In fact, he says Obama is an "enemy of God."
And, Keller decided to preach about it on YouTube:
Barack Obama is NOT a Christian, he is an ENEMY of God!!!
The video has the Obama Campaign "scrambling to do damage control."
The Standard Newswire reported:
Senator Barack Obama's campaign team is scrambling to do damage control in the wake of the national story two weeks ago when the world's leading Internet evangelist Bill Keller of Liveprayer, questioned in a widely distributed Op-ed article, YouTube video, and Daily Devotional to his 2.4 million subscribers whether Senator Obama was really a Christian.It looks like the Obama campaign will have to start a new section on the Fight the Smears website.
Keller questioned the authenticity of Senator Obama's faith in Christ due to the fact he has stated there are "many paths to God" when orthodox Christianity clearly teaches that faith in Jesus Christ is the only way to be saved, in addition to his support of killing babies, gay marriage, and giving away part of Israel to the Palestinians, all contrary to Christian teachings according to the Bible.
In response to Keller's assertions, the Obama campaign has launched the Joshua Generation Project, concentrating on young Christian rather than older Christians who are unlikely to support someone who advocates killing babies and gay marriage. Also, last week Senator Obama had a private meeting in Chicago with a handpicked selection of evangelicals who were allowed to ask him any question, but were forbidden to share his answers with the press or in any public forum.
Lastly, was the launch of a new campaign website designed to counter the rumors and false information being spread on the Internet.
The topic of today's LivePrayer television program is whether or not Barack Obama is indeed a Christian.
You can tune in to the livefeed on the internet.
Haha, I love it. I'm sitting here just counting the days until B.O's campaign completely crumbles from it's lofty aspirations.
ReplyDeleteGod Bless Bill Keller. Please speak loudly and often.
ReplyDeleteIn one interview BHO described sin as "being out of alignment with my values". I don't think that any true Christian would say such a thing.
ReplyDeleteHe had me until the religious left...beyond that, he sounds like a hardcore right wing nut...the opposite side of the coin to Obama. Too much tolerance vs. no tolerance. Zealotry is zealotry no matter how you paint it. Nothing that does not go down the middle path is honest and safe. Take it from us Iranians who have seen it get out of hand.
ReplyDelete++
ReplyDeleteOT..
HT : TG via RW
Pro-Obama Iraqi-American Ex-Convict
Supports Increased Attacks on U.S. Troops
excerpt:
[Alsammarae, an Iraqi-American Chicagoan, added during remarks carried by Radio Sawa (Arabic link) that he had contributed the maximum allowable of $2,300 to Barack Obama’s campaign. But there’s another Obama link to Alsammarae: while serving as electricity minister Alsammarae had been involved in brokering deals in the Iraqi electricity sector for Antoin Rezko, Obama’s long-term friend and patron. Rezko is the Syrian-American hustler who was convicted of fraud in an Illinois court on the day that Obama secured the Democratic nomination.]
Alsammarae, ready to rejoin Allawi's political
coalition, calls for more insurgent attacks
excerpt:
[Now, he wants more insurgent attacks on U.S. troops. What a slime-bucket, but he’s the same slime-bucket that I’ve always thought he was, from the days before the war when he opportunistically hopped onto the anti-Saddam bandwagon when it began revving up for real.
I had seen part of Alsammarrae’s General Intelligence Directorate file back in Baghdad, and he’s identified as a snitch that had worked for the Saddam regime while he was a student in the 1970s, reporting on the political activities and utterances of fellow Iraqi students then pursuing their degrees in the UK.]
==
"...a private meeting in Chicago with a handpicked selection of evangelicals who were allowed to ask him any question, but were forbidden to share his answers with the press or in any public forum."
ReplyDeleteA 'new kind of politics', eh? No backroom dealings. How the heck is this supposed to help him? Who's directing this clown car, anyway?
I especially like the 'handpicked' part. Do you suppose he thoroughly 'vetted' them, unlike those VP search types who didn't really work for him?
Possibly Michelle decided who would picked.
Crap like that will guarantee Obama in the White House.
ReplyDelete1) God needs a better class of enemies. Ones who can speak without cue cards.
ReplyDelete2) This is more of an embarrassment for evangelists and the sane conservatives who will be hit by the spatter. Calling someone, no matter how vile, lame or weaselly an "enemy of God" makes one look like an illiterate medieval cleric (or a modern Islamic one). Obama's people are scrambling - not to do damage control but to make the most of this gift.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete++
ReplyDeletecorrection re: bg @ 9:05 AM..
i have a real problem with zealots..
imo however, this man (whom i have never even heard of before) was very precise, unbiased & factually forthright in presenting his convictions in regards to what a Christian is/ is not.. and Barack Obama may be religious.. but he is NOT A TRUE CHRISTIAN AT HEART.. neither was Hitler, no matter how loud or long the anti-Christian zealots on the left bark..
==
I have said from day one that Obama is not a Christian. Obama is a liar, and God hates a liar.
ReplyDeleteWhether this minister is too far right for some, and though I disagree on a inconsequential point or two, it should be plain to those who can see that Obama stating he is a Christian is just a political ploy to help him secure his place in the WhiteHouse.
Obama is lying about his Christian beliefs, so what else could he possibly not lie about? It is blatantly obvious to see that he could lie about anything without conscience.
Keller did not say "Obama is Not a Christian," in fact, he explicitly made a point of saying given Obama's profession of faith he could *not* judge Obama's heart and determine that. However, he did say we could evaluation the words and deeds of Obama to see if they line up with the Christian gospel or the position of an enemy of God. Based on the objective observations and actual words spoken, we can say that they conflict with the word of God, but we still cannot say Obama is not a Christian, because many new or old but immature in the Word Christians act as enemies of God even though they may be Christians, simply because they do not have the scriptural knowledge to act in alignment with it. Keller did *not* say Obama is not a Christian.
ReplyDeleteHaha...I think Republicans should run with this...Tell all the pro-choice and pro-equality Christians in this country that they're not really Christians, that's a sure way to win the White House.
ReplyDeleteI am waiting for the evangelists to start saying that the epic, Biblical-in-size floods in Iowa are payback to the people of Iowa for being the first to give Barack Obama a win in the primaries and set off his Democratic Presidential campaign...
ReplyDeleteDave in NYC,
ReplyDeleteHahaha... :) good to see you laugh for a change instead of podunking your keyboard.
I suspect what will be run in the fall is the truth about Obama's Marxist and Communist nominations by the New Party and connections and funding from one William Ayers and Dorhn, responsible for manslaugter and terrorist bombings within our nation.
I suspect they will ask Obama why he didn't... uh, uh, uhhhh vet himself when meeting with these vile cretins and enemies of America, cop killers ya know Dave and ask the question.
Mr Obama, who is reponsible for Vetting you?
Answer: We the People, Vote No To Support of American Communist Terrorist.
Easy...
Another easy policy slam dunk against the hypocrisy of Obama.
ReplyDeleteHe'll talk with the nutjob in Iran, but refuse to embrace a new ally in Iraq. He'll End the War as he said, pull our troops out and leave Iraqis to fend for themselves against Iran, Syria and al Qaeda.
Ed Morrisey has an excellent post up commenting on WaPo article about such liberal buffoonery of Obama and Brzezinski Carter Rerun cut and run policy...
Why are'nt Democrats Embracing an Iraqi Alliance?
Good question.
Here are more...
Why are democrats not embracing Colunbia?
Why are democrats not embracing South Korea?
Why are Democrats not embracing Freedom from Foreign oil?
Why are Democrats not embracing a Free Cuban people?
Why are Democrats not embracing a Free Iranian people?
And the reverse...
Why are Democrats embracing Iran?
Why are Democrats embracing Syria?
Why are Democrats embracing Chavez?
Why are Democrats embracing FARC?
Why are Democrats embracing Marxist?
Why are Democrats embracing Communist?
Why are Democrats embracing Fidel?
Why are Democrats embracing Nation of Islam?
The list is seemingly endless of blindness to thuggery, but rejection of freedom around the world.
How any sane person can support Obama is beyond rational explanation.
A final quote from WaPo...
"So it’s hard to fathom why Democrats in Congress have joined Ayatollah Khamenei in denouncing the U.S.-Iraqi agreements even before they are written. Critics such as Sen. James Webb (D-Va.) are professing to be outraged that the Bush administration might be forging a relationship with Iraq “that parallels the Korea-Japan history,” as Mr. Webb put it. They claim to be shocked by the suggestions of Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) that U.S. forces might remain in Iraq for decades without controversy if they did not suffer casualties, as has happened in Japan and South Korea. Yet the U.S. alliances with Japan and South Korea have been among the most successful in this nation’s history. While building a similar bond with Iraq may prove impossible, it’s hard to understand why Democrats would oppose it in principle."
It is easy to understand if the Media will recognize that Obama's deep connections and support come from the most radical side of far left politics in America.
New Party = Communist
Nation of Islam = Nutjob haters
Black Liberation Theology = Marxist and many racist.
Hamas = Terrorist
Why does WaPo find it so hard? Drinking from liberal koolaid to long of mult-culturalism?
++
ReplyDeleteJoshua @ 12:20 PM. (thumbsup)
additional excerpts via WaPo:
[In fact, much of the controversy over the negotiations is based on misinformation, some of it spread by Iran's proxies in Iraq. There are claims that the Bush administration is seeking to establish scores of permanent U.S. bases. In fact, Iraq has merely asked that the agreement list the bases from which American forces would be permitted to operate. It is claimed that the deals would perpetuate the U.S. "occupation." In fact, they would be a major step in the opposite direction, by placing American troops under the sovereignty of the Iraqi government rather than the United Nations.
If the United States were to make a formal commitment to defend Iraq from external aggression, congressional consideration and approval of the pact would be appropriate. For now, the biggest risk is that Tehran and its allies will pressure Mr. Maliki into backing away from a partnership with Washington. In that case, Iran would hasten to substitute itself as Iraq's defender and strategic ally, with momentous implications for the rest of the Middle East. Surely this is not what the Democrats want.]
PICTURE ME SHOCKED SPEECHLESS!!
==
++
ReplyDeleteclarifying SHOCKED re: bg @ 1:20 PM..
not about what has been reported, that's old news.. what i'm SHOCKED about is the fact that the WaPo not only reported it, but came down on the Dems for their outright anti-US interests!!
==
BHO has been addressing the Joshua Generation Project for some time now. I'll remind folks that Obama would lead disgruntled black liberationists on new riots to bring down what he would term the walls of Jericho that would be our Constitutional government.
ReplyDeleteObama is Soros' Pinocchio, the jackass liar tied up with strings. Of himself, Obama would be no threat. But as Soros owns not only the DNC candidate but the MSM and Wall Street, Obama his mouthpiece is a threat to every American who would think for himself and eschew the Change We Can Believe In drug induced "hope" for a brain dead existence that liberal socialists enforce.
".....simply because they do not have the scriptural knowledge to act in alignment with it." by Cinday
ReplyDeleteCindy, get real - that is the weakest rationale I've heard yet concerning anything about Obama. Obama sat in a church for 20 years...what is he, deaf? I'm sure he has heard of the 10 Commandments, so spin away, but with the issues of abortion and homosexuality at the forefront of any election for the last 20 years in America, he should have had the wherewithal to have checked his Bible first.
Dave - Christians believe in the Word of God - the Bible; if they are going to call themselves Christians and make up new rules, then they should just quit fooling themselves and either make some real changes in their own lives or start their own religion.
It wasn't so long ago, that Americans were wholeheartedly against homosexuality and abortion, now the country has both unabated. What is next - legalizing pedophilia?
Obama supports homosexuality and abortion; why doesn't he just tell the truth - he isn't a Christian. At least this honesty would be refreshing.
++
ReplyDeleteJoshua @ 12:20 PM..
bg @ 1:20 PM..
re: A Partnership With Iraq
what kind of BS is this??
[This would seem to be an obvious U.S. gain in what, according
to Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) as well as President Bush, is the urgent task of countering Iran's attempt to dominate the Middle East. It means that Iraq, a country with the world's second largest oil reserves and a strategic linchpin of the Middle East, just might emerge from the last five years of war and turmoil as an American ally, even if its relations with Iran remain warm.]
can anyone explain to me how the WaPo
arrived at that convoluted conclusion??
thanks..
==
++
ReplyDeleteps re: bg @ 4:19 PM..
Bush & Obama couldn't be more polar opposites on Iraq & Iran if they were freakin' bears!!
==
Hey, bg 4:22, present company excepted? :) (At least the non-freakin' kind.)
ReplyDeleteBTW, from what I've been reading over at LGF, the obamster, and his islamo-fascist pals aren't the only ones giving evangelical Christians cause for concern. Mr. Johnson has allowed at least one comment equating Bible-believing Christians with the jihadists to go unrefuted. Seems odd, but there you go.
Friends tell me that they have seen a number of posts where Christians are berated, and made fun of, because they (gasp!) actually believe in a Creator.
To each their own, but given the number of Conservatives who are Christians, it seems a little like drilling holes in your own boat.
This year, since mccain has been wildly chopping away at the bottom of HIS boat, pausing only to resharpen the ax, perhaps the other rinos feel more comfy showing their true colors.
Personally, having already abandoned the republican party to it's rino madness, my wife and I are preparing our bunker for pres. o..
On a happy note, Judge Moore, from Alabama (of Ten Commandments in the courthouse fame) will be speaking to a group of Conservatives, including reps from a large Christian Homeschool group.
Jihadists, indeed. Shame on LGF, its thuggish treatment of Christians, and shame on rinos everywhere.
++
ReplyDeleteBEAR @ 7:36 PM..
lol, but please note that i did
not use CAPITAL letters.. :D
==
Thanx, bg, I feel much better, now!
ReplyDeleteJoanne @ 3:22, re: your comment:
ReplyDelete"Cindy get real - that is the weakest rationale I've heard yet concerning anything about Obama. Obama sat in a church for 20 years...what is he, deaf?"
Hey, I didn't pull this concept of the spiritually immature church attender out of a hat! It's very possible to be a still-in-diapers Christian who lives contrary to the Bible because what he has heard is not the biblical message. Here it is, straight out of the Bible: Heb 5:12-14.
(Jesus himself cites such churches, and most of the New Testament books are books correcting false teachings and theological misunderstandings.)
Church attendance, baptism, 10 commandments, being good, social activism, Exodus or liberation theology stories, none of that saves or makes a person a Christian--and Obama speaks of people redeeming themselves (!); the church he sat in is of a denomination not known for teaching the gospel, and that particular church really is not known for that (Obama admittedly adheres to a "social gospel" - his words).