Barack Obama is having trouble with Jewish voters who have realistic doubts about his commitment to Israel.
It might have something to do with Obama's long history and close associations with Jew-haters:
(Top left clockwise) Barack and Michelle Obama and radical anti-Israel Professor Edward Said at a May 1998 Arab community event in Chicago at which Edward Said gave the keynote speech. (Bill Baar's West Side), Former PLO operative and close friend of the Obama's Rashid Khalidi, Barack Obama and his racist anti-Semitic minister Jeremiah Wright, and terrorist anti-American friend William Ayers.
Maybe he could pass out some "Trumpet" magazines before his talk?
Or, he could pass out articles from his church magazine and newsletters on:
Supporting Hamas
Supporting Hezbollah
Honoring Louis Farrakhan
Danegerus includes a partial list of Obama's anti-Semitic "advisors" below including:
Samantha PowerShocker! After his talk, CNN is praising Obama's terrific speech to the Jewish community today.
Edward Said
Rashid Khalidi
Ali Abunimah
Imam Hassan Qazwini
General Tony McPeak
Robert Malley
Susan Rice
Anthony Lake
William C. Ayers
Bernadine Dohrn
Raila Odinga
Zbigniew Brzezinski
Jodie Evans
The Black Panthers
Lawrence Lessig
Sam Graham-Felsen
Joseph Cirincione
Cornell West
Bob McCarty shares more concerns about Barack Obama.
Did anyone hear Opie and Anthony this morning? They had the comedian Gallagher on and he said, "Jews are never going to vote for Obama because he is an arab-kind-of-guy and he has the word 'BOMB' in his name." Lol.
ReplyDeleteWhile I agree with you that Obama has extensive ties with some questionable characters, I can't agree with you that Edward Said is in the same category as Jeremiah Wright. While I disagree with the conclusions reached in most of Said's scholarly work, including 'Orientalism,' you can't paint him with the 'radical anti-Israel' brush just for advancing new theories on the way the West interacts with the East. His contribution to our understanding of Middle Eastern history is very important, even if he was mostly incorrect.
ReplyDelete++
ReplyDeleteHT : Rezko (Obama) Watch
Reagan's would-be assassin aided by top Obama adviser
excerpt:
["Obama has repeatedly attacked Sen. John McCain for purportedly allowing lobbyists to serve as top advisers," Klein wrote.
However, Jake Tapper of ABC News's The Political Punch blog noted May 19, 2008, "There's a big difference between a lobbyist, who is paid to interact with lawmakers such as Mr. Obama, and a lawyer, who works with the courts. But in this situation, Gonzalez's indictment has complicated passage of the U.S.-Panama Free Trade Agreement."]
Barack Obama is a virtual puppet, an empty suit controlled by many ominous puppeteers strings..
ie:
Soros
Brezinski
Ayers
Wright
McPeak
Malley
Rezko
Auchi
Alsammarae
Khalidi
Farrakhan
and many more..
not to mention Obama's direct connections to many other ominous connections..
ie:
Chavez
Qaddafi
Saddam (when alive of course)
and others..
==
Barack Hussein Obama has surrounded himself with anti-Semites, terrorists and terror apologists.
ReplyDeleteSNOBama's "fathers":
"Mentor" Frank Davis
"Reverend" Al Sharpton
"Reverend" James Meeks
"Reverend" Jeremiah Wright
"Reverend" Otis Moss III
"Minister" Louis Farrakhan
"Pastor" Michael Pfleger
"Reverend" James Bevel
"Reverend" Eric Lee
"Pastor" Mack King
"Bishop" Desmond Tutu
SNOBama's "money men":
George Soros
Syrian Tony Rezko
Saddam Hussein's gun-running bagman Nadhmi Auchi
SNOBama's anti-Semitic "advisors":
Samantha Power
Edward Said
Rashid Khalidi
Ali Abunimah
Imam Hassan Qazwini
General Tony McPeak
Robert Malley
Susan Rice
Anthony Lake
William C. Ayers
Bernadine Dohrn
Raila Odinga
Zbigniew Brzezinski
Jodie Evans
The Black Panthers
Lawrence Lessig
Sam Graham-Felsen
Joseph Cirincione
Cornell West
Judging by the people he surrounds himself with, Barack Hussein Obama intends to "Wipe Israel Off the Map".
Not to mention some of Barack Hussein Obama's more interesting supporters:
Hamas
Iran
Hatem El-Hady
FARC
Hugo Chavez
Fidel Castro
Daniel Ortega
Maria "Che Flag" Isabel
Mayor "Let 'em Drown" Nagin
Jimmy "Hamas" Carter
Jim McDermott(D)
++
ReplyDeletethanks DANEgerus @ 3:57 PM..
==
Obama must have missed the memo early on about how he has to kiss Jewish ass to get anywhere in politics in Israel... er, I mean America.
ReplyDeleteFace it, our political system is owned by Jews. We don't even give our politicians the right to hear all sides of the issue, because after all, only the Jewish narrative exists.
When Bush went over to Israel to "celebrate" the 60th anniversary, did he even bother to visit any Palestinian refugees?
Correct me if I'm wrong (and I'm not so don't waste your time trying), when Israel was created, OTHER PEOPLE WERE ALREADY LIVING THERE!!!
But hey, in this country, which is Israel's little bitch, none of the other side matters.
Remind me again, why is that we cater endlessly and without question, to Jews and Israel? What have they ever done for us? Why is their narrative the only one we allow?
So go ahead and kiss Jewish ass all you want... I'll stick to thinking for myself, thank you very much.
++
ReplyDeletea tad OT..
Court backs claim that al-Dura killing was staged
==
++
ReplyDeleteAnonymous @ 4:05 PM..
so why then is Obama driving around
in circle's trying to kiss Joo arses??
==
Obama's got a long way to go to win this constiuency, and as he may be wrapping up soon, Wright, Ayers, and the gang will only get a couple of more big turns in the media cycle.
ReplyDeleteBring it on!!
"...when Israel was created, OTHER PEOPLE WERE ALREADY LIVING THERE!!!..."
ReplyDeleteAnd those arabs, who were living in a desert wasteland, were laughing at the Jews who bought the land from them. That is until the Jews learned to cultivate the sand.
Anyway, those Arabs didn't LEAVE Israel until the other ARAB nations (Egypt/Jordan/Syria) declared WAR and INVADED the newly founded Israel with the PROMISE of giving those Jordanians (now called "palestinians") the conquered land to them after they defeated and massacred the JEWS.
Those "palestinians" only left after the crushing defeat of the ARAB INVADERS at the hands of the JEWS; the righteous result for the traitors they were.
Why don't YOU read up on the actual HISTORY! The answers are in the details.
++
ReplyDeleteAnon @ 5:19 PM..
["...when Israel was created, OTHER PEOPLE WERE ALREADY LIVING THERE!!!..." ]
Imperial History of the Middle East
a visual history if you will.. as there is just too much to catch you up on as far as the literal history goes..
==
So go ahead and kiss Jewish ass all you want... I'll stick to thinking for myself, thank you very much.
ReplyDeleteJudging from your post, you don't do much "thinking" at all.
The only thing you've established beyond all doubt is that you'd have made a very fine "Inquiring Camera Girl" for Der Stürmer
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Der_St%C3%BCrmer
++
ReplyDeletecorrection re: bg @ 5:29 PM..
was meant for Anon @ 4:05 PM..
my apologies to Anon @ 5:19 PM..
==
anonatrd 4:05pm,
ReplyDeleteCorrect me if I'm wrong (and I'm not so don't waste your time trying), when Israel was created, OTHER PEOPLE WERE ALREADY LIVING THERE!!!
If that is the case then you should most wholeheartedly agree that Pakistan and Bangladesh (former East Pakistan) should be given back to India.
In fact, unlike Israel, there was never a time in history where a country named "Pakistan" ever existed. It was created because Jinnah threatened civil war if the British did not give him what he wanted. The creation of Pakistan was one of the most bloody affairs in the history of the world where millions died. Pakistan to this day does nothing but create problems for all it's neighbors through it's sponsorship of terrorism.
Bangladesh has always been a basketcase because it was torn out of the heart of Bengal for no other reason outside of the population was More Moslem then not. It has always been the poorest part of that province that was dependent on the rest of Bengal for food. Bangladesh historically grew the jute that was made into rope in Calcutta and the money they made off that crop went to buy rice. Jinnah did not care about that, he did not care if people starved there-all he wanted was a Moslem state that he could rule.
So, anonatard, using your logic then the world should demand the immediate reunification of Bangladesh and Pakistan with India.
If you do not agree then all it serves to show is your hatreds and biases. Which makes you no different then a member of the KKK or the Nazi party. I guess that it does also make you a good Islamofascist and a Democrat.
Anon @ 5:19:
ReplyDeleteOkay, so when Israel was formed in 1948, no one, absolutely no one, was living on that land at that time? Because if people were living on that land, they were forced to leave to make room for the Jewish invaders.
Whole villages that were on the map in 1947 were no longer on the map in 1948. Where did those go?
People living in those villages in 1948 were living in refugee camps, especially in the Gaza Strip. Was that b/c they just liked the idea of living in a tent?
No, it's b/c the Jews decided this land belonged to them b/c of something written in a book over 2000 years ago.
And a response to someone else:
Obama is kissing Jew ass b/c they freaking control everything! Are you kidding me? If they didn't, if they were just like any other constituency, then why all this hoopla over them?
Get real! You people have all been taken in by the Jewish narrative. Not just the people on this board, but Americans in general.
Why else would we act to our own security detriment just to please Israel? I'm sorry, but I care about this country, about the US, not about Israel. I don't give a rat's ass what happens to Israel. It's not an American state, it's another country, just like hundreds on the globe.
what makes it more important than any other country? Why do we sacrifice our own national self-interest to please Israel?
Ask yourselves that question!
++
ReplyDeleteAnonymous @ 6:23 PM..
how about asking why the Arab nations deserted Palestinians in their singular quest to "wipe Israel off the map"??
The world's collective amnesia
excerpt:
["The fact that there are these refugees is the direct consequence of the act of the Arab states in opposing partition and the Jewish state. The Arab states agree upon this policy unanimously and they must share in the solution of the problem."
– Emile Ghoury, secretary of the Palestinian Arab Higher Committee, in an interview with the Beirut Telegraph Sept. 6, 1948.
"The Arab state which had encouraged the Palestine Arabs to leave their homes temporarily in order to be out of the way of the Arab invasion armies, have failed to keep their promise to help these refugees."
– The Jordanian daily newspaper Falastin, Feb. 19, 1949.
"Who brought the Palestinians to Lebanon as refugees, suffering now from the malign attitude of newspapers and communal leaders, who have neither honor nor conscience? Who brought them over in dire straits and penniless, after they lost their honor? The Arab states, and Lebanon amongst them, did it."
– The Beirut Muslim weekly Kul-Shay, Aug. 19, 1951.
"The 15th May, 1948, arrived … On that day the mufti of Jerusalem appealed to the Arabs of Palestine to leave the country, because the Arab armies were about to enter and fight in their stead."
– The Cairo daily Akhbar el Yom, Oct. 12, 1963.
"For the flight and fall of the other villages it is our leaders who are responsible because of their dissemination of rumors exaggerating Jewish crimes and describing them as atrocities in order to inflame the Arabs … By spreading rumors of Jewish atrocities, killings of women and children etc., they instilled fear and terror in the hearts of the Arabs in Palestine, until they fled leaving their homes and properties to the enemy."
– The Jordanian daily newspaper Al Urdun, April 9, 1953.]
btw: how many nations has tiny old Israel threatened to "wipe off the map"??
++
ReplyDeleteAnon @ 6:23 PM..
gee, you sure like to make a lot of claims, not to mention do mine & others thinking for me/us.. yet you have absolutely nothing to back them up..
fyi: the NARRATIVE i am NOT BUYING
INTO is that of the OBAMESSIAH's..
==
"His contribution to our understanding of Middle Eastern history is very important, even if he was mostly incorrect"
ReplyDeleteIncorrect? It would be more accurate to characterize Edward Said's "scholarship" as grossly dishonest.
'Why do we sacrifice our own national self-interest to please Israel?'
ReplyDeleteWe are NOT.
What we are doing, is bucking up the dam that is holding back a good portion of the tide of islamofascist imperialism that threatens the globe. If Israel falls, it will be the greatest recruitment tool islamic terrorists ever had.
Anon - "I can't agree with you that Edward Said is in the same category as Jeremiah Wright....His contribution to our understanding of Middle Eastern history is very important, even if he was mostly incorrect."
ReplyDeleteAh yes, "fake but accurate."