and the Democratic party's Communist/Marxist/Islamofascist friends.

    You see, their enemies and Obama and the Democratic party's enemies are one in the same. Their mutual enemy is the US and the American people.

    When the history of this time is written people will be astounded at the fact that we are allowing traitors to occupy some of the highest offices of the land despite the fact that they are openly collaborating with people who have sworn to destroy this country.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous12:26 AM

    Here's one for you, bg, if you don't already have it. This is a bit off-road, but if you don't see it now, it may be down later. the last 1/3 is new, and especially interesting.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous3:39 AM

    According to Jorge Bush, any enforcement of immigration law is BIGOTRY AND ISOLATIONISM...any domestic engineering and manufacturing is ISOLATIONISM AND PROTECTIONISM.

    Jorge is not the President of the United States, he's the President of the World Free Trade Zone.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous6:00 AM

    I believe NAFTA should be expanded to include all friendly countries within North, Central and South Americas. It is in our benefit to see all countries have a strong economy.
    The answer is not to bring every person who wants a better life for their families to the United States but to help extend that promise within our hemisphere and within their own countries.

    ReplyDelete
  7. An excellent idea, TaSS!!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous9:31 AM

    One problem Tass, how old are you? Are you old enough to remember 1991-92? That's what Jorge's papi, Bush 41 told us along with Slick Willy Clinton, that NAFTA will improve the economies of the chronically corrupt Mexico, so their peasants don't all come here illegally, work illegally, lower wages for Americans, evade income tax, commit social security fraud, etc.

    A poll taken in Mexico just weeks ago, showed around 46% of Mexicans wish to leave their country and "go north".

    What are we to do? Export all our manufacturing to Mexico, so we become weak and dependent - no longer a proud, independent, sovereign nation but a co-dependent of a regional North American "community"? What a load a crap. How pathetic. We have squandered our forefather's legacy and turned into a snivelling, dependent shadow of our former self.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anonymous10:05 AM

    Anonymous said...

    One problem Tass, how old are you? Are you old enough to remember 1991-92?

    I'm young enough to still be idealistic and old enough to be cynical of my idealism.
    Look up Mexico's economy. It has grown to be the 12th largest in the world. Poverty was reduced by NAFTA and other free trade agreements from almost 50% to 17.6%.
    It's not an instant cure and it is not going to stop people from looking over the border and wanting better for their families but it is in all our best interests if the countries we live with, develop strong economies for the future and it is a step in that direction.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Anonymous2:21 PM

    Hmm, Tass, you seem very interested ansd concerned over Mexicans and in fact all others who aren't Americans. You apparently think it's up to the US to raise the standard of living of every nation in the world?

    I don't believe Nafta stats, the books are cooked. You are right, that the chronically corrupt Mexico is around the 12-14th wealthiest nation in the world, which begs my question, why then do they not create more jobs for their people?

    I do not believe as Jorge Bush and you apparently do, that simply finding an illegal job, from a crooked employer is a qualification for becomming an American.

    Mexico receives more US visas for legal immigration than any other country in the world and they also lead in illegal aliens trespassing as well. It will never end my friend, never end until Mexico is emptied out. They were corrupt, they are corrupt and they will be corrupt. Their leading source of revenue is remittances sent home from immigrants (legal and illegal), how embarassing for them.

    What are your thoughts on further "integration" or a purported North American Union? Good idea?

    ReplyDelete
  11. ++

    may be a bit OT, but it may apply..

    David Mamet: Why I Am No Longer a 'Brain-Dead Liberal'

    excerpt:

    [And I realized that the time had come for me to avow my participation in that America in which I chose to live, and that that country was not a schoolroom teaching values, but a marketplace.

    "Aha," you will say, and you are right. I began reading not only the economics of Thomas Sowell (our greatest contemporary philosopher) but Milton Friedman, Paul Johnson, and Shelby Steele, and a host of conservative writers, and found that I agreed with them: a free-market understanding of the world meshes more perfectly with my experience than that idealistic vision I called liberalism.]

    of course i don't agree with everything he wrote, but it is a thought provoking & entertaining read all the same imo..

    ==

    ReplyDelete
  12. ++

    Bush takes Arabs to task over oppression

    excerpt:

    [Mr. Bush, speaking to 1,500 government and business leaders in the Egyptian Red Sea coastal resort town of Sharm el Sheik, ended his five - day trip to the Middle East by drawing attention to the autocratic governments in the region and by rebuking critics of his democracy agenda as practicing a "condescending form of moral relativism."

    "The time has come for nations across the Middle East to abandon these practices, and treat their people with dignity and the respect they deserve," Mr. Bush said. "I call on all nations to release their prisoners of conscience, open up their political debate and trust their people to chart their future."]

    RTWT..

    i think Bush is back!! (thumbsup)

    ==

    ReplyDelete
  13. ++

    ytba @ 12:26 AM..

    thanks (i have seen it before, but always forget to copy & paste the link).. ;)

    ==

    ReplyDelete
  14. Anonymous3:51 AM

    "You apparently think it's up to the US to raise the standard of living of every nation in the world?"

    Do you really need me to explain why having stable, democratic countries with successful economies in our hemisphere or on our border, IS in the best interest of the United States?
    I don't believe I said anything about legalizing the illegal immigrants in the United States. As far as I am concerned, I would open a guest worker program but I would not extend citizenship to them OR their children. They would go to the end of the line. Fair is fair and those who have obeyed our laws, should be first.
    And our guest worker program should operate similar to Canada, which means, if there is an American who can do that job, that slot is first filled by them. Slam down on the hiring of illegals and you won't have to build a fence. Let's enforce our own laws.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Anonymous3:57 AM

    And one more thing, any politician or elected official who refuses to uphold the laws of the United States or their jurisdiction, I would drag screaming and kicking from office.
    They don't get to decide what laws they are upholding or enforcing. We are a nation of laws and they have sworn to uphold those laws.

    ReplyDelete