James Taylor a Senior Fellow from the Heartland Institute shares the latest NASA news that strikes another blow into the heart of global warming dogma fanatics.
Alan Colmes gets a global warming tongue lashing...
Taylor asks, "Who are you going to believe? NASA, or a liberal activist group?"
We know who Colmes will believe...
Seen on Hannity and Colmes
In the video Taylor shows a photo of the growing Antarctica ice cap.
It's a hard point to argue.
A British court ruled this month that Al Gore's "An Inconvenient Truth" makes at least 11 false or unsupported claims.
And... a study by NASA confirmed that "the rapid decline in winter perennial ice the past two years was caused by unusual winds" not by global warming.
But, jet-setter Gore is the odds on favorite to win the Nobel Peace Prize for his global warming fanaticism.
++
ReplyDeletehere's one from April re: Hurricanes
==
Enron commissioned its own internal study of global warming science. It turned out to be largely in agreement with the same scientists that Enron was trying to shut up. After considering all of the inconsistencies in climate science, the report concluded: “The very real possibility is that the great climate alarm could be a false alarm. The anthropogenic warming could well be less than thought and favorably distributed.”
ReplyDeleteOne of Enron’s major consultants in that study was NASA scientist James Hansen, who started the whole global warming mess in 1988 with his bombastic congressional testimony. Recently he published a paper in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences predicting exactly the same inconsequential amount of warming in the next 50 years as the scientists that Enron wanted to gag.
More: Enron And Carbon Trading - Hansen Double Deals
m.simon~ Sorry, we don't so 'simon sez.' We prefer to think for ourselves, and not buy into bogus articles.
ReplyDelete++
ReplyDeletethis clip is not the one wanted to post.. apparently You Tube has been deleting & burying The Great Global Warming Swindle videos..
i hope this link works (there are
several more linked at the end)..
The Great Global Warming Swindle
==
Regarding bg's comment: "Sorry, we don't so 'simon sez."...
ReplyDeleteLOL! Absolutely...
The Great Global Warming Swindle is a very good piece of educational video...
Another is from CBC titled, "Global Warming Doomsday Called Off" (43 minutes 59 seconds)
After all Global Warming: An Official PseuedoScience
++
ReplyDeleteThe Great Global Warming
Swindle - Part 1
The Great Global Warming
Swindle - Part 2
The Great Global Warming
Swindle - Part 3
The Great Global Warming
Swindle - Part 4
The Great Global Warming
Swindle - Part 5
The Great Global Warming
Swindle - Part 6
The Great Global Warming
Swindle - Part 7
The Great Global Warming
Swindle - Part 8
The Great Global Warming
Swindle - Part 9
hope they work (wish the original, which was rather long & all encompassing was available)..
==
++
ReplyDeleteLOL juandos @ 7:28 AM..
re: "we don't do simon says"
(corrected typo.. ;)
was Otter @ 1:51 AM
& agree, too funny!! :D
==
++
ReplyDeletejuandos @ 7:28 AM
re: Another is from CBC titled, "Global Warming
Doomsday Called Off" (43 minutes 59 seconds)
wrong link (maybe the one missing from YT)!?
==
Damn it!
ReplyDeleteI did it again...
Sorry bg, here's the real life url - movie not broken up BTW...
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3309910462407994295
I downloaded and mp4 version of it from the same site...
A very informative documentary about the real cause of global warming. It clearly discuss about the fact that CO2 is not cause of global ... all » warming. Take a look also at the Great Global Warming Swindle and Green House Conspiracy in google video. This documentary discusses many topics that are not covered in the Swindle such as the hockey stick graph, from the viewpoint of Willie Soon and Sallie Baliunas
++
ReplyDeletethanks juandos.. :)
==
The Great Global Warming Swindle is not a great piece of educational video. Have you looked at the reviews? Check it out on Wikipedia.
ReplyDeleteHere are some highlights:
-Incorrect facts - for example, Durkin claims volcanoes produce more CO2 than people, when in fact humans produce more than 100 times that of volcanoes. (He admitted to this)
-His graphics team extended the time axis on the solar irradiance vs temperature graph and filled it in as he pleased, about this Durkin commented "The original NASA data was very wiggly-lined and we wanted the simplest line we could find," Mr Durkin said.
-37 british scientists signed a letter of complaint saying they "believe that the misrepresentations of facts and views, both of which occur in your programme, are so serious that repeat broadcasts of the programme, without amendment, are not in the public interest. In view of the seriousness of climate change as an issue, it is crucial that public debate about it is balanced and well-informed".
-Two of the scientists featured in the film, Carl Wunsch and Eigil Friis-Christensen, have since stated that they disagree with the way their contributions were used. Wunsch's comments have since been removed, and Christensen was the provider of the graphs - which he says had been altered, particularly from 1980 on.
It goes on and on, but if your at all open minded, you'll give the whole thing a read and realize that film is a gross misrepresentation of science and has no credibility.
juandos,
ReplyDeletethe reason you cannot see the original is because so much was removed. Sections were removed because they were not true, data had been fudged, and because scientists that had been misrepresented had complained and had there parts removed.