CAIR says, "Images of Rage Boy promote hatred towards Muslims."
Well, not quite... Images of Rage Boy show his hatred towards non-Muslims.
The BBC comes to the rescue of the former Islamic terrorist and professional protester known affectionately as "Rage Boy", via ROP:
Rageboy is causing something of a stir on the internet at the moment....And, in dozens of mainstream media photos from Kashmir (see HERE)
It is an image of the face of an angry Moslem protestor and it has been used by rightwingers in the United States to mock Islamic fundamentalists. The face appears on teeshirts and mugs.
There have been claims it is the face of one particular man and that his rights and privacy have been breached."Rage Boy's" rights and privacy have been breached???
But the image is still being used and charged for by a group called Nose on your Face.
By whom?... The same media people who made him a Reuters star?
This is outrageous!... It makes you want to go out and torch an embassy or buy a "Rage Boy" mug.
The BBC has the debate with CAIR spokesman Ibrahim Hooper and High Pankuck, aka potfry, from Nose on Your Face.
++
ReplyDelete'ISLAMOPHOBIA' IDIOCY by Amir Taheri
Muslims Fleeing CAIR in Droves
Just Who Does CAIR Represent?
excerpt:
[According to tax documents obtained by The Times, the number of reported members spiraled down from more than 29,000 in 2000 to less than 1,700 in 2006, a loss of membership that caused the Muslim rights group's annual income from dues to drop from $732,765 in 2000, when yearly dues cost $25, to $58,750 last year, when the group charged $35.
The organization instead is relying on about two dozen individual donors a year to contribute the majority of the money for CAIR's budget, which reached nearly $3 million last year.
CAIR only has about 1,700 dues paying member and they want you to believe that they speak for Muslim Americans? My estimation of the vast majority of Muslims that I know is that they would never have anything to do with an organization as vile as CAIR.]
AIFD
CAIR’s Islamism Revealed
excerpt:
[True to form in the usual Islamist fallback to public criticism, CAIR claimed that the Washington Times was ‘anti-Muslim’ and ‘anti-Islam’. They use the protection of religion when the facts are not on their side. They use the discourse of politics when they want to push forth their Islamist agenda with the presumption of speaking for all Muslims. They will delve into the political only on their own terms in both foreign and domestic policy but when they are on the receiving end of political criticism they run for cover under the guise of victimization.]
that's just a sample..
==